• bishbosh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ernie no!!

    The wealthy aren’t a protected class, it’s not a hate crime.

  • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Just out of curiosity, what do yall expect to happen when the only response to an ad supported free tier of something, is to block the ads? I know YouTube/google aren’t great companies, but when you run an ad blocker you also deprive the creators you love watching any revenue from your view. So you hurt the creators. If you can afford it, just sub to premium and stop acting like you’re entitled to everything for free. I despise ads just as much if not more than the next dipshit, but complaining about them, when there’s myriad ways of avoiding them, just makes you sound like a dingus.

    Obligatory shout out to Nebula as a cheaper alternative for non-fiction/edutainment content.

    • lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Most creators have patreons. The big ones take sponsorships also. The pittance they get from any ads I may have watched do not matter.

      • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        So the alternative is to manage a subscription for every single creator I watch? Currently I sub to Nebula and YT premium. For ~$20 a month. If I were to go through and sub to every creator I watch’s lowest patreon tier, we’d be talking about dozens of individual subs totaling probably more than double what I pay now.

        I’m not arguing against ad blockers but seriously, what do you think is going to happen if everyone uses an ad blocker and doesn’t pay for a service? You get Google pushing Manifest V3 as fast as they can. You get the huge arms race with the biggest tech firms doing everything they can to eliminate any and all kinds of ad blocking.

        It’s not about the amount of money you individually generate for a creator. It’s about the net effect of everyone running adblockers.

        I get the vast majority of people don’t use ad blockers. But just wow does it feel like people dont spend more than three seconds thinking about anything.

    • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Or alternatively, run and adblocker and literally give the creators you watch 1$ per month and you’re still supporting them 100 times more than turning on ads would, and you still get to keep some semblance of privacy.

      • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        So your suggestion is to manage 15 subscriptions instead of one? Not every creator has a patreon or means of direct support. Not to mention some of these creators only upload once a year. And what happens when I want to watch someone new? Do I have to drop another creator to give this new person money

        If you’re watching youtube and signed into an account you said goodbye to that level of privacy so long ago that an ad blocker isn’t going to do much.

        • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Buying premium would absolutely do more than turning on ads, but it still would be nowhere near the efficacy of direct support. Most creators have methods of direct support, and those that don’t can easily be petitioned to start. For a creator that uploads once a year, perhaps you donate once per upload. Also, I don’t think it has anything to do with managing subscriptions and everything to do with dropping a little bit of money when you notice you’ve been enjoying something.

          I don’t know why people are downvoting you tho.

  • ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    My favorite experience in this regard was watching YouTube on xbox (i know, i know)… They played a 40 minute redbull “ad” on a five minute video. In what sane world should ads be 8 fucking times longer than the content?!?!1?

    • domdanial@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I had a similar experience on my YouTube TV app, I was watching old history channels in bed, and there was a full length documentary for an “ad”. I could have skipped after 15 seconds or whatever, but I had to INTERACT with the TV before it would resume. I was distracted so it ended up playing like 15 minutes of an hour+ documentary ad.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sure they do, I’ve revoked my consent by installing an adblocker I haven’t watched a video ad in probably 8 years.

      • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        And you have the agency and ability to either pay for the service or investigate other means of avoiding them. Complaining about them is just annoying.

        • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          this is my argument. there isn’t a huge monetary entrance fee, just some time to set things up. the solution is there with minimal effort, your right to complain has left the building, do something about it or gtfo.

    • Nelots@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I wish using freetube kept Ernie calm, but it just doesn’t work half the time. Invidious has the same issue. Which is significantly more annoying than just using YT, which Ernie has uBlock Origin for.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    So far, every comment bar one has mentioned ad blockers.

    You lot are as original and creative as the numpties making comments about the size of the pilot’s balls on aviation videos.

    • tomi000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This is a post about unnecessary rage that absolutely noone has to deal with because everyone should use ad blockers. OP may or may not know, but the post suggests the later. I dont see how it is ‘unoriginal’ to comment about ad blockersin that case…

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        So far, every comment bar one has mentioned ad blockers.

        The fact that almost everyone is saying the same thing is pretty much the definition of unoriginal.

        • tomi000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          It just shows what the focus lies on. A post full of comments recommending adblockers has far more impact than a single comment making the post seem dead.

          Youre technically right that it is unoriginal, but I dont see how originality would matter at all in this case.

      • BreadOven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        So it just removes the part in the video that they talk about the sponsor? I’ve never heard of such witchcraft.

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s a community driven auto skipper. Any video that is not brand new will probably be tagged by someone and you can just enjoy it. If you use it in an actual browser you can also tag sections. It’s great.