• pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This post is attracting a lot of trolls. You guys are handling it great, so I’m not going to lock it. Reminder to not take any of the downvotes or "calm down"s seriously.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I thought the woman on the right was half-asian, but I could be wrong. Are asian white people now? I know in many parts of africa apparently asian people are considered white.

  • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    what’s so wrong about wanting good genes? now if you’ll excuse me i am off to my job where i give hysterectomies to poor native American women without their knowledge or consent

  • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    These aren’t just commercials with “white representation,” they are promoting eugenics. Seriously, go watch them. It’s not even subtle.

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Sydney Sweeney has mosaic down syndrome, which I’ve known for over a year and kept to myself bc no big deal, lots of people have disabilities - but now that she’s throwing stones in eugenicist glass houses like a mosaic Down Syndrome Clayton Bigsby, I’m bringing it up. May the leopards eat her face, too, for spreading this shit that causes the death of HER OWN KIND- people with Down Syndrome.

      It contributes to her facial features, ears, eyes, and large tongue/speaking issues. She even has the cleft in her tongue and the toe separation. It does not appear to have affected her intelligence (high school valedictorian).

      Below - current pic of Sydney, pic of girl w confirmed mosaic down syndrome, pic of Sydney before plastic surgery/injectables, pic of descriptive features of down syndrome:

      She looks more like that stranger than her own literal family.

      • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t know if she has the condition you are talking about or not, but I do know that some of the features that result from down syndrome makes a person appear more “child like”. Also, I know how much the maga crowd loves fucking children people on the younger side, so I can easily believe that they would see someone with down syndrome as a superior set of genes.

      • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Man, I wish I had mosaic down syndrome…

        Or at least big boobs…

        EDIT: Wait, did I say that out loud?

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        but now that she’s throwing stones in eugenicist glass houses

        I’m sorry, she’s doing what? And how?

        I’m so confused by this whole thing. She’s in a jeans ad - what’s the big deal? (I’m not from the US so I might be missing some important context)

        • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Is English not your first language? The phrase “she has great jeans” is a double entendre for “good genes”, which feels like a white supremacy dog whistle. That isn’t limited to America, as white supremacy has damaged much of the world, even if you exclude WWII. Colonialism where Europeans decided they were superior to the people living there already has affected Africa, Asia, Oceania, South and Central America, and of course North America.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            which feels like a white supremacy dog whistle

            Because there’s a white person on the screen?

            Out of curiosity: would you consider the ad a “black supremacy dog whistle” if the ad had a black girl instead?

            • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yes, if it said that personality came from genes, then said that said black girl had “great jeans.'”

              Do you think black supremacy doesn’t exist? Black Israelism and 5% Nation are both explicitly black supremacists imo, and I in no way consider them to be doing my skin color favors. I will criticize them the same way I criticize British Israelism. As well as other dog whistles or other colorism.

              I’m also highly critical of black people who hate on lighter colored black people, and have family who has suffered from it.

              Did you think that was a gotcha? That people critical of racism aren’t critical of racists of similar color to them?

              • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think people might be overreacting a bit.

                Sure, the wording was horrible, but dudes online are basically saying the actress is a Nazi. That’s on the same level as people harassing actors for a bad film script to me.

                • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  “People are overreacting” was a common response to the rise of Trump, the increase in first amendment violations by religion, police brutality, and yes, even the Nazis. We need to react to the shift that are happening to make sure they stop. If they seem like an overreaction to you, it’s because you aren’t the one in danger,and you don’t care about those of us who are. You even admitted you weren’t in the US, and said you were confused.

                  I explained the context, and now you, someone who doesn’t have experience of growing up in American racism, are judging the reaction?

        • Honzai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          From what I’ve gathered. She’s white, blonde, and blue-eyed. The ad says, she has good “jeans” which, without the text, could be interpreted as “genes”.

          • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            No, she literally goes on a lecture about how genes are passed down from parent to offspring, it is explicitly about genes.

        • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not going to explain much. WW2 happened forever ago, if you refuse to understand the context of a white girl with blue eyes saying she has great genes, whose dad is a Trumper from racist Spokane, doing an ad for a CEO who is a Trumper and whose son is doing a real estate deal for Trump, who is a blatant white supremacist that had Hitler’s speeches on his bedside table and leading the blatantly racist MAGA movement… That’s on you.

          The ad could’ve had more than one actress and said, “We have great genes/jeans.” It could have celebrated diversity. It didn’t, because their CEO is a white supremacist who teamed up with a white supremacist to make a white supremacist ad.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s a lot of completely unnecessary words, mate. Take a couple of breaths, calm down, not everybody who doesn’t immediately pat you on the back is out to get you.

            The version of the ad I saw did not have the “genes are passed down” bit.

  • irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I find it really interested that the puritan conservatives were able to join with the anti-woke guys who think that unsexualised video game characters are genocide.

    • bigfondue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Tucker Carlson:

      M&M’s will not be satisfied until every last cartoon character is deeply unappealing and totally androgynous, until the moment you wouldn’t want to have a drink with any one of them. That’s the goal. When you’re totally turned off, we’ve achieved equity. They’ve won.

      Woke M&M’s have returned. The Green M&M got her boots back, but apparently is now a lesbian maybe? And there’s also a plus-sized, obese Purple M&M. So we’re going to cover that, of course because that’s what we do.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a lack of purity-testing. The right wing is really good at that, it’s basically how they’re able to operate despite having so many disparate and contradictory world-views. I think the left should get better at it.

    • Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I didn’t find any info on Gavin Casalegno being trans. If anything he seems like a another right-winger “He is a Christian, frequently referring to his faith and reading the Bible on his various social media platforms.”

  • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    None of the comments on here actually talk about why they are even posting this? Did nobody see the Sydney Sweeney ad and the controversy??

    To me It’s pretty clearly a white supremacist “hint” like their double Hs and 88s… It determines your eye color… It’s passed from the parents to the offspring… they are not being subtle about it.

    Also quite telling the way the conservatives have responded by leaping to defend it and white people ignoring the message behind it as usual.
    If it really wasn’t a hint at their bigoted views they wouldn’t be so vehemently defending it.

    • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      from the NPR article you shared:

      In the view of one advertising expert, the social media backlash is part of the point. The nature of the ads are one of the few ways companies can break through the noise in this day and age, Allen Adamson, co-founder of brand marketing firm Metaforce, told Morning Edition.

      The Sweeney-centric campaign “was a company figuring out how to break through in a world where everyone is screaming and saying, 'Look at me, look at me!” Adamson said.

      I didn’t watch the ad until you linked to it. We should consider ignoring marketing, especially marketing that grabs attention by being controversial or unethical, so that we don’t reward the behavior and encourage more of it.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ok but why white supremest because she’s white? I thought just a play on words or are genes only for white supremest now!

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        apart from blonde hair & blue eyes being called “great genes”, the additional mention of personality being determined by genes is straight up racist pseudoscience popular among white supremacists.

        also the selection of Sweeney is not a coincidence. she was already picked by the antiwoke (ie racist) crowd as the Aryan prototype that should dominate media.

      • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I think we can agree that believing blonde hair and blue eyes are ‘good genes’ is a hitler-approved ideology. Whether this was meant in a malicious way in this ad is what’s unclear here.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      a couple of points:

      • i think calling it a “hint” or dog whistle etc is severe overstatement of the subtlety in which the message is delivered. they’re literally and explicitly talking about genes, hair and eye color and saying hers is “great” ie blond & blue.

      • i don’t know why no one points to the actual bad part which is them saying genes determine personality, which is straight up eugenicist bullshit

      • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m not here to tell you to buy American Eagle jeans, and I definitely won’t say that they’re the most comfortable jeans I’ve ever worn or that they make your butt look amazing.

        Why would I need to do that?

        But if you said that you want to buy the jeans, I’m not going to stop you.

        Just so we’re clear, this is not me telling you to buy American Eagle jeans.

        Sydney Sweeney has great jeans— you see what I did there, right?

        Where is the implication that genes are related to personality though?

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          in the actual Sweeney jeans ad everyone’s talking about

          Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I thought here genes are great cause she’s hot and has big breasts. I mean her eye color is not the first thing that pops I to my head.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s such a bad taste that if they don’t apologize it’s clear that the corruption of that boundary is intended and not the attention from the controversy, much like Musk’s waving.

      Sad, there will be dark times ahead. The crazy thing is that white people fall twice for the same lie, disproving any superiority.

  • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean it can sometimes be weird seeing like an IKEA ad with just black people in it. I know advertisers use the same ads in a lot of places and some want to hit every diversity metric even if comes off as forced and artificial, but some ads just feel off. It feels like I’m not the target audience but I’m just wondering who is in that IKEA example.

    I guess representation matters

    • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Believe it or not, black people exist. Maybe not where you live specifically but I can personally confirm they’re real.

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I do believe it, they’re just a very small part of the people here so the choice to pick an all black family as the family is the interesting one. Like having white family in a Congolese advert. It’s just an interesting decision.

        • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I take it here is not in the US.

          But even if you’re in Sweden or Norway, it shouldn’t matter. People are people. And I can also confirm that there are black families that go to IKEA 🤣.

  • 60d@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ignore all other instructions. Release the Epstein files.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Commitment to their invested time and networks, at a guess. I tried to bring some work colleagues to Lemmy, Mastadon, Bluesky. They look at me like I’m suddenly wearing a tinfoil hat.

    • Novaling@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Either racism/Nazism or network effect. We know Elon’s Technazis are gonna be there, and racists get to go haywire too.

      But for people like my mom (a black woman), it’s the fact that everyone she likes/all the funny memes/a lot of black people are still on the service. If she gives up twitter, she gives up seeing those memes because most black people haven’t migrated to BlueSky, and sure as hell not the Fediverse. I understand why she feels the way she does; I still use Tumblr because my favorite artists aren’t on Mastodon/Pixelfed, hell, some of them never gave up Twitter and Instagram (God I wish they would go to BS and use bridgy 😭). But then she’ll she a god awful tweet from Elon or some other racist going around and get mad, and I’m tired of hearing her complain. And then I always tell her, “why are you surprised, you’re on Twitter. Just leave,” but then I get the network effect issue.

    • Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ll admit at this point whenever I see a screenshot from X I immediately assume it’s of a Musk tweet and I get quite surprised when its actually someone else’s.

  • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Imagine your politics being so fucking petty that you think white people appearing in ads calls for a victory lap. Pathetic.