It’s sensible for businesses to shift from physical media sales. Per CNBC’s calculations, DVD sales fell over 86 percent between 2008 and 2019. Research from the Motion Picture Association in 2021 found that physical media represented 8 percent of the home/mobile entertainment market in the US, falling behind digital (80 percent) and theatrical (12 percent).

But as physical media gets less lucrative and the shuttering of businesses makes optical discs harder to find, the streaming services that largely replaced them are getting aggravating and unreliable. And with the streaming industry becoming more competitive and profit-hungry than ever, you never know if the movie/show that most attracted you to a streaming service will still be available when you finally get a chance to sit down and watch. Even paid-for online libraries that were marketed as available “forever” have been ripped away from customers.

When someone buys or rents a DVD, they know exactly what content they’re paying for and for how long they’ll have it (assuming they take care of the physical media). They can also watch the content if the Internet goes out and be certain that they’re getting uncompressed 4K resolution. DVD viewers are also less likely to be bombarded with ads whenever they pause and can get around an ad-riddled smart TV home screen (nothing’s perfect; some DVDs have unskippable commercials).

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean…I just bought Batman the animated series on DVD. Whole series too. I never got to watch it as a kid, but I hear it holds up even for adults.

    I also bought Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles DVD which has the first 3 movies from the 90s. The stupid Micheal Bay reboot from the 2010s, and also a movie called “Batman vs TMNT”. Which sounded bizzare enough for me to buy.

    Now I just need time to watch these things.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      May not be the same type of stuff, but I’ve seen comple box sets of shows like Courage the Cowardly Dog, Edd Ed N Eddy, and a few other shows for roughly around $30 a set at my local Walmart. It’s absolutely beautiful to see physical media box sets at a reasonable price crushes streaming prices.

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    No ads when you pause, but holy hell, we’ve been getting DVDs from the library, and sometimes it’s a good ten minutes of crap before the movie actually starts.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The end of Redbox marks another death knell for the DVD industry at a time when volatile streaming services are making physical media appealing again.

    But on Wednesday, Judge Thomas M. Horan of the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware approved a conversion to chapter 7, signaling the liquidation of business, per Deadline.

    Redbox’s remaining 24,000 kiosks will close, and 1,000 workers will be laid off (severance and back pay eligibility are under review, and a bankruptcy trustee will investigate if trust funds intended for employees were misappropriated).

    In April, Target confirmed that it will only sell DVDs in stores during “key times,” like the winter holiday season or the release of a newer movie to DVD.

    But as physical media gets less lucrative and the shuttering of businesses makes optical discs harder to find, the streaming services that largely replaced them are getting aggravating and unreliable.

    Still, places that offer DVDs have gotten significantly rarer recently, and relying solely on an increasingly cable-like streaming industry for home entertainment is a scary proposition.


    The original article contains 768 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yep. I’ve recently been collecting Criterion Collection blu-rays (and 4k BR in the case of Citizen Kane. Which was incredible btw. First time seeing it too) for some of my favorite films plus classics I haven’t seen yet. If you keep an eye out for sales you can get some really great stuff for under $20. Sometimes under $15.

      The picture quality is second to none, the bonus features are always amazing and actually worth checking out, and I own them outright forever.

      Edit: oh, you meant like actual old school regular DVDs… Fuck that

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I tried to watch a DVD lately (as in past few years). Holy. Yeah. Not as I remembered. It’s not even 720p. Looks like manure on my 65" 4K OLED. 💩 And the audio. I had to stop.

      I think it was Band Of Brothers? Had to download a 1080p boxset at least. Then it was consumable.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s one of those things were people have gotten used to 1080p or better and they remember DVD being pretty good, but when they go back, yeeesh. I remember thinking that about VHS vs DVD. Got used to DVD, remembered VHS being just fine, put a VHS on, oh boy.

    • Drusas@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve started buying DVDs and Blu-ray again after years of not doing so because there have been multiple instances of me purchasing a movie on some streaming platform and then it no longer being available. Also, there have been even more instances where it’s less expensive to buy the physical product and then rip it than it is to buy the digital copy.

    • t_berium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Physical media cannot be altered afterwards. That’s a thing Disney likes to do, for example.

      Plus maximum video and audio quality. Some people don’t watch movies on phones or laptops, you know.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Or store them on a portable hdd and have redundancy without hoarding shiny plastic discs.

        • bluGill@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I store the discs because while ripping is of questional legallity by having the discs I have the morals right.

          • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I find this to be an odd choice. No one is coming to your home to check. You KNOW you paid for the media. I’d throw the disks I know I would never use out, or sell them.

            • bluGill@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Nobody today is not coming to my house. However the world has not always changed in ways I like. If the media companies want to make an example of somebody they might randomly pick me. If I have physical media they will not be able to convince the general public I’m a dishonest thief and so even though I might be legally in the wrong for ripping DVDs they will stay away: they are going to look for someone who they can make look like a dishonest thief in the court of public opinion. They are not looking to take me to court and win whatever damaged they are owned from my activity (it will cost them about 100 times as much $$$ in lawyers fees - they would probably win but it isn’t worth it), what they would be looking for is to make an example in the news about how much someone loses and if I have physical media they instead look like jerks for enforcing a law on something that the generally public wouldn’t even call a crime.

            • Agrivar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              If you throw away perfectly fine physical copies, you are just contributing to the ever-increasing plastic waste poisoning our ecosystems, and if you sell them then your digital copies are now illegal. Just put them in a disc binder and stick 'em in a closet for fuck sake!

              • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                you are just contributing to the ever-increasing plastic waste poisoning our ecosystems

                so are you. they’re all going to end up in a landfill one way or another.

                Just put them in a disc binder and stick 'em in a closet for fuck sake!

                you mean throw the plastic case away?

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  If you’re going to sell the disks, just pirate instead, it’s the same in a legal sense (you have something you don’t have a legal claim to).

                  If you’re worried about space, get a disk binder or something. Disks aren’t that big, cases are, so ditch the case and keep the disk. I keep the disks too, but I have a ton of storage space.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I really don’t understand why they don’t include this stuff on streaming services.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because the discs will safely store that data for decades longer than any of your hard drives will likely work.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because the current trend is to ensure the consumer owns less and less and just pays monthly for access rights.

  • StaySquared@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    At first I was cool with buying digital copies of movies from streaming services, when they first offered them. Until my neighbor apparently got his account suspended and had absolutely no access to all the digital copies of movies he had bought. I then realized… it’s true, we’re entering an age of, “you will own NOTHING and be happy”.

    So I rather support pirates.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have a 4k BluRay player I picked up for cheap. But I only have like 2 movies for it.

        • Peffse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I thought those players only worked on special 3D TVs? I’ve never tried the feature because my TVs are always the cheap ones.

          • Toes♀@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah it does require a tv with that feature. Mine supports it but I’ve never thought to try it because it needs glasses. (and probably won’t because they are expensive last I checked)

    • Schorsch@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Some people pay in order to be able to anonymously download movies. (Totally not me though, as that’s illegal.)

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I have no issues paying for movies, as long as they’re actually mine. I have major issues with paying for a limited license to stream a movie, until the streaming service decides to end their contract and the streaming rights get clawed back without a refund. If purchasing isn’t owning, then piracy isn’t theft.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I will buy 4k blue rays of movies I like but if that isn’t available, eat ass and get fucked I’ll steal your shit and you get nothing.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yup, but only physical media, not streaming services or anything with online DRM. If I can’t play their media offline legally, I’ll find other ways of getting that data to work offline.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s sensible for businesses to shift from physical media sales.

    Sensible to who?

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Physical is practically dead.

      One by one I’ve seen pretty much any shop that specialises in physical media go bust. Virgin Megastores, HMV, Blockbuster, Game. The media section in my local supermarkets have gone from several aisles of games and movies, down to a single rack of recent releases. Even in gaming, I’ve had my disc PS5 for two years now, and the only thing I’ve put in it was Top Gun on 4K disc. The other games (BG3, Talos Principle 2) I purchased weren’t even available on disc.

      Consumers don’t want it in large numbers, so they stop making it.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’ve had my disc PS5 for two years now, and the only thing I’ve put in it was Top Gun on 4K disc

        You are really missing out then, because if you know where to look (like psprices.com) you will often find sales on only physical copies at Amazon, Best Buy or GameStop.

        I’m talking like significant sales. Like AAA games less than a year old (that still costs $60 on PSN) for $15.99 kind of sales.

        I cannot tell you how many PS4 and PS5 games I’ve gotten, and which, for 40%+ off. Too many to count. I’ve saved hundreds if not over a thousand dollars doing this.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Really? Because used media stores are booming all over the place. Stores that sell new and used records alongside CDs, Movies, and video games seem to be in every mid size town I pass through.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The smaller towns like mine feel the effects first. It’ll trickle up.

          Game went that way, eventually being taken over by the used section, and now all we have left locally is CEX, which is used only. Most of the prices are about the same as buying new from Amazon. Anything really cheap is often the same stuff in subscription services.

          Game still exists, but it’s tucked away at the back of Sports Direct shops in out of town shopping centres, and their main products appear to be plushies and funko pops.

          It is dying, and I’m not convinced it can be saved at this point. Who has a CD player any more? DVD players have gone from a £30 box that everyone had to something stuffed in the attic and the apps are built into the TV. A 4K BR player is still £150+ even for a cheap one. You don’t even get Dolby Vision at that price point. I don’t expect the next generation of consoles to have disc drives at all.

          Physical media is on life support, and it won’t be long before they pull the plug completely.

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            When I think small town, I’m thinking a couple hundred people. I’ve never seen such stores there. Medium is a few thousand. They usually have one.

            The nice thing is that there are millions of discs and players still out there. For anyone who prefers physical media and avoids streaming (this guy!) there is no shortage. Prices could stand to come down. But even if they do quit making them, there are lifetimes worth of vintage media, and newer isn’t always better.

            • Blackmist@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m talking a town of 35,000-40,000 people. There is not a single dedicated new physical media shop here. The most we have is the rack in the supermarkets. It all went online to Amazon, etc, and now it doesn’t look like it has long there either.

              And while that old media will last a decent while, it doesn’t last forever. The discs degrade, and fairly soon compared to CDs. Like 25 years or so.

              And if nobody is making discs any more, the drives won’t be far behind. It’s full of moving parts, so stock up on them. It happened to floppy discs, it’ll happen to optical discs too.

              • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I didn’t say new store, I said vintage. If you don’t have one, I’d be surprised. There’s gonna be one somewheres nearby.

                As for aging media, you’re right about that. Best make sure we reform copyright law soon. They don’t deserve to gatekeep the entire world’s cultural history.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      For all the reality of “streaming rights are a shitshow”, what percentage of the population do you think is willing to buy physical movies?

      Because I don’t think it’s all that high.

      • dan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Someone go make Steam for videos and I’ll pay for media again. My stipulations are:

        • Once I buy it, it’s mine forever (otherwise piracy is better)
        • The file is high quality, DRM free, and in a selection of standard formats (otherwise piracy is better)
        • I can redownload it from the service at any time (otherwise piracy is better)
        • I can get everything I want to watch (otherwise piracy is better)
        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Steam satisfies only your third point, though. Otherwise, no. You don’t actually own your Steam library, Steam itself is DRM, and it doesn’t have everything.

          • dan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I know, I modified it to make more sense for video.

            • paraphrand@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              So then we have iTunes. The only one it does not cover is the permanent ownership. Companies have yanked stuff from iTunes libraries before.

              • thejml@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                That’s why you download it. Luckily iTunes m4a files are high quality and unlocked so I can instantly play them in anything, even my Synology apps.

                Video isn’t the same though. That’s all still encrypted.

        • SGG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Companies see that as a mistake. They want you on a subscription for life that they can arbitrarily change at any time.

          Profits not increasing enough for this quarter? Better cut content, increase prices, increase the number of ads.

          Profits increased amazingly this quarter? Better cut content, increase prices, increase the number of ads.

          Profits down? Better cut content, increase prices, increase the number of ads, and start adding extra paywalls to some content

          They want you to own nothing. Oh you unsubscribed? Sorry even the content you paid extra to unlock was only available while your subscription continued, you will need to start your subscription again and then pay to unlock the content again.

          A show isn’t popular enough? Better write it off, pull it from all distribution so you can claim it as a tax write off

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I wouldn’t even mind the subscription if all the content was there reliably, and I only needed one.

            I subscribe to a music service, because all the music is there and it’s easier than swiping it.

            If I had to subscribe to four different ones to get access to all the artists I listen to, then I’d still be pirating that.

        • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          FYI Steam had videos a few years ago, new purchases are discontinued but one can still playback their existing library.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I honestly don’t mind copy protections, I just don’t like online DRM. If the service is good enough, I’ll look past that particular portion.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Not necessarily. DVDs and Blurays have copy protections, but they don’t require access to any servers. Online DRM sucks because if your internet goes out, their servers are having troubles, or they just shut down the servers for whatever reason, you cannot use your media.

              So I’m mostly fine with offline copy protections (someone will crack it eventually), I’m not okay with DRM that requires online access.

          • dan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I won’t. “Copy protection” is much more about restricting and potentially even removing your access to something you’ve paid for than it is about preventing copying. I am not willing to buy something that can be revoked when alternatives are available.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Offline copy protection, like the copy protection in DVDs and Bluray, can’t be revoked, they’re literally designed to be static. It’s really not an issue since, given time, it’ll be cracked (and both are, I literally just finished ripping my collection). I’m fine with that form of copy protection, I’m not fine with online-only DRM because that’s totally revokable.

              • dan@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Disagree. In order to keep those keys secure they can’t publish them, so they’ll have to license some sort of decryption chip. That just pushes the price up as some manufacturer ends up taking a cut from every player sale.

                Also means you can’t do what you want with it. You probably can’t play it on an open source device. Etc etc.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Sure, I’d need specific hardware to access the media, but after I rip it, I can access it anywhere. The benefit to me of something like a Bluray isn’t the disk itself, but being able to legally buy media and rip it to a digital format at home. That’s a legally gray area since breaking copy protection measures is technically a copyright violation, but there’s also legal protection for backing up media for personal use, so it’s a bit of a gray area.

                  Given that there are no other legal or mostly legal alternatives, I’m satisfied with that as an option. Media companies rarely, if ever, go after people who rip media for personal use (probably because it’s not worth their time and it’s a legal gray area), so I’m okay with that status quo. If there were a legal option to get DRM-free media for offline use, I’d totally go for that. I tried that with streaming services, but the apps I used (Netflix and Disney+) failed when I actually needed them (my downloaded files “expired” on a trip when I didn’t have internet access), so that’s not going to work for me.

                  If this legally gray area goes away and I can’t easily rip media into a DRM-free format for personal use, I’ll go back to the alternatives I used when I couldn’t afford physical media and Netfilx wasn’t yet a thing.

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, the costs to actually make and distribute a physical disc are relatively low on a unit basis, but the cost of distributing a digital copy online make physical media look astronomical.

        • Arbiter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Even outside of cost, the level of control they can exert is vastly higher than any physical media.

          Being able to prevent someone from reselling the movie or game they bought is very appealing to rights holders.

      • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        And customers. Almost everyone prefers to consume media in a simple way and that is streaming. Almost no one will go back to physical media. If streaming becomes absolutely unbearable, people would turn to digital downloads.