Personally, I don’t* but I was curious what others think.

*some sandwiches excluded like a Cubano or chicken parm; those do require cooking.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Cooking is simply the preparing of food.

    It doesn’t necessarily require the application of heat.

    If some one is being proud of a sandwich- let them be proud. We all start somewhere.

    • RandomStickman@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Cooking, also known as cookery or professionally as the culinary arts, is the art, science and craft of using heat to make food more palatable, digestible, nutritious, or safe.

      Wikipedia says so. Can someone make a really good sandwich without cooking? Sure. I wouldn’t even pull an “um ackshuly” on them. But you’re putting words in OP’s mouth now.

  • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Cooking (in the English I was taught) involves the application of heat - frying, baking, roasting, boiling etc are the names for specific ways to do this. A sandwich would be made or prepared.

      • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Just for the heck of it, if you heat protein enough to denature it but have no Maillard reaction (let’s say you’ve just made a hard boiled egg), would that not be considered cooking by that definition?

        My understanding is that denaturing is a physical structure change, not a chemical one (and according to Wikipedia can be reversible in some cases), not a biochemist or food scientist though so totally accepting that my understanding is incorrect/incomplete.

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The specific language you speak has significant impact here. For some, "to make food* is used to refer to cooking. Where as in English it’s not so clear. I prefer the use in terms of survival. IMO, if you can make any food enough to survive you can cook, because in English there is not a better colloquial verb. Though i wouldn’t call you ‘a cook’ or ‘a chef’ if you can’t apply heat to produce edible food from raw.

    • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This might be different depending on the speaker, but at least for me Portuguese and Italian are even stricter on interpreting cozinhar/cozer and cucinare/cuocere as involving heat. Like, if I were to say for example ⟨*cozinhei um sanduíche⟩ (literally “I *cooked a sandwich”), I’m almost sure that people would interpret it as “I picked an already prepared sandwich and used it as ingredient for something else”

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean that’s true of the english term as well. But if someone says they can’t cook i default to thinking they order out every meal or use a microwave fot cup of ramen. Making sandwiches, salads, and other cold foods is still a skill but there’s no word such as cold-cutlerist and i refuse andwich artist.

        • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Perhaps I’m overthinking it, but the English verb seems to have different meanings when it’s used transitive and intransitively. For example, let’s say that you ask someone to prepare you a salad, and the person answers:

          • “I can’t cook.” (sounds OK?)
          • “I can’t cook a salad.” (sounds weird)
          • untorquer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I think that’s grammatically true but i tend to think of it more in terms of colloquialisms or slang. I imagine intransitive use of the verb developed out of convenience for lack of a lazy alternative. “I can’t prepare food” would either suggest you require assistance to eat, you can’t legally work at a restaurant, or your aristocratic status is beyond that of a mere peasant who has seen a kitchen before.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      True, but, turn that into ‘I’m cooking up a sandwich’, and now the phrase potentially expands its domain to basically mean any kind of food preparation.

      The addition if ‘up’ makes it less literal, more jovial and less bounded.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        True, but, turn that into ‘I’m cooking up a sandwich’, and now the phrase potentially expands its domain to basically mean any kind of food preparation.

        The phrase expands into any preparation or invention, even ones that clearly do not have anything to do with cooking. e.g. “I’m cooking up a plan to deal with this.”

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Cooking” to me, requires the combination of ingredients AND heating them to create a new thing. Making a grilled cheese is basic, but cooking. Slapping meat, cheese and veg on bread is not cooking.

  • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t think it’s cooking unless you are applying heat to cause a chemical reaction. So, making a grilled cheese sandwich counts as cooking, but a BP&J does not.

  • Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The question is inadequatly phrased. You must describe what kind of sandwich we are speaking of. Unless op is speaking about cold sandwiches exclusively, many sandwiches require cooking.

    Croque Monsieur

    Grilled Cheese

    Cubano

    Monte Cristo

    Panini

    These are just a few that I came up with off the top of my head. I’m sure there are many more.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nope. In English, if it doesn’t involve the application of heat, you ain’t cooking, you’re preparing, making, or other terminology.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Pretty much, yeah. Same as grilling a burger and putting it on bread is cooking despite the bread being pre-made.

        Afaik, cooking isn’t limited to applying heat to raw foods.

        Might be worth saying that I don’t remember which dictionary the definition came from, and that dictionaries only record language, they don’t prevent changes over time. Which means that usage could have changed enough since the last time I looked at any, and now have a different usage added

  • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The word cooking, to me, means using heat with a stove. Baking is for the oven. Grilling, is outside on a grill. But a sandwich is only ever “made” in my house. “Will you make me a sandwich?”, “I’m making a sandwich”

    Good question though. Never thought about it.

    • nous@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I see cooking as a more general term. Both baking and grilling are forms of cooking. You can also roast and grill things in the oven. Cooking on a stove also has different specific terms, boiling, simmering, frying etc.

        • nous@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I mean more general than heat with a stove. Not as is every form of meal preparation.

          But yes. I would cook a salad - stir frys are basically just cooked salads with some rice or noodles. I would not consider every salad to be cooked though.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I guess it would depend on the type of sandwich

    . Peanut butter and jelly? No

    A simple cheese sandwich? No

    Grilled cheese sandwich? Yes

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        peanut butter and jelly and pickles sandwich

        this sounds like something my SiL would eat when she was pregnant.

        also… what kind of pickles? I bet i could get my nephew and nieces to eat it, and they’d probably love it.

  • StopJoiningWars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Does it take unreasonably long compared to the time to consume the food?

    Yes.

    Does it use ingredients?

    Yes.

    Is it worth the effort?

    No.

    Sounds like cooking to me.

        • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They did not say “do I enjoy it?” they said “Is it worth the effort?” and if having food made exactly to your taste is not worth the effort you either have no standards and would be fine with microwave slop and fast food, or you lack the skill to make something that satisfies you.

          Either way, skill issue.

          The one exception would be if you’re disabled or something, and I don’t mean “I have adhd” disabled, I mean “I physically can’t stand at the stove for 20-30 minites” disabled.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Entirely context dependent.

    Who’s cooking tonight? Me, and if it’s sandwiches, salad, etc - still counts.

    No cooking in the room. Combining sliced bread with sliced cheese out of the bag - doesn’t count.