https://x.com/redditstatus/status/1836846532886417887?s=19
Yup even 3rd party clients are having issues
DAILY MAIL is a shit SHIT source.
But fuck reddit.
I hope AI is okay 🙏!.. It wasn’t us, oh great begin!
We may have our opinions about the qualities of Reddit. But the Daily Mail? I feel dirty, just having a link to that dump on my screen.
Voyager has an option to block specific websites/keywords which may be useful to you (depending on your device of choice). Not sure if other front ends have that but I think it’s worth looking into.
Not thousands enough
Just log in on another server… Duh!
Good! Now stay down!
Reddit down report #420 this year.
Tell me when AWS or something is down. Reddit goes down so often it becomes a nothing burger
This problem cannot happen to feddiverse? All nodes just queue sending to others?
Ask kbin.social
It can happen because communities and users are monolithic. You lose your home instance, you have to create a new account somewhere else. The community is located in the instance that goes down, you can no longer participate in it and its former members all have to scramble if they want to participate.
Your user is still linked to your home instance. If that goes down, you don’t have access to it. You can still browse Lemmy from other servers.
Literally thousands. That’s all the humans that are left.
Funny how they have the audacity to complain about this place being botted when their bot problem is so, SO much worse.
i dont think i’ve seen more than 3 botted users here lmao
Yeah there really are not that many here, and while there are probably more who hide in the background, it’s nowhere near what the Reddit scabs/stans claim when they talk shit about Lemmy and alternative platforms in general.
‘alternative is not ‘click 3 buttons’, therefore it sucks balls and no one should use it’
Oh he’s just juicing his beetle.
Its working as intended for me. Hence, I’m here.
Weird, it’s been down for me since June of last year.
Woah there pardner…
Yeah same.
Somewhat tangential question: Why do so many sites have links to an external status monitoring site, but when the site is down and you go to check the status on that external status monitoring site, it says everything’s fine? What’s the point of the status site if it doesn’t actually acknowledge that there’s any sort of outage nor provide any info on it?
There are a few options off the top off my head
- the route/connection between the monitoring and you is OK; between the company and the monitoring is OK; but between you and the company is not OK – this means that, so far as the monitoring can tell, the site is up.
- The status checks run at some interval and you’re hitting it before that interval
- There’s some threshold of errors that needs to happen first so tiny hiccups don’t register as full-blown outages.
- the monitoring/metrics are poorly-designed
There are probably other cases. I don’t know the architecture in this case, so I won’t speculate at any others.
Maybe it’s not automated and whoever is responsible isn’t awake yet.
Nice. ☺️