• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Eh, using a phone w/o a case is reasonable. I’d liken it more to watching live TV. Why do that in the era of streaming services when you can (well, could) avoid ads and watch exactly what you want instead of whatever slop the network decides you should watch?

  • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Sharing another app suggestion(s) for Android: Tubular [0] or the more up-to-date LastPipeBender [1].

    Both apps differ from NewPipe and its variants by integrating with PeerTube along with YouTube, apart from providing features like SponsorBlock and ReturnYouTubeDislike.

    I have started using PeerTube much more often as my subscriptions from YouTube and PeerTube are now shown together, which makes for a seamless and superior experience altogether.

    [0] https://github.com/polymorphicshade/Tubular [1] https://github.com/MaintainTeam/LastPipeBender

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s a chance ad blockers are eating up the ‘Skip’ button while also failing to block the ad.

    A CHANCE?

    • NudeNewt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Only trash adblockers like Adblock Plus and Adguard have that “chance”. uBlock Origin the goat fr frf

  • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Youtube is like that bully that asks for your lunch money and when you say no, they slam you into a locker.

    When you say no again, they start hitting you until you finally give that lunch money.

    Once you do, they will show you the others are being abused harder when they demand more money from you.

    I would love to contribute to the end of youtube.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Look, I don’t disagree with you. YouTube has many flaws and they’ve rapidly enshittified to increase monetization. But YouTube is a far more complex* operation than your ISP. It took a decade to start making a profit on YouTube.

      The amount of hardware behind it is insane. The amount of work behind it is insane. A lot of that work is performed by really expensive software engineers in the US and Europe.

      It was never sustainable from the get-go. Not with a single pre-watch ad and no premium tier, anyway. They HAD to add more ads and a premium ad-free tier. Where I disagree with them is the amount of ads and the cost of the premium tier.

      *The big cloud providers (including Google) have grown so big, they don’t use ISPs in the traditional sense to connect their data centers. They run their own subsea cables between continents to improve connectivity. Whether or not you like the companies, they put a LOT of work into keeping you on their platforms. Of course this is for Google Cloud customers, but YouTube basically IS a Google Cloud customer. Just an in-house one.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Youtube is like that bully

      Except no one is forcing you to face that bully.
      You can simply stay away.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Then you’re choosing to use their service without paying, and don’t get to complain.

      • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Most people are lazy and not willing to make their life less comfortable. If they were, a lot of problems in big tech would not even exist. That’s why people still buy apple, use WhatsApp and microsoft instead of the free alternatives - because its less comfortable.

        They want change, but are unwilling to be a factor in causing that change.

    • nepenthes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I’m laughing at their response. Obviously someone used a thesaurus to write it and didn’t know that “incalcitrant” is not even the word, no major dictionaries list it. It’s like using irregardless instead of regardless The word they wanted is recalcitrant.

      And it’s very telling that they used that word because it shows they think they are king.

      Recalicitrant:

      Stubbornly resistant to authority or control.

      Unwilling to obey orders or to do what should be done.

      Resisting authority or control; not obedient or compliant.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    How about this, do a profit sharing agreement with channels. If a channel makes money from YouTube, YouTube gets a cut, and let the channel decide whether to run ads, use sponsor segments, post affiliate links, etc. If they choose to not monetize at all, they pay a monthly fee for hosting.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    We’ve launched a global effort to urge viewers with ad blockers enabled to allow ads on YouTube or try YouTube Premium for an ad free experience.

    By drastically increasing the rates every 6 months. Raising it past the prices of actual production streaming services. And paying the people making the content less and less money, until they have to put their own ads and their own content.

  • Pixlbabble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I dropped all my subs and only have youtube premium. I hate ads and I watch a lot of tubes. I don’t feel bad about it since they share revenue with creators.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Damn, lemmy is over here upset that you pay for something you like and use frequently.

      YouTube creators have said many times they get a lot more from a premium view compared to a regular one.

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Dude the value google gets out of creators’ videos vastly outstrips the paltry “share” they give them. If you aren’t consistently dropping multiple videos with 5-10,000,000 views a month you can’t make it And in order to hit those numbers you must resort to scummy and clickbait-y tactics. You’re lucky if you don’t burnout from the required output to make it financially viable.

      Fuck google, fuck YouTube premium/ads. Freetube all day.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        what I mean is a model where a subscription is required to watch anything. Even that is more graceful than the hacky 1 hour long youtube video solution to their problems.

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      They have and most users are still around because the alternatives are far too light on content. The creators drive the show, not the users.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Do you mean the promoted content done by the youtubers themselves? Because there are no YouTube ads when you use Premum.

        And Premium recently came out with a feature that makes it really easy to skip the promotional content.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The problem is hosting (storage, network) is expensive.

      IIRC some platforms (feddit.org, catbox.moe) pays $1000 per month, and that’s mostly just static images.

      Videos is much more than that. Who pays for that?

      • 0x0@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I have a hunch Linus at LTT could float his own storage for whatever stuff he wants to host. The same way you and me have to pay for our own online storage.

        • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Hosting is only half the equation you have to be able to serve it people all around the world at once with no buffering. People have no clue how amazing YouTube is for a free service. Bandwidth costs a fuckload of money too to add to the hosting cost.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, that would mean everybody pays for hosting videos themselves. The question is: is that a viable strategy / are users willing to put up with that.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Tell you the truth, once upon a time I really didn’t mind the ads. In fact I was quite happy to support the creators that I like with watching the ads that appeared on their videos. But then YouTube started getting smarmy by blocking my suggestions because I didn’t use history on my account. And then there’s the problem of the ads getting longer. At which point I got fed up and downloaded the adblock software to stop seeing this garbage. And then this little war broke out over ads on the platform.

      Quite frankly, so long as the people who make the software to block ads continue to do that kind of work I will continue to download their software and make Google spend boatloads of their own money to try to block the blockers. Because the blockers aren’t going anywhere. Not to mention that the blockers were not quite as popular before Google started this little campaign. And now they have made people so hyper aware of the fact that they can actually go out and find some way to skip these stupid ads that they’ve basically dug their own grave. Broadcast TV spent decades on this failed quest.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, me too.

        I liked watching ads 12 years ago, they were a funny interjection/change.

        Nowadays the ads are so extremely obnoxious, it feels as if they’re poisoning my mind. No way i’m even gonna watch them for a second.

      • el_eh_chase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I was the exact same way. I could justify watching ads to support the people I watched, but then I learned how little compensation a creator actually gets from one view and decided my time was more valuable. Plus I just got too used to never seeing ads and could never go back.

        This video sums up the sentiment you’re describing nicely.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Exactly right. Two 15 second ads in between shows two midstream 15 to 30 second ads, I was perfectly fine with watching those ads.

        When they started letting content creators pick the number of ads, and they started letting more than 30 seconds of ads per break, now I have incentive to block them.

        Capitalism dictates that they need to make 20% more every year. They cannot continue to get 20% more ad revenue every year without increasing ads substantially.

        When a handful of companies owns everything and they can no longer buy new companies up to make more money, They can’t make their numbers. All they can do is gut us for the last 20% and then go out of business.

    • Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Peertube looks good… but has nearly no content or content creators, which is the reason Google nearly has monopoly with Youtube

      • moseschrute@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not a fediverse thing, but I pay $5 a month for nebula. I think it’s worth it to support creators. And I believe the whole “if you’re not paying for something you’re the product”. Though you can still be the product even if you do pay.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          I ended up getting a lifetime subscription, and it’s definitely worth it, but it’s not a replacement for YT entirely.

          Dropout.tv has good comedy videos which is largely lacking from Nebula, but I find it buffers more often for me, which makes it uniquely bad among all the streaming services I’ve used.

          But, I watch plenty of fan compilations / animatics for stuff on YT from my recommendations, and I haven’t found them anywhere else either because they don’t exist or because they don’t get recommended to me. It seems difficult for that kind of stuff to exist without free, easy uploads AND free, easy viewing.

          Finally there are some people that primarily do Twitch that I subscribe to on YT. I’ve tried watching them on Twitch, and I prefer the content after their YT editor has worked their magic.

          • moseschrute@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Dropout.tv was created by college human right? Idk if their old videos would hold up today, but I remember liking their content. Nice to know they’re still around.

            • bss03@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yeah, they even finally rebranded the YT channel last year so it is now Dropout instead of CollegeHumor. They are doing some interesting stuff currently (Gamechanger is almost always good), and all their old sketches and programs are there too.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Is there any competitor like Nebula that’s not solely focused on informational/longform videos? I come from the age when hobbyists made silly memetic animations and shared them around, not even necessarily for profit. I’m sure many of those people consider YouTube to be some level of evil and would enjoy an alternative that’s actually organic.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            They have a $30/ year annual subscription (I’m not certain if that’s a purely introductory rate or not). Most of the content is non-exclusive but it’s ad-free and many creators remove the sponsor segments or even include exclusive content on their Nebula version. It seems pretty worthwhile to me

          • 3migo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m also a Nebula subscriber for the same reason stated above. A lot of my favorite creators are on Nebula and either post their videos a week or two early on Nebula, or post extended versions of their videos on Nebula.

            There’s no ads or sponsorship segments, so it makes for a pleasant experience. Admittedly, the Nebula “originals” which are exclusive to Nebula, is a fairly small catalogue. But what is there is high quality.

            The Nebula subscription is worth it for me to support creators and have a better viewing experience… And to see each Jetlag episode a week early.

            • moseschrute@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Tbh I dont use it enough, but I love that’s it no ads like you said. Also feels good to support creators instead of Google. I’ll check out the originals!

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    While the company stops short of directly saying as much, it sure feels like the preposterously long ads we’re seeing here are an example of one tool in Google’s arsenal for effectively disabling YouTube playback for violators of the site’s ToS.

    I don’t get it. When my adblocker works, I don’t get to see this shit. Only if it fails I’llbe confronted with hour-long ads, so the incentive to find a better blocker is even higher?

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      They are trying hard to block all known adblockers. And if they ever do, this will become a serious problem.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          This is a war that was fought by broadcast TV and the makers of videotapes, DVDs, and blu-rays. In every case the Corpos failed. So no, this arms race is and will be won by the ad blockers.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Except all of those formats are now obsolete, no major company is even making Blu-Ray players anymore, and people have moved on to others. So did they fail or did they just find a different method? I’d say the latter. How many people do you know with a working VCR at this point?

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            In this case though the arms dealers make the arms for free so I’m kind of okay with it

            • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              There are arms dealers on both sides. Anti-adblockers also require development, and I doubt anyone does that for free.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              And all of it could have been avoided if google just audited/policed the ads it served. No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform.

              But rather than spend money expanding their ad department to audit and police the adds, they are spending gobs and gobs of money trying to force people to see view virus-delivering ads, racist ads, blatant misinformation, etc.

              No one wants to be forced to spend 30 minutes watching a pragerU video on how the black man should be grateful for slavery and all the “good” its brought him

              But that seems to be the world that google wants.

              • Klear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                No sane person minds watching a 5-10 second add every 10-20 minutes to support the platform.

                Fuck that. Ads are cancer. Willing consuming cancer is insanity.

              • OR3X@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Remember when Google aquired YouTube and stated they didn’t intend to change anything? Remember when the only ads were those little banners you had to close? We’ve come such a long ways from where we started and what is considered “sane” these days would have been an affront back then. Google truly did slow boil the frog.