• Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Have a good read, it’s interesting if you like manufactured drama for the sake of publicity.

      • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Huh, that comic and the responses makes me realize how much people can’t notice their own blind spots, including within the comic itself.

        Like in this section with people saying it’s exaggerated or nobody actually talks like that (because they don’t ever perceive it in real life and it seems to ridiculous to be real), and the comic referenced in your link where she says if men were responded to that way, because she apparently can’t see that it is how men are responded to for many of those things, because she’s so used to seeing women as the victims of that stuff perpetrated by mostly men (which is reasonable! What situations would she see the opposite?). What’s telling, though, is the way one side pegs her as a misandrist for it and shit on her work and herself for it, and the other side pegs those for being misogynist for taking issue with her (though, in fairness, some are and will hate on anything by a woman discussing problems for women).

        Basically, I feel like this is two groups yelling past each other and being upset about the same issue: gender-based mistreatment. But another key thing is… well, the guys who happen across her comics should recognize that it’s a comic equivalent of TwoXChromosomes from Reddit: it’s by a woman, largely for women, and you should either skip it or read it for a glimpse of a perception you normally don’t experience, not something to argue over. And the women, just like with 2X, should take this stuff with a grain of salt (especially when someone presumes to know what men’s experiences are). Stuff is exaggerated to pinpoint an issue, but you shouldn’t let it poison your view of the world (or men).

        Basically, I feel like there’s value in comics like PizzaCake’s, but the heavy commenting should be expected, not hated on. The most value people can get from it would be hearing other perspectives without insulting them for having a different one than your own. Except the actual misogynists (and misandists), they can fuck off, but I think it’s worth giving the benefit of the doubt to start.

        • admin@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I saw that thread and honestly wanted to comment something like this, but I thought it would be better to let it go unsaid.

          And she refused to even acknowledge that she might suffer from the same blind spot she is accusing others of.

          Edit: the archive link : https://archive.is/xfVPD

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          well, the guys who happen across her comics should recognize that it’s a comic equivalent of TwoXChromosomes from Reddit: it’s by a woman, largely for women, and you should either skip it or read it for a glimpse of a perception you normally don’t experience, not something to argue over.

          So, to cite the devil, as men should not interject in women’s spaces when misandrist tropes are being normalised there, so women should not interject in men’s spaces when men are normalising misogyny.

          I don’t know about you but I don’t think that’s the solution to society’s issues. In fact, we should have a standard of both sides policing their own spaces against harmful tropes.

      • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Being a misogynist overbearing male asshole makes one unfuckable. They are the probably bitter about having that obvious truth pointed out to their dumb asses.

        • S0ck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          For real. Their ideaology is so twisted. They think that in order to attract women, they should be a what a man’s idea of an attractive man is. And instead, being what a woman would find attractive is somehow… gay? Like, I just don’t get it, like there’s a very fundamental misunderstanding of what it is they are trying to do. Very square peg in a round hole situation.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The art is incredibly bland, the points they make are very surface level, and the artist is an awful person.

      So many people think they’re owning the libs or whatever by posting them.

      • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Some people just seem to find low hanging fruit to their tastes.

        No idea why, though if I had to guess, it’s probably because it takes no effort to understand any of it.

        Like how children play with blocks. They’re easy.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      From the comments, it seems the artist herself isn’t well liked.

      From knowing nothing about the artist, but having seen a huge bulk of these comics: Maybe they’re incels. 🤷🏻‍♂️ These do tend to be about toxic masculinity and just bad male behavior in general. It’s like seeing a Republican hating someone because that someone they hate calls out Republican bullshit.

          • gaja@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah, no. A male SA survivor expressed sincere perspective, claiming the original comic insensitive. It was the top comment before it was removed with many other responses. Just read the posts linked in the comment below the one I shared. It’s not incel garbage (mostly), she’s an intolerable Karen. She’s got the mods censoring that sub, it’s one of the reasons I left reddit. (I’ve been banned multiple times for expressing these facts.) They ban people for being critical. I think hating her for being unfunny or having an only fans is dumb. On the other hand, hating on her for being an unapologetic asshole is fine. She’s earned it.

              • gaja@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                They reversed my ban from the comics sub after appealing.

                It’s still extremely problematic that this being painted as incels vs pizza. She has had bad takes on free health care, male survivors, and equating all criticism to misogynistic haters. She doubles down and never argues in good faith.

                I really like BHJ. It’s fun and chill. She just didn’t like that people were being critical of her takes. The mods were actively removing hateful content and responses. They expressed willingness to help remove any offending content.

                Now, you can’t even mention her name on the sub without threat of ban. It’s ridiculous that she’d try DMCA against something so clearly fair use. Weaponizing it like that isn’t even legal. The mods couldn’t be bothered to fight it though.

                I politically agree with her mostly and find some of her comics sincerely funny, but she’s still being a dick.

        • gurnu@lemmy.worldBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Toxic PCC fans strong on Lemmy already? This community is a lost cause

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Seriously – my wife takes 0% of my bullshit, and that’s such a great quality. Just sayin’.

    • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      My wife tolerates a little of my bullshit. But that tolerance may be because she can’t tell if I’m just being weird or not. And she knew I was different when she was dating me and yet she still married me.

    • parody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t know the artist besides what hits the front page here

      Isn’t it kind of fucking awesome that douchebags are getting owned?

    • gurnu@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You forgot her threatening to sue a subreddit for critizing and making fun of her comics. There’s a reason why some people don’t want her comics here, and that’s because she’s toxic as fuck

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yeah, but to be fair, the threads linked here from r/BHJ are Chernobyl-level toxic, and they seem to think they’re the victims.

        • gurnu@lemmy.worldBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Weird how people get so parasocially attached to others, to the point of whiite knighting

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            thou doth protest too much!

            I couldn’t give a flying shit about the artist.

            I just enjoy poking at the incels that clearly feel emboldened to flame the threads every time PCC gets posted.

            I mean, it’s literally every single post. It’s getting old and boring. So, I made the bingo card to spice the turd stew up that y’all make.

            is it not hot enough for you? don’t worry, I’ll make it extra spicy for you next time 😘.

            • gurnu@lemmy.worldBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              What’s old and boring is PCC’s fan army defending her and her mediocre comics (while simping her OF) at every turn, being just as toxic as her.

              Make it spicy how? You gonna sue me like PCC tried to sue a subreddit for critizing her comics?

              • Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                The only people mentioning her OF are guys like you who get riled up when someone does sex work to pay their bills. Please tell me where she so relentlessly advertises her nudes in her comics and where people in this thread “simp” (and I don’t mean defending the fact that she has one) for her OF.

            • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              “Criticism = incel” is a great, quick litmus test for identifying shitty people.

              The irony is that the vast majority of people who use “incel” as an insult also tend to dissonantly believe that value judgments of women based on virginity are immoral, lol.

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve honestly never encountered this artist and don’t know any of the drama around them.

          Can I say her art style sucks just to win the prize for a bingo though?

    • Orangutanion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m happy to be honest, I agree with some of these (obv not the bitch slut or nazi ones). You need another square pointing out how the r/comics mods defend her to a kind of insane level, and definitely give her preferential treatment over other comic artists.

        • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          as you can see I drew myself as the Chad and you as the soyjack, so I win

          Legitimate criticism of someone isn’t incel behaviour bruh

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            you’re right.

            consistent criticism that hits each of those nine points on every single PCC post doesn’t denote incel behavior.

            it’s still pretty pathetic though, that none of these incels have the self control to ignore a post and go into a blind rage when they see a comic. Only to feel the uncontrollable urge to berate an artist that clearly isn’t on this platform. like, who are they trying to convince? sad.

            the bingo card is mostly entertainment for myself just so I can keep laughing at them while these comics keep getting posted.

            I’ll probably make more every time I see PCC get posted.

            • gurnu@lemmy.worldBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              She doesn’t care about you no matter how much you white knight her or wank over her OF. You sound just as toxic and simpleminded as I imagine a PCC fan to be

  • Fulgur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I can see that people don’t always know how to word their critique. But the point is simple: This is a toxic way to deal with that type of annoyance in your life. It’s a comic, indeed, maybe not meant to be taken seriously, but I would much better see comics about interesting, or fun things. This type of ordinary, sarcastic social commentary you present as a comic does not help your cause nor make the sub a better place. Let’s not perpetrate the “owning” culture so prevalent in social media. Shall you?

  • Poxlox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    According to these commenters and bingo cards anyone who criticized this artist is an incel. To me she just makes mid borderline lame/cringe comics. Was happy not seeing her stuff after leaving Reddit lo and behold shes back with comics denoting imaginary scenarios without any punchlines. Go ahead and check a bingo square and call me an incel her work sucks.

  • Alteon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love seeing these comics. You can always count on like 20 white males showing up asking how this is funny, that it’s a strawman, that pizzacake is terrible, blah blah blah.

    The simple thing is, they are comics that give a flavor of the times. Males ARE acting this way. Is it a caricature of a scenario, sure, but that’s what a fucking comic is. Does it have to be “funny” in order to be a comic? No, there are political comics everywhere. Why does pizzacake only get this sort of ire? Is it because she’s calling out white males on the absurdity of their actions, and they don’t like it?

    My advice? Chill TF out bros. It’s a comic. If you don’t like it, maybe you should talk to your buddies when they start acting like Andrew Taint’s mouthpiece. Toxic masculinity is a real issue. Sorry that it takes a fucking pizzacake comic to discuss it…

  • teslasaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yup. This checks all of the “that is definitely how people talk”-boxes. It’s like an invented dialogue meets a fantasy answer.

    Can we not have AIop being upvoted to the top? Thanks.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, the virtue signaling is at an insane level, but the author never seems to take their own advice or take it well when anyone points out their blind spots.

      • tischbier@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, on this topic I feel like she’s in the ballpark. My girlfriend and I game in the same spaces but we don’t always announce that we are together IRL for privacy sake. And we are both very independent people.

        The amount of weird dudes she’s ran into that have used “high value man” or “high value woman” is absolutely more than one. They’re pretty common to bump into in online spaces.

        The last time she ran into a problem with a dude like this—she read me the chat as it was going down. The guy was clearly into her but couldn’t handle that she was taken and had no interest. So, this random dude proceeded to call me a cuck (hahaha), asked if I “knew what she was up to” (gaming? lol), and that no high value man would want her! He did this in a public gaming space too and about 50 people thankfully dog piled and ratioed him into oblivion.

        Oh well! I guess she’s stuck with “her low value cuck man” who makes her coffee in bed every morning and with whom she raised a cute and healthy family with. She’s allowed to do whatever she wants and her male doesn’t even try to control her. How horrible! She’ll never recover!

        These dudes are dangerous in numbers. Which is why they deserve and need to be mocked mercilessly until they fuck off or get therapy.

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Which is why they deserve and need to be mocked mercilessly until they fuck off or get therapy.

          I’m doing my part. 🫡

          Actually, I missed this thread.

      • Aksamit@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The only comic of hers that I’ve found morally objectionable was years ago now, and framed around complaining about her kids.

        It had thousands of downvotes (on reddit) and all the comments were calling her out for being entierly responsible for her situation as a parent, and telling her to suck it up and step up because bitching out her kids like that was damaging them, unproductive and absolutely not funny.

        Out of the thousands of comic panels of hers that I’ve seen, that’s really not a bad track record at all.

      • spectre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I generally agree with her opinions, but there’s more to thinking a comic is good than pointing at it and going “wow i think that too.” They always just seem like super generic “relatable” jokes, and it’s crazy that they always get 50 billion upvotes.

    • Nelots@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lol. Dog shit comments like this being posted on reddit was a good reason to leave that shithole.

      I’m not a fan of her comics, I just don’t find them very funny. But the level of unconstructive hate she gets is absurd. Just move on if you don’t like the comics. If you really dislike them, just block the user or community. It’s not hard. Grow up.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t see what’s dogshit about it. Maybe you just don’t like it?

      Fits the current comic btw.

    • Apeman42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Are you afraid spez is going to come to your house and lick your feet while you sleep if you say Reddit? Nothing more pathetic than self-censorship. Say the fucking word or pick another one.

      • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        So, if someone disagrees with your opinion of PizzaShit, they’re somehow a conservative?

        Jesus fucking Christ. This is truly r/comics Al over again.

          • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Wait, so- in a different discussion where you removed your downvoted comments that were arguing something similar… you were right, but here where the same point could be made, it’s wrong? Let me refresh you, because the you didn’t remove the one that had positive voting:

            If nazzis and I agree 1+1 makes 2 that doesn’t mean we’re all Nazzis.

            So if we change “nazzis” (Nazis) to conservatives….

            Well, I guess we finally see what happens when the pot meets the kettle, don’t we.

      • dota__2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        now now. that’s just a stupid stance to take. you don’t have to make media to be critical of it.

        or do you have to make a podcast to say joe rogan’s slop is toxic, diseased, and damaging to society?

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’re right of course! But also there’s a big difference between real criticism and just saying something is “dogshit”. In fact you criticized Joe Rogan’s stuff properly, by drawing attention to the negative effects it has on people. We could go even further and pick out specific cases. (Though there’s no need to in this case, I agree with you.)

          On the other hand, shitting on something with no reasoning just makes you a hater. I work with several comic artists professionally, and a common thing they ALL see is a nontrivial percentage of commenters who simply disparage everything. This is not because the content is inherently bad, but because all these trolls can do is destroy, not create.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Them saying Joe Rogan’s podcast is “toxic, diseased, and damaging to society” is not better critique than the other poster calling this comic dog shit. Both are just statements that provide no argument or reasoning behind the statements. Sure they could back it up with examples why it is so, but so could the other commenter, which would make either of those comments valid criticism, but without they are equally good (or bad) criticism.

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I think it’s fine because we were operating on an implicit set of shared knowledge. Not every communication needs to be a research paper.

              I have no understanding (implicit or explicit) of why the original commenter hated this comic, and clearly that’s the case for the vast majority of the voters here.

              • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Providing 2-3 lines of explanatory context is hardly a research paper, but enough to illustrate reason behind a simple statement.

                AFAIK, the author of this comic is somewhat of an asshat that exercises varying degree of censorship on a comic strip subreddit, based on their personal beliefs.

                • dota__2@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  like i replied to the original comment that person is complaining about, she’s had some really dumb takes but is usually in the right ballpark. those dumb takes were also cases where she doubled down and yeah, that subreddit is basically a safespace for their superusers/content creators.

          • dota__2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            there is no substantive difference between my comment about rogan and that guys comment about this comic. only your opinion is coloring how you take it.

            you and every single person upvoting you are just lemmings wearing a different team’s jersey than the idiot lemming above.

            if anything, we need more haters at this point, because y’all dumb af.

        • Kichae@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          “This is a dog shit comic” is not a critique, though, is the thing. It’s just jerking off in public.

          • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            A woman being involved in anything NSFW is automatically labelled negatively among a certain sect of the population.

            Which is such a shame because drawing a funny comic that has NSFW elements should be lauded.

            Love oglaf.com

          • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I don’t think simping for online personalities and influencers is particularly healthy, and it’s one of the last things I’d defend.

            It ain’t about the porn, more the intent to sell porn behind the guise of a reddit comic.

            Kinda like when SrGrafo was making loli art. (don’t make me post it)

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              It ain’t about the porn, more the intent to sell porn behind the guise of a reddit comic.

              That’s strange, because I’m only aware of the porn because of you, not because of the comic.

              You’re the one advertising Internet porn here.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I find that highly unlikely. It’s far more profitable to just do NSFW if that’s your goal.

          If anything the NSFW posts are a way to monetize the actual thing she wants to draw, which are normal comics.

          • PlantJam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Exactly. The NSFW stuff came about from demand, not because she was pushing it. It ended up being very successful, so she kept doing it. It’s weird how angry people get that someone would post nudes.

  • admin@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    At first, I thought people were exaggerating by calling her comics a strawman, as the situation mentioned in the comic above happens too commonly.

    I did a little digging and found this deleted thread.

    https://archive.is/xfVPD

    To my surprise she turned out exactly like people she seems to be calling out.