• JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m pretty sure only people on the internet argue about this. No one actually cares what other’s do with their last name after marriage.

    This post has 2017 reddit vibes. Not in a good way either.

    • teslasaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Well, reddit turned to shit around 2014, so the fact it still sucked around 2017 can’t be a surprise?

      People definitely care, but not about which side of the family or if it comes from mommy or daddy. Most people just want an “original” name.

    • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      People literally change their names because they feel like it, so I’m sure people do care outside the Internet, specially in circumstances of abuse.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Yeah, my mom said she didn’t care about taking my dad’s last name, that it didn’t matter since, in her words “women don’t have last names anyway” they are just a way of tracing men’s family lines.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s the point, but satirically. The fact that homelander is the second frame immediately means the take is bad.

      • Faresh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t think that’s obvious to anyone who hasn’t watched that movie/series/whatever. At least it wasn’t obvious to me, because I don’t know that guy.

      • tomi000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Not so sure. It may just as well be that OP thinks Homelander is the cool guy and the meme is meant unironically. Their comments here suggest that and their posts are mostly comprised of golf and borderline sexist / boomer jokes

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Good point! But I also never saw it. Just know it from the comics and the news.

          Also, the amount of people who don’t GET homeowner is scary…

            • spujb@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world in particular has a weird propensity to anti-feminism that i don’t see elsewhere. i’ll get about 60% downvotes on this comment just as everywhere else in this thread just for saying so lol

              something about the old school “relax librul it’s called dark humor” mindset is specially present here

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          this lol. i would not be in this comment section if OP wasn’t obviously taking the side of homelander here. if there was ever satire in the post it was lost as soon as OP got their hands on it.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah… it can be interpreted that way. But even as a feminist myself, it is a dumb performative sort of protest. Paternal surnames are the least important fixtures of our patriarchal society, and, unless it was created wholecloth, there are no surnames that aren’t patriarchal historical lyrics, as the meme points out.

      • Nat (she/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        If they think their actions are having much effect, sure, but otherwise I think you’re making assumptions and overreacting. Not everything is for show, people can do things like that just because they personally want to.

        • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          The context of the meme implied she was doing it because she’s a feminist and that taking her mother’s name was somehow an expression of that. Of course she can do that, but it isn’t achieving anything if that was the goal

          • spujb@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            she is achieving and asserting herself, a right that is denied to her on most every other level.

            names are symbols. taking ownership of your name may not be material, but it is meaningful. if names were meaningless, trans people wouldn’t change their names, African-American communities wouldn’t change their names, et cetera. but they do, and feminists do, because achieving oneself, having domain over oneself even to the extent of identity, is meaningful especially against a history where that right is restricted against you in favor of the dominant class.

            • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Sure. It would be personally meaningful. Changing your name is always meaningful, I would hope. But it is not contributing to the the dismantling of the patriarchal norms. Not every action has to be, of course. But the conceit of this post is implied to be that her intention was just that, a rejection of patriarchal naming conventions. If that was her intention, it was misguided and failed to achieve that goal.

              • spujb@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                you take a conservative (lowercase c) approach to the concept more than i do, and that’s fine.

                but from a holistic perspective, the very fact that we have this conversation proves my position. the symbols stand for something. they promote dialogue and awareness of patriarchal repression by subverting it. little girls can look to the woman who takes her own name and derive conviction of self worth and autonomy.

                none of this means that taking one’s name is the ultimate be-all feminist act, but i just take issue with your characterization of it being “dumb performative.” i encourage you, as a self-proclaimed feminist, to reconsider heaping that kind of abuse onto people just extending their reach to where generations before was impossible. at worst you appear to be recentering patriarchal narratives, at best you’re being mean.

    • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s one of those posts that IS funny, but makes OP’s viewpoint ambiguous. And if this was reddit and then incels come out of the woodwork to support the meme.

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I know this is a shitposting community but these are, every goddamn one of them, the dumbest possible takes you could have opened a new year with.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      A quarter century into the new millenium and our general intelligence level hasn’t budged since the ice age.

      • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I think it’s gone down tbh. The average human is not experiencing the same novel problems that require troubleshooting and focus. A lot of thought is just decision based these days.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          According to the little arrows on our comments, there were like, two people really angered by this thought that some people think the rest of people are stupid. It’s amazing.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      No thanks. I don’t care what my hypothetical spouse wants to do with their last name but I’m not changing mine. Sounds like a pain in the ass.

      • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        It is a pain in the ass, a burden that is put on the woman. Men don’t even have to consider changing their last name if they don’t want to, (straight, married) women have to consider if they will betray expectations by not taking her husband’s last name.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      My wife and I actually did this, sort of. Not a completely new name, but we took her grandmother’s name, rather than either of ours. Or, her great grandfather’s name, I suppose.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Terrible idea. People clearly already struggling at naming kids. Coming up with a family name will be endless letters making the wrong sound, random sections being ‘silent’, so many puns or references to things, corporate advertising “oh it’s the X.com family!”… Terrible, just terrible.

    • Kitathalla@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The only reason I wouldn’t want to take my partner’s name, or have the partner take mine, is the same reason I wouldn’t want to blend. It’s just a headache to make sure everything is changed. It’s why you see a lot of people who published research before their marriage continue to publish under the same name even if they changed their name. It’s a major hassle.

      • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Sure it’s a headache. So why does the woman have to do it? I think either keep your names as is or both people change.

        • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          My wife was made fun of for her last name until she was like 25 (her social group sucked), so she was delighted to changed her name when I asked her if we were going to use mine or hers. I still don’t entirely mind changing mine or keeping it: I’d gotten a few public works built around town and one of them was named after me, and if I took her name the chances of getting them to change the name of that shelter were fuck all. You can only be the center of the universe for so long. So it just kind of worked out for both of us.

        • Kitathalla@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          I think either keep your names as is

          Uh… that was exactly what I said…

          So why does the woman have to do it?

          And that was exactly what I was saying I wouldn’t do…

    • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      A lot of last names here are frozen patronyms (e.g. at some point some dude named Hans had kids; now there are lots of people calling themselves his son, Hansen) or place names. I kinda like the place name bit: Just give kids last names to a place they have a connection to. Where they were born or conceived or something.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                Sorry, but unfortunately I got interested and followed your link:

                There is a popular legend that “hooker” as a slang term for a prostitute is derived from his last name[26] because of parties and a lack of military discipline at his headquarters near the Murder Bay district of Washington, DC. Some versions of the legend claim that the band of prostitutes that followed his division was derisively referred to as “General Hooker’s Army” or “Hooker’s Brigade”.[27] However, the term “hooker” was used in print as early as 1845, years before Hooker was a public figure,[28] and is likely derived from the concentration of prostitutes around the shipyards and ferry terminal of the Corlear’s Hook area of Manhattan in the early to middle 19th century, who came to be referred to as “hookers”.

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  lack of military discipline at his headquarters near the Murder Bay district

                  To be fair, he could probably have chosen a better place to set up…

      • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Certainly in the long past your last name was probably derived from the town or area that you lived in. I don’t think it would work today.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        “London”: Not too bad, works ok.

        “Climax”: …

        “Tallahassee”: Pretty frickin’ awesome as a nickname but not sure formally.

        “Syracuse”: I syr-acuse that of sounding dumb.

        But regardless, besides all the “Von” or “De” or whatever names I’m willing to bet that modified or old spelling last names based on places are totally a thing that we also just decided to stop doing.

        • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah, like the -berg names (e.g. Stoltenberg), it’s likely the family farm if you go far enough back. My family has a name that’s an island and the settlement on it. Taking a profile picture next to the town sign that’s also our last name is pretty common (for a name of a few hundred people).

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Where they were born or conceived or something.

        “Hi there, Mr. Dumpsterbach.”

        • vzq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          And we do! The most common name in the Netherlands translates to “the Frisian”.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      A coworker of mine did this. He and his new wife took parts of their last names and blended them together to create a unique new last name for both of them.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s more that it’s kinda missing the point. Everything is something else if you try hard enough but in this case the intention behind it is to honour the mother instead of the mother and that’s still working fine.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      No one is off-put by the realization. Just the attitude the post represents.

              • kemsat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                Yup. She’s particularly bad, imo, because she keeps validating the crazy guy. She takes a bunch of drugs so she can lactate, because Homelander likes breastfeeding because he killed his mom during birth.

          • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Scratching my head trying to figure out how an undeniale fact is somehow a condemnation of women.

            • shneancy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              pointing out how someone’s mother’s last name is just their grandfather’s last name ignores the point the person was trying to make in favour of going “well akschually”.

              a woman who feels more connected with her mother and prefers her last name over her father’s last name has made that decision based on her emotions associated with her family relationships. And it was a choice she had to make against the default way surnames are given.

              people rarely do things like going through lengthy legal processes to get the necessary paperwork to change your last name for shit and giggles. Instead of “well askchanelyling” people’s choices, think a bit on why they made that particular choice, or you could also ask them

  • fargeol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    If you didn’t know, Spanish people have two names: the first name of their father and the first name of their mother.

    Since these names are their grandfathers names, here’s a better proposal : the first name of your father and the second name of your mother. In that case, your first name corresponds to a bloodline of men and your second name to a bloodline of women… Unless their was a same-sex couple in your family, obviously.

    Bonus point, since you get your Y chromosome (if you have one) from your biological father and your mitochondrial DNA from your biological mother, your names correspond to your actual DNA… Unless you’re adopted or illegitimate, obviously.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      You can actually chose to have them reverted (mother first, father second). Also, the wife does not take the husband’s surname.

  • ngn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    why yall having a war in the comments? its a silly meme about last names, who the actual fuck cares?

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      People online do not understand jokes. I refuse to believe anyone in real life would be this dense.

      In real life people would see this lol and move on, on the internet they write dissertations about some BS to virtue signal to other strangers how enlightened they are… 🙄

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Probably anyone who ever gotten any pressure about handling last-names after marriage might care. It’s definitely something that some people care about, and some people cop flack for their decision.

      The joke is just a joke, but the problem is that this joke punches down. That’s generally poor form.

      • ngn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        if you are getting “punched down” (aka offended) by a joke posted on lemmy, by a random guy, you should realize that it is simply not that deep

        yeah i didnt get any pressure about handling last names, so you might say “you just dont get it” but when i go to linuxmemes and see a meme about a distro i use, i dont go to comments and start a war about it bc it is just a fucking meme, same concept

        • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          if you are getting “punched down” (aka offended) by a joke posted on lemmy, by a random guy, you should realize that it is simply not that deep

          I think you’ve misunderstood what punching down means. It has nothing to do with being offended. It’s about the relationship between the person telling the joke and the subject of the joke. For example, it’s generally fine for anyone to make jokes mocking rich people; but its not ok to make jokes mocking poor people unless you yourself are very obviously a poor person.

    • Ilandar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Because their entire poltical and world view is based on identity politics. They cannot simply say “that joke sucked” and move on, they have to make it into yet another virtue signalling exercise and lecture everyone else because that is the behaviour they associate with being a “good person”.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Reminder that surnames didn’t exist before the middle ages, you just had a singular name that people shouted to get your attention. Since you lived in a community of several dozen people, you didn’t need to do much to differentiate yourself from the other “John” in your town because everyone knows each other. You lived and died just as “John” and would be remembered by your kids for a generation if you were lucky. There was no need to keep track of genealogy, you were a pair of hands and legs, you were supposed to get out there and plow that field and that’s all your baron or lord cared about.

      But somewhere after the black plague ravaged Europe and we lost a sizeable chunk of the human population, suddenly workers became in high-demand. Industrialist lords and landowners suddenly didn’t have people smithing their horse shoes or making their bread, so they had to go poach people from far away towns and suddenly workers had power and options. As a way to get noticed for your family’s tradeskill, you would have been wise to advertise this to wealthy employers, the best way was to attach your trade to your name. You were now John Baker to differentiate yourself from John the Drunkard if anyone came looking to hire someone who could cook bread.

      So surnames are advertising. It’s all it’s ever been. There’s nothing ancient and special about your name, it was just how your ancestors tried to make a buck.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        🤓

        To be fair, even before the plagues, workers were way in demand (and hence every single adult that reaches majority, or youth that wishes to pretend). Throughout the agrarian age, societies suffered from a stark labor shortage, which is why even bastard kids were not too frowned upon, and even those with disabilities were sought for anything they might be able to do.

        That all changed in the industrial age, when fewer people were necessary to run machines that did work.

        In modern day, this is an issue with religious movements (cults whether dangerous or not) who decide to create their own commune. Either the intentional community has too few people to complete all the necessary tasks, or enough that renegade behavior (corruption, antisocial behavior, etc.) becomes a problem, since security details cannot help but become political.

        /🤓