Tea Party(2010s or so) is when they started going anti-science. They’ve always been pro Christian though, so it’s a fuzzy line.

Have you heard of “sexy indifference”? A relative of mine mentioned it. It kind of makes sense. If you don’t seem desperate or greedy for a relationship, you’ll be more fun to be around and won’t care as much either, because you have your own thing going on.

The shots didn’t get anywhere near him, he is not a victim. Maybe all of the R’s can now go to golf clubs in solidarity with him. It would be way better than wearing a maxipad on their ears.

My bad, sorry about that. I picked up the wrong one. I fixed the link.

Apparently, she not only said it after the debate, but several more times afterwards. The numbers are spiking in registrations and their data says that 80% were shown to vote in the next election.

Super interesting stuff: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05gYZ3ji5jY

Here is the contrast, a video of Tim Walz.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rq4jYAokVn4

As detailed in the complaint, the defendants’ alleged scheme has three main components. First, an agreement to fix the price of peer review services at zero that includes an agreement to coerce scholars into providing their labor for nothing by expressly linking their unpaid labor with their ability to get their manuscripts published in the defendants’ preeminent journals.

Second, the publisher defendants agreed not to compete with each other for manuscripts by requiring scholars to submit their manuscripts to only one journal at a time, which substantially reduces competition by removing incentives to review manuscripts promptly and publish meritorious research quickly.

Third, the publisher defendants agreed to prohibit scholars from freely sharing the scientific advancements described in submitted manuscripts while those manuscripts are under peer review, a process that often takes over a year. As the complaint notes, “From the moment scholars submit manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants behave as though the scientific advancements set forth in the manuscripts are their property, to be shared only if the Publisher Defendant grants permission. Moreover, when the Publisher

https://www.lieffcabraser.com/antitrust/academic-journals/

I found it really entertaining if you like someone skillfully tearing someone apart. She let herself and trump get comfortable and then she stabbed him over and over with her words. She said things we’ve all wanted to say while using a lot of his terms. This was a masterclass. She stumbled maybe 2x in front of a psychopath, I thought it was pretty good.

Here’s the CSPAN link: https://www.c-span.org/video/?538053-1/simulcast-abc-news-presidential-debate

You can still watch it on CSPAN if you want to. I was glad I went back and watched its entirety because watching her skill at taking him down was something. The first 10 minutes are kind of scary, he seemed normal and accessible. Then she started her campaign.

They did ask, Trump talked over the mods. I can’t find a clip of the entire exchange, but the mod asked later as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5qoaj3YndQ

I think that’s an honest mistake. She was awarded the Women’s Grandmaster title and the International Master which is confusing unless you look at the standards. It’s arguably a world title holder? Maybe? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorsa_Derakhshani

It was, but even when I look at present day it shows weird colors and it doesn’t explain what’s going on. I like the one that someone else linked in this thread, it’s more clear. Also, it was kind of cool to compare 2 years ago to today with the old site, even though the today wasn’t that great.

Thank you, this makes way more sense to me.

That’s a cute air biscuit.

I’m guessing you do subscribed as well. I’ve also found it kind of nice to be able to leave and get on with my day. Reddit used to suck me in.

Are you checking for hot, 6 hours and 12 hours? I think it defaults to active which does make it seem, ironically, less active.

I think it depends on what you disagree with. If one is promoting going after our neighbors, hunting them down and killing them? Yeah, defederate. If another is Meta trying to take over the federation. Yeah, I vote defederate. If one thinks Hawaiian pizza is a travesty and the other doesn’t, hold your horses.

Now I want to see her on other non-probable objects.

And it’s important to note that the Muslim travel ban was blocked by the Supreme Court

Different supreme court, it’s now Trump’s and extremely corrupt.

but to show that Trump’s impact on immigration was… limited.

You’re going to have to explain that a little better. The kids and cages thing especially.