• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    How about this, do a profit sharing agreement with channels. If a channel makes money from YouTube, YouTube gets a cut, and let the channel decide whether to run ads, use sponsor segments, post affiliate links, etc. If they choose to not monetize at all, they pay a monthly fee for hosting.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    We’ve launched a global effort to urge viewers with ad blockers enabled to allow ads on YouTube or try YouTube Premium for an ad free experience.

    By drastically increasing the rates every 6 months. Raising it past the prices of actual production streaming services. And paying the people making the content less and less money, until they have to put their own ads and their own content.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      No no no…don’t hit them. That leaves a mark. Instead, hold them down, and tickle them for an hour.

      Then if they try to go to the police, and say “they tickled me!” the cops will just laugh. And, no marks.

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The only reason adblockers would be to blame would be because Google wanted to make up for lost revenue, similar to the myth of high end department stores having high prices because they expect their customers to shoplift.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The funny thing is using a good adblocker and I haven’t noticed a single youtube ad, so if they’re to blame, they’re also the solution. I don’t see how this move functionally does anything other than punish those who can’t block ads.

        • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          People that know what ad blockers are frequently use them. The act of punishing the group that isn’t aware of adblockers simply will drive more users to discover/make use of them.

          • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            “We have to punish you because of what those other people are doing to legitimately evade punishment” is only a useful argument if the punished group can somehow cover for those not affected.

            • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Exactly. It’s a tired argument that’s been made in a lot of different mediums. It’s not worked in any of them.

          • Rooty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Remember those unskippable anti-piracy DVD ads that only paying customers saw? The media industry has learned jack shit during the last 30 years.

  • Pixlbabble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I dropped all my subs and only have youtube premium. I hate ads and I watch a lot of tubes. I don’t feel bad about it since they share revenue with creators.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Damn, lemmy is over here upset that you pay for something you like and use frequently.

      YouTube creators have said many times they get a lot more from a premium view compared to a regular one.

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Dude the value google gets out of creators’ videos vastly outstrips the paltry “share” they give them. If you aren’t consistently dropping multiple videos with 5-10,000,000 views a month you can’t make it And in order to hit those numbers you must resort to scummy and clickbait-y tactics. You’re lucky if you don’t burnout from the required output to make it financially viable.

      Fuck google, fuck YouTube premium/ads. Freetube all day.

  • endofline@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They force paying customers ( yt music premium & yt premium ) to disable ad blockers, too. Why? If I accordingly to the contract shouldn’t get any ads why they would need to punish for blocking ads which shouldn’t exist :-)?

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They don’t. I use ad blockers and pay for a premium subscription. Everything works fine without disabling the blockers.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You aint getting the ads but they still need you to load the trackers mate.

      It is for your own safety, taker your pants off, boy

    • Soapbox1858@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I pay for YT premium and use unlock origin + privacy badger and don’t see any ads on YT.

  • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    One solution to that problem is to close YouTube on your device and do something else with your time.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    While the company stops short of directly saying as much, it sure feels like the preposterously long ads we’re seeing here are an example of one tool in Google’s arsenal for effectively disabling YouTube playback for violators of the site’s ToS.

    That makes no sense at all. It isn’t like skipping ads results in a black screen for the length of the ad.

    People with adblockers aren’t going to see hour long ads or black screens when they don’t see ads in the first place.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m cool with that. but only because I’ll open 300 tabs all playing the same hour long ad on a remote PC and play them while I sleep.

      let them chew through their finite bandwidth when there’s millions of people doing the same thing.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        All that does is make YouTube money while costing money to the advertisers.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          How long do you think those advertisers will stay when it turns out they’ve paid $1M in advertising with no change in sales?

          • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I hear what you are saying but the truth is that they will stay, just so they aren’t missing, regardless of ROI. Case in point is Xitter. The numbers clearly state that the level of engagement and sales conversion from Xitter ads is pitiful, especially when compared to Bluesky, yet advertisers still hang in there…just in case.

            • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s because at a certain point ads become less about direct sales, and more about brand recognition. This is why Coke has a massive advertising budget. You know what Coke is. You’re either going to buy a Coke or you’re not. But by advertising as heavily as they do, they’re reminding you that they exist.

              That’s why their heaviest advertising season is Christmas. Some of the advertisements don’t even show their product. Some do, but some just show Santa flying his sleigh with cheery christmas music. Then their Coke logo gets spelled out in the stars as he passes by.

              It’s just so you assosiate their brand with good emotions. But it requires an almost constant barrage of ads, and it’s direct sales are impossible to measure.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            The advertising team will just blame it on something else. They have the numbers showing their ads are being watched, everything else is conjecture.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think Google doesn’t care about that at all.

        They most likely pay peanuts compared to you for “bandwidth” (which for them is more of an electricity cost and trough-output allocation than a specific numeric value like consumers and smaller companies have). You also cache the video on your own device making the multiple tab thing useless if you don’t know what you’re doing. And Google can also just block you when they attack their servers, move traffic around, and so much more advanced stuff that protects their infrastructure.

        tl;dr: Trying to boycott Google by trying to waste their resources is useless.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          don’t care about their allotted price per GB. I care about their network throughput. can’t be faster than 200gbps at the switch and having millions of videos streaming simultaneously on top of their already network throughput would likely become an incident for the UX teams.

          • x00z@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            As I said it’s 100 times more advanced than that.

            They can switch IPs, datacenters, regions, whatever they want. They even have access to BGP routing.

            They also use some custom switches according to Wikipedia:

            The private side of the network is a secret, but a recent disclosure from Google[90] indicate that they use custom built high-radix switch-routers (with a capacity of 128 × 10 Gigabit Ethernet port) for the wide area network. Running no less than two routers per datacenter (for redundancy) we can conclude that the Google network scales in the terabit per second range (with two fully loaded routers the bi-sectional bandwidth amount to 1,280 Gbit/s).

          • TehWorld@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            200gig was surpassed what, 8 years ago? They have super active load balancing based on your region. You could purchase a Fiber gigabit line and only watch videos 24/7/365 and nobody at YouTube would ever notice.

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s hilarious that they think it would matter to anyone with an ad blocker. I haven’t seen an ad for years on youtube. Hell I haven’t even seen promotions in videos for a few months now that I found a sponsor segment blocker.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    While their statement is entirely correct, they’re still wrong. YouTube is basically unusable without an ad blocker. Multiple 10 to 15 second long unskippable ads before the video even starts, and unless you watch videos all the way through you end up watching as much ad as you do content. It is damn near impossible to hop around between videos trying to find the one you want because of the pre-roll ads on every vid. On the other hand, with an ad block enabled YouTube is actually quite nice. The engagement algorithm is fucking trash of course but if you know what you’re looking for and you go directly to it it’s pretty good.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Do you habitually not watch videos all the way through, or am I misunderstanding your comment?

      No judgement, you obviously should consume media in the manner you find most enjoyable, but once I start and enjoy a video - YouTube or otherwise - I tend to get invested and want to watch as much as is available.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you’re looking for tutorials or other immediately applicable information, you’ve often got to skip a LOT of bullshit before even determining if this video is relevant to you.

        "Hey everybody it’s Mike from Mike’s the guy named Mike, it’s a snowy day out there, I got my coffee, took my dog for a walk, it’s been the morning of a day, and now I’m out here in the garage and I figured I’d make a video about a topic a bunch of you have been asking me about. You guys have been asking me a lot lately “Hey, Mike’s the guy named Mike, could you show us how to properly lick a drill press?” Well let’s find out.

        10 second title screen because Mike thinks he’s making TV

        “So a lot of you guys have been asking me “Hey, Mike’s the guy named Mike, could you show us the right way to lick a drill press?” Before we get into that, be sure to leave a like, drop a comment below and be sure to subscribe. It’ll really help me out more than you can think…”

        19 minutes into a 21 minute video and there hasn’t been a drill press on screen yet.

        Three weeks later Mike’s the guy named Mike along with his entire family is killed in a rock slide. The UN declares it an international day of celebration.

        What was I talking about?

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You need to get sponsor block. Not only does it block all the sponsor segments because they are also ads, that the ad blockers don’t otherwise block, but they also block all of the other annoyances, like instructions to subscribe and intro animations.

          • AJ1@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            yeah that’s really the key to an acceptable youtube experience. after google nuked UBO on chromeOS, sponsorblock is still there to do the heavy lifting. I’ll be switching to a windows machine soon, but for now all I have is my chromebook, which is still functional even without the real UBO-- but I’m sure they’re working on a way to fuck us out of the “lite” version of it and take away extensions like sponsorblock

        • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I tried to watch one video from a guy on a specific topic and he opened with an update on his divorce. Coooool.

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          19 minutes into a 21 minute video and there hasn’t been a drill press on screen yet

          And that’s intentional. The algorithm rewards them for having people watch more / watch longer, and a 21 min video might have 2 or 3 ad rolls. If someone watches all the way thru, creator gets more money and higher placement in search results.

          I like YouTube as a concept but the algorithms are totally enshittifying it.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I remember the early, pre-Google days of Youtube, when it was fail videos, that one particular kind of lyric video, lonelygirl15 and mememolly. It was about the time South park had run that episode where they had all the people who had become internet famous like Tay Zonday and the Star Wars Kid who were sitting around in a waiting room waiting for their “internet money” to make the point that there was no method in place for them to monetize their fame…

            If you had asked me then what Youtube would look like in the year 2025 I don’t know what I would have said but I wouldn’t have guessed correctly. I probably would have said it’s not going to last that long. I would not have guessed that fifteen years of Google changing the algorithm, but not letting anyone know what they did or why, so there’s this constant game of trying to design video formats around what the software would promote would twist it into what it is…

        • highduc@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Brilliant 😄

          The way I see it these folks don’t respect my time when pulling off shit like this.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        When I’m ‘watching a video’ I watch it all the way thru. However often I’m looking for something specific, like how to do something, and a lot more tutorials are now in video form than written (which I don’t love but whatever). In that situation I’m usually looking for a specific piece of information which often requires scrubbing around in multiple videos. Same thing if I’m doing research on a product, while I might watch a review will the way through I’m more often looking for some specific things like video of the interface or does it have some specific setting or can I set it up without needing a phone app or cloud account. That requires scrubbing around in multiple videos to see bits of the setup UI. Unusable if each video has an ad

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          a lot more tutorials are now in video form than written (which I don’t love but whatever)

          One of my favorite Youtubers (Greg’s Airplanes and Automobiles) has excellent in-depth content mostly about WWII piston-engined aircraft with lots of detailed discussion and reference to original source materials. But it’s just him reading a written script while presenting still photos and excerpts from flight manuals and the like. It really would be perfect as a blog or in book form, but he has to turn it into videos in order to have any chance at making decent money from it. It’s just such a shame that this is how things are going now.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            This makes no sense to me. It’s significantly more expensive to create and host video content, yet somehow we’ve gotten to the point where that’s the most profitable? It makes no sense.

            • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s all about advertising. On a web page, which is cheap to create and cheap to host, the only ad you can really get is a pop-up or similar, and those don’t pay very much. On the video, which is expensive to create and expensive to host, you can have 30 or 45 seconds of video ads, which pay a lot more.

        • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          a lot more tutorials are now in video form than written (which I don’t love but whatever)

          You’re not alone in that, and it seems neither am I

  • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Sharing another app suggestion(s) for Android: Tubular [0] or the more up-to-date LastPipeBender [1].

    Both apps differ from NewPipe and its variants by integrating with PeerTube along with YouTube, apart from providing features like SponsorBlock and ReturnYouTubeDislike.

    I have started using PeerTube much more often as my subscriptions from YouTube and PeerTube are now shown together, which makes for a seamless and superior experience altogether.

    [0] https://github.com/polymorphicshade/Tubular [1] https://github.com/MaintainTeam/LastPipeBender

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Eh, using a phone w/o a case is reasonable. I’d liken it more to watching live TV. Why do that in the era of streaming services when you can (well, could) avoid ads and watch exactly what you want instead of whatever slop the network decides you should watch?