• don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Or the 50% of all people that got snapped took 50% of the gut bacteria with them, leaving the rest with no loss to their gut biomes. (taps forehead)

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Killing 50% of your gut bacteria is a big nothing.

    These things reproduce on the timescale of hours.

    I kill 90% of my sourdough starter every time I feed it, and it bounces back the same day.

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, I have been on antibiotics that wiped out most of my gut bacteria. It was easy to upset my stomach for a few months, then I was fine.

      • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I had the same experience with norovirus this spring.

        Probiotics did the trick, but it was t so much fun.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That would imply that 50 percent of the snapped people’s biomes remained behind. All of the produce in the grocery stores would be covered in an airborne mist of E. coli, and snapped surgeons that were mid-operation would give their patients staph infections, assuming the suriviving surgery team was able to stablize and close them up before they died anyway. Neat.

    Also when those snapped people returned with the half of their biomes that also got snapped, you would get a sequel to the diarrhea. Diarrhea 2: Electric Boogapoo.

        • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Eh, it’s not really that cut and dry. You could debate either way with plenty of evidence, in the end it’s really a limit to the semantics of language

          Edit: here’s a neat article that talks about it

          • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Thats pretty neat “you cant kill something thats not alive”. Can viruses respond to stimuli? We consider bacteria alive but viruses are debated, wheres the line? are enzymes alive? Are prions alive? cool article.

      • Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do viruses get snapped too or na

        And da babies in-utero? Did the Infinity Gauntlet go by conception or 24-weeks?

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          And da babies in-utero? Did the Infinity Gauntlet go by conception or 24-weeks?

          Now you got this idea in my head, if it would have been possible to know if the Infinity Gauntlet considered conception, couldn’t a species, lets say humans, knowing “the snap” was a possible risk, create massive stores of zygotes kept on ice? Lets say 10 zygotes to every 1 living human. After the snap of “half” that would mean that instead of 50% of humans disappearing it would only have been 2.5%.

          Moreover, since every other species would have lost 50% and been in chaos it would have been prime opportunity to conquer other species still in disarray.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Now I’d love to see a story about a species that has huge numbers of young but also incredibly high infant mortality. So in the snap they mostly lost a bunch of kids who were going to die anyway. Then they decide to take advantage and invade their neighbors, and Captain Marvel comes to help.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          There were zero reports I’ve heard from any TV, movie, or comic reference to the snap of unborn (but possibly viable) babies being left behind (by any species even) when the pregnant mother disappeared in the snap. That suggests the Infinity Gauntlet doesn’t consider the unborn as a separate individual until birth.

          • Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            unborn (but possibly viable) babies being left behind (by any species even) when the pregnant mother disappeared in the snap.

            This scenario didn’t even enter my head when I posed the question. That’s some Stephen King-level imagery though—a snapped mother disappearing only for an amniotic sac to drop in her place.

            • Match!!@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              imagine the stone suddenly surgically removing your conjoined twin but leaving you with a typical body afterwards. then 5 years later your twin - now noticably younger and alien to you - is reattached

            • samus12345@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I think the Gauntlet counted any beings that either depended on another to live or supported another to live as all one unit for simplicity’s sake.

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I would love a comic series where each Infinity Stone has a representative entity of some kind and we get to see the “thought process” each goes through in fulfilling the request of its wielder. I’m envisioning a format like the Pixar movie “Inside Out” except each stone’s entity is very judgy on how the wielder is using it.

                “Ugh, Goddamit Dr Strange, how many more times do you want to do this Dormamu thing. Its getting really repetitive.” - Time stone

                Or when multiple stones have to work together, they have to hash out what each is going to do to fulfill the desired wish. The conversation between all the stones during “the snap” being the longest and most complicated conversation with questions coming up like “okay Mr Soul Stone smart guy, what about pregnant women?! Is that one soul or two, huh?”

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Finally someone asks the real question. Is there an objective definition to life that Virus may or may not fall under? Or would it depend on Thano’s subjective opinion on the matter?

        • BenReilly97@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The scientific definition of life changes constantly, but viruses more often than not fall under “not alive.”

          Throughout, viruses have rarely been considered alive. More than 120 definitions of life exist today, and most require metabolism, a set of chemical reactions that produce energy. Viruses do not metabolize. They also don’t fit some other common criteria. They do not have cells. They cannot reproduce independently. Viruses are inert packages of DNA or RNA that cannot replicate without a host cell.

          Source

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Come to think about it, whenever a macroscopic organism - ie animals - died it would leave behind about half the microbes living on and in them. When those poor fools got dusted it should have left a puddle of horrible slime on the ground.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Does that mean for the people that got snapped, some will leave some of their sperm behind?

    And pregnant woman might leave their fetus behind.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        There was never any such ideas being part of it. It affected plantlife and bacteria as well. The idea of a soul to begin with is not even supported by science, although most people consider it to have some kind of validity, even if it’s not quite definable. But the relevant issue is that it’s all life period.

        • piecat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Macroscopic creatures are made of different types of cells and stuff… what constitutes a living thing?

          People didn’t lose half of their cells, it was all or none.

  • CoolMatt@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As someome who is fucking stupid, what ghe hell is a gut biome and why would 50% of the world population disappearing affect it at all? And why would people be power blasting their bathrooms with diarrhea

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Your gut is full of friendly bacteria that help you digest your food and keep everything running smoothly and efficiency. This vast community of bacteria is called a gut microbiome. People with gut problems like inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome tend to have a much less diverse gut micribiome. Taking a broad spectrum antibiotic can devastate your gut microbiome, letting the bad bacteria thrive while the good ones are offstage, sometimes leading to some of the same symptoms that people with IBD and IBS might encounter, and it can take months to recover.

      Killing 50% of all living things might include 50% of gut microbia, resulting in the potential for bloating, gassiness, stomach cramps, and potentially diarrhoea.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was kidding around, it’s a silly leap, and the post is silly, so I was just suggesting something silly myself. Someone else seems to have done the legwork though.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Not just the bathrooms, but the livingrooms and childrenrooms too.

    !(I would have used “kitchenrooms” but I couldn’t bring myself to make that kind of joke)!<

    • lousyd@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seems like if you killed half of a bacteria that would kill the whole thing, wouldn’t it? You can’t just chop a bacteria in half. I don’t think…

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It depends on the bacteria, when in it’s lifecycle half of it is killed, and what half is killed. To keep things short, the odds are in the bacteria’s favor. Suppose if half the bacteria in your gut died right now how long do you think it would take for the bacteria population in your gut to return to pre-snap levels? A month? A year? Decades? How about less than an hour. Bacteria reproduce exponentially and on average, a bacterial generation lasts 20 minutes. Meaning that every 20 minutes the population doubles, assuming there are no deaths in the population during this time. If there is space for bacteria to grow, they will.

    • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have a math problem for you.

      10x0,5 + 20x0,5 + 40x0,5 = 5+10+20= 35

      (10+20+40)x0,5 = 70x0,5 = 35

      You see where this is going?

  • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Thanos’ snap wouldn’t kill 50% of each survivors’ gut microbiome, it would kill 50% of all the lil buggies that compromise all gut microbiomes, and if the snap effects individuals randomly, you’d see a normal distribution (I think, I haven’t taken stats in a decade). So some survivors would retain 100% of their microbiome, some would lose it all, with a bell curve in between, probably with the peak around 50%.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That bell curve would be extremely narrow. You have so many lil buggies that basically every human survivor would lose ~50% buggies.

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I want the show where the snapped people come back and then the survivors have to awkwardly explain that they have gotten remarried and otherwise moved on.

  • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think the intention was sentient life as having Thanos stop the film to explain the terms and conditions of his snap would’ve impacted the pacing of the film.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      He coulda just slipped the word “sentient” in to the monologue where he explains his plan. I don’t think that would have impacted pacing at all.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Since we’re talking about magic, maybe life that’s inside or attached to other life not disappeared by the snap gets a pass.