• 0 Posts
  • 37 Comments
Joined 18 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2025

help-circle







  • I literally tried to follow transcripts of Trump talking back in 2016, and I couldn’t. They just came off as word salads, unfortunately this is why his base loves him.

    It’s kinda like those New Age speakers who give a bunch of empty platitudes that could reasonably mean any god damn, if you bite hard enough you’ll look for what you want to hear without even realizing it.









  • He didn’t do that. He said “show me. Ok, now show me under controlled conditions”.

    Except no he didn’t. The challenge was heavily criticized for among other things, having overly strict standards (moreso than most studies reasonably have), Randi himself having final say (no impartial judge), faking his own research, and him downright refusing any participants that weren’t using the same three stage tricks he debunked again and again.

    I am not saying Psi is real or anything of the sort. I am saying that those who promote themselves as skeptics must be willing to be scientific or they’re just kooks working “for the other team”

    To pretend Randi was scientific about his approach in the slightest is an insult to the the scientific method itself.

    While I do not endorse the views and research of parapsychologist Rupert Sheldrake, he was asked about why he didn’t take on the challenge and what he had to say was deeply informative.

    https://youtu.be/LLjUTvaKgdQ?

    Now I’m not saying Sheldrake is anything amazing. I’m asking… why do we have a quack like Sheldrake sticking to the scientific method better than Randi? Why is Sheldrake the guy claiming dogs are psychic coming off as the guy talking sense?

    How much ammo does that give woo peddlers?

    It’s not enough to yell “FAKE!” As loud as you can and talk like you’re writing a rational wiki article. You need to actually stand for science and the scientific method otherwise you send horrible messages about what is and isn’t evidence and give New Age whackjobs the floor to say “Well if Randi has to fake studies, something Sheldrake caught him doing, to debunk psychic powers, why are we still questioning psychic powers?”




  • I believe it is something simple we do not yet have the capacity to measure and that which can not be recreated as an AI.

    Why do I believe it exists? Because I experience it constantly.

    I am going to tell you something based on a true story about a spring in Rome believed to cure disease. For centuries even after the fall of the Empire fell people flocked to it believing the Gods blessed it with healing properties.

    The scientific minded said bad to the whole thing and assumed it nothing but a legend that fools took stock in. However people continued to come and be healed, no one could explain it.

    Until the invention of the Geiger Counter and the discovery of radiation.

    The legend had been true all along. The spring had been mildly radioactive! It was killing off what was killing the patrons!

    No one had anyway of knowing until suddenly they did.

    I believe conciousness to be a similar story that we haven’t seen the end of. Perhaps free will is one as well.