• SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m surprised this isn’t the central plot device of some blockbuster property.

    • Mesophar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They didn’t make a movie, but The Forever War is one of my all time favorite novels and deals with this situation exactly.

    • WldFyre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s an important world building device in the book Chasm City, by Alastair Reynolds. Which is a fantastic book, highly recommend!

  • becausechemistry@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Worse: your sleeper ship arrives at what should be a pristine planet. But FTL capable ships beat you there. And they ruined the planet over a few thousand years. And now they’re sending out refugee ships of their own.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    And for the only time in your life, you’re SO well rested!

    Oof, what if it turned out you get 3000 years of nightmares and wake up insane?

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I liked how it was in raised by we wolves where everyone shared a dream so the kids where technically older than their bodies.

      I know another shared dream hyper sleep where the guy in control went mad and tortured the crew until they band together to stop him. Then he arrived dead. I dk name.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Shouldn’t all biological processes be stopped. I’d assume you can’t even dream. You just go under and get back up instantly.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Elite Dangerous players flying loops around generation ships while listening to their horror downfall logs.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Who launches a space ship only half full?

      No room to take a second crew/passengers+their supplies (food/water) onboard, can’t exactly tow a space ship either (esp FTL)… So, help how?

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s an awful lot of cost and effort to launch a ship specifically for ‘rescuing’ another ship that’s not really in any trouble, it’s just a bit slow.

          It’s already got the supplies it needs, a set course, and a plan for when they arrive at their destination. It doesn’t really need help.

          Then there’s the problem of docking one ship with a second ship that likely wasn’t designed to/with a dock. That’s not a trivial task in a vacuum.

          TBH unless they are in some sort of distress; it seems better to let their plan play out. They’ll arrive when they were expecting to, and will have less work to do setting up a settlement when they arrive.

  • SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Or you arrive to find the civilization has had time to collapse and given way to the rise of damned dirty apes.

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s actually a pretty common sci fi scenario, I remember reading about it in a pop science book in school

      • IMongoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It was in The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, or in the series at least. His scenario was two warring planets sending out armadas to fight each other, but while they were on their way faster ships were created and sent so when they got there the battle was already over.

    • Naz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s stolen from Elite: Dangerous. You can find a few of those colony ships drifting around deep space, but you’re warned with heavy penalties to not interact with them, for this exact reason.

        • Naz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I mean fair, but the original ELITE was released in 1984 and is essentially the same science fiction universe. You’re right though, it’s not a new idea

  • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you have working FTL now, though, and can get there faster why not also intercept the sleeper ships and bring them with you?

    • trampel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Space is big. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it’s a long way down the road to the chemist’s, but that’s just peanuts to space.

      • Farid@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        3000 years is a lot. You can’t imagine how profoundly, unbelievably long that is. In just 65 years we went from the Wright brothers’ first flight to landing on the moon. And technological progress is exponential. Assuming people don’t all kill each other, in a couple hundred years, maybe a thousand, it will likely cost the humanity next to nothing to go pick them up, if they so desire.

      • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        A sleeper ship isn’t going to be doing any maneuvers other than constantly accelerating before the halfway point and then constantly decelerating after the halfway point. Predicting the position of the ship at any given moment based on that is a textbook physics 101 problem that students are expected to be able to solve by hand. If you’ve got FTL cracked then you’ve got the computational power to account for any real world variables that would throw off such a prediction.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You’re not quiet getting the scale of the problem.

          It’s like looking for a needle in a haystack. Except the haystack is 100km deep and covers the entire planet. But, you know that the needle should be some where in Manhattan.

          • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            It really isn’t. When you know where they started from, and what direction they were supposed to be heading in, then even without knowing how fast they’re supposed to be going, it’s literally as simple as dropping out of FTL at regular intervals behind the sleeper ship and pointing a telescope in the general direction you’re going until you hit the sleeper ship’s light cone. What other posters have suggested about potential technical limitations relating the nature of the FTL drive and/or logistical problems with actually doing a pick up make sense as blocking issues, but finding them to begin with is a solved problem. Like, this is basically “where are Voyager 1 & 2 right now”, and we actually know exactly where they are right now because we’re still picking up their radio signals, powered by a 249W generator (less power than used by a typical modern PC!), from over 136 AU out, and a sleeper ship is going to be way more visible than that.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Maybe they are like people today (or Ferengis in Star Trek) and just don’t care, not seeing any profit in the endeavor.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Pure sci-if speculation: Your FTL (or near-c) tech is reliant on a deep gravitational well or a strong radiation source (like a star) to stop. I can see a sci-go scenario where that is the case.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe if you had FTL, but chances are you’d still be limited on fuel and supplies

      You have to slow down to the sleeper ship to intercept it, and then speed up again with that extra mass, it probably wouldn’t be practical unless the ship was designed for it

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s a good argument against trying sleeper/generation ships.

    In practice, though, the actual sleepers would be so happy to arrive to find a nice McDonalds and a charming small town instead of shuttling down into the middle of uninhabited Arrakis with a 3D printer and a prayer.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’d argue the type of people who sign up to be first on an extra-solar planet to settle are exactly the kind of people who would rather shuttle down with a printer and a prayer than find a small town.

      I mean, if I were to sign on, I would want to know what the settlement plan is (Like who’s doing what jobs, how will we produce food assuming there is 0 viable land to grow on, what’s the worst case scenario that has been planned for, etc) as well as having a say in said plan… And I know plenty of people who would happily sign on knowing it’s gonna be just them, a tarp, and a Gransfors Bruks axe vs everything the planet can throw at them and they might die inside a week if they aren’t careful.

      And yeah, I imagine if I showed up and all the super hard work was done but everything was still getting started, I’d probably be a little more upbeat. But in no way would I want to see a planet filled with people who got there first. Worse yet, got there by being the 8th generation to be born there.

      I guess it depends what stage of the colonization effort you’re on. People signing on for the tail end would be ecstatic, probably.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why waste your hate on it? I haven’t had McDonald’s in over 25 years now and it causes me no problems to just go past one and not think about it

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Humans being humans, I bet there would end up being some huge animosity between the two groups.

    • voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      In practice, though, the actual sleepers would be so happy to arrive to find a nice McDonalds and a charming small town instead of shuttling down into the middle of uninhabited Arrakis with a 3D printer and a prayer.

      As a guy who sometimes gets told “Hey, don’t worry about that work you had to do, you can skip it”, hard agree. No better feeling in the world. And after thinking you’d have to build a whole civilisation from scratch? Yeah, nah, sign me up for the generation ship please.

      • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Imagine if a lost Spanish armada finally arrived at Florida, centuries late, musket-wielding conquistadors raiding a coastal naval academy while a prominent political VIP was giving a speech, taking them hostage like Hernán Cortés did with Moctezuma II (Aztec Empire) or Francisco Pizarro with Atahualpa (Inca Empire).

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        A generation ship and a sleeper ship are two different things (that we can’t yet do). In one, you live on a ship so your kids can go to a new place. In the other, you don’t really live on a ship so you can go to a new place.

    • Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      But is it a good argument? What are the chances a new technologies will be invented that allow for ships that are actually substantially faster? And what are the chances of some conflict or disaster or combination preventing any ships from being built regardless of how fast those ships are?

      My view is: As soon as technology is ready there’s an actual 1% chance of a successful mission, launch right away. And keep on launching till you can’t launch anymore. Sure maybe something better will come along, but maybe it won’t. If the window of opportunity is open, don’t wait for it to close.

      But in reality I don’t actually think interstellar travel for living humans is possible. There are so many issues, it’s hard to see us overcoming us all. But maybe the state of the world has left me jaded and the future will be bright somehow, who knows. I’d love to be proven wrong, but for now I lean of the side of impossible.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You kind of answer your own question there, honestly. If you’re at the point where you can somehow convince hundreds to thousands of people to get a one way ticket to turning into a space popsicle for the chance of eventually turning into xenomorph chowder, then you can probably also do better than that eventually.

        So from that perspective we both hard agree that interstellar travel is probably not practical to any degree of technology below full-on Star Trek. But also, we both hard disagree that “shoot people into space to die as soon as you have the ability” is something that any society is ever going to do. If some modicum of a survival instinct is needed to evolve intelligence, then the answer to the Fermi paradox is that aliens looked at the practicalities of actual interstellar travel and went “Hell, no”.

        If anybody out there is willing to do interstellar colonization you better believe that it’s because their star is about to pop and they’ll try that exactly once.

        • Thorry84@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Agreed. I always try to think of these kinds of questions in two ways.

          The first way is from a hard sci-fi perspective, like how can this become a believable thing. How can we change as little as possible in the universe to make this a real and normal thing, so we can expect a reader to have enough suspend of disbelief to serve as a good backdrop to a story. This way it’s fun to think about these things and see how we can still be living in the real world, but with something cool added. Instead of going full “it’s just magic” and thus cutting out any thought proces.

          The second way is from a real life standpoint. Like if we extrapolate our technology into the future, but keep in mind real life limitations, laws of physics etc. So no over unity, no FTL, nothing that would require the power of a star to work but also somehow not be an actual star etc.

          So that’s how you can easily get to two kinds of answers from a singular question. And it’s all speculation anyways, just a bit of fun.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          First, there have always been people who have thought, “I’m fine with the chance of dying to do this thing.” Free climbers, for instance. If the odds of survival are zero, and your personal effort isn’t going to change it, that number goes down by a lot.

          Second, unless we find a FTL solution, surviving in space indefinitely is the first step in interstellar travel, because 3000 years is functionally equivalent to indefinitely. If you’re response to that is sleeper ships, you only survive if the ship survives, and we’re back to the same point. The reason this is important is because if the planet at the destination isn’t required for your survival, you have a lot more flexibility for how you colonize that planet, which vastly improves the odds of success.

          As for the Fermi paradox, it doesn’t require that everyone wants to colonize a different star, build a Dyson shell, or whatever, it requires that everyone who doesn’t want to do that be willing to do whatever it takes to stop anyone else from doing it (and can make it count). It’s a slightly different proposition, and one that I think is less likely than other solutions.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s a good argument against trying sleeper/generation ships.

      But then you never send out ships. (Unless you do like embryos or something.)

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The obvious solution to this is to just not send the faster shios to the new planet, or do but use it as a hub for further travel, and let the sleeper ship people fulfill their literal purpose.

        Celebrate them and support them theres more planets why even bother?

        The sleeper ship people would be going to a planet chosen because it was able, the faster ship people would likely be able to choose a better planet anyway.

        But also could just meet up with that sleeper ship and like take them with you

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The science answer would be there’s probably not that many suitable planets. And probabilities of ships not making it means sending additional ships is a good idea.

          • Jarix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Hard disagree on that answer. We have found thousands of possible planet candidates already and we aren’t looking that hard, relatively. The second we have the technical capability to actually get to any other solar system there will be a new instrument in space with the explicit purpose of finding planets we want to travel to

            Edit. This new instrument will not magically appear, i meant we will start the process of building one and putting it in place asap

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Possible candidates. Because we don’t have the ability to actually know. And it has to be habitable to humans, agriculture, and animal husbandry, which is much stricter than possible (bacteria) life.

              As for using new planets for further exploration, it’s possible but will take time to develop the industry (while trying to build your new planet) and watch space for new targets.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Imagine trying to escape humanity only to end up being surrounded by humans again. Nightmare fuel.