Some of the LinkedIn Responses are direct and on-point, and also hilariously/depressingly based depending on how you look at it:

EDIT: In hindsight, I think I should’ve looked into posting this in a different community… It’s closer to a silly “innovation”… soo… is this considered FUD? I also don’t support smoking or vaping, especially among kids. Original title had “privacy-violating” before the “solution”.

  • pe1uca@lemmy.pe1uca.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Well, seems they already had the vaping sensors implemented and they’re just announcing the notifications implementation… How hard is to just build am android app that displays a list and a popup?

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    we hope this will reduce vaping through social pressure

    The social pressure of all of your friends knowing that you’re cool and break the rules?

  • brokenlcd@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    In my high school they managed to rip the alarm’s siren off the wall without triggering it; if these kids have even an 1/8 th of the ingenuity they had, these things aren’t gonna last

    • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Do kids prefer to not have doors then? Because I’m reading a lot of messed up headlines where the school removes the stall and bathroom doors and kids lose their privacy.

      I’d rather have the TV with an alert than have to do competitive pooping.

        • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          It’s a separate but adjacent problem.

          No school should ever be allowed to take the doors off bathroom stalls.

          That just seems to be the alternative that don’t places are doing to deal with kids congregating in the bathroom to vape.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      A very long time ago, and much less technologically advanced:

      I went to boarding school. We had a little bit of a propensity for sneaking out of the dorm at night.

      New dean comes in our senior year and installs alarms on all the exits.

      Our senior year time capsule contains the controlling keypad to that alarm system that wasn’t even functional for twenty four hours.

      I’ve no doubt that today’s teens possess the ingenuity to bypass if not completely disable this thing.

        • Chuymatt@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          It has to have the vape fumes get to the sensor. Cover the sensor with the bag, tie off with rubber band. No more ability to sense what can’t get there.

          I, in no way, am endorsing vaping, especially with kids.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      That seems like a management issue.

      They can see the time it went offline and then the time you walked out of the bathroom. It doesn’t take much to put it together.

      Also I think these devices are designed to be resistant to tampering.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        A piece of clear packing tape would take it out permanently as it would be almost impossible to see that the sensor was covered if the tape was applied cleanly.

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          You’ve seen packing tape in real life, right? It’s not “almost impossible to see”, it’s shiny and obvious. As much as I love skirting draconian measures, that ain’t it…

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            Nobody is going to inspect it that closely, especially if they mount it on the ceiling. It does blend into certain plastics that are smooth.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Its amazing the number of problems in life that csn be solved with a $2 harbor freight automatic punch. Speakers especially.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    One of the dumber positions I’ve seen in a while: that it’s someone’s right to break the rules and put others’ safety at risk with fucking vaping, and disallowing that is against anyone’s privacy.

  • Cornflake@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    At least in the United States, most schools are not a place of privacy as the schools have a certain right to authority over their pupils. Consider Tinker v. Des Moines and what it meant for freedom of speech in schools. That case won students the right to freedom of expression. It’s important, but in certain cases it becomes limited by Morse v. Frederick, a case that ultimately meant that such expression must not disrupt the learning environment. All of this is to say that students have certain freedoms until expressing those freedoms is disruptive to the learning experience, and I don’t think there’s any solid argument that would not consider vaping disruptive to the learning environment. Considering this as an invasion of privacy is a moot point when you consider that students don’t really have the same rights as adults, especially in public school situations.

  • verdigris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Good God I hate linkedin types. Imagine thinking writing an app that literally just displays a single notification is worthy of making a whole post about. They basically wrote a Hello World app for Android TV. And I’m sure they got paid like 40k by some poor school district to do so.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      I physically cannot read LinkedIn for more than 5 minutes at a time. I get seriously nauseated 🤢🤢🤢 from all the corporate talk

          • toastal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            Only luck I had that route was getting a free coffee & b1tcted about the industry. Networking is better than recruiters 95% of the time anyhow. Microsoft doesn’t deserve your data or attention.

            • expr@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              I’m a senior software engineer with a pretty uncommon skill set. Recruiters are the primary way that companies hire in my industry outside of networking contacts and I get contacted frequently. The job before my current one was through a recruiter.

              I very much dislike Microsoft and LinkedIn in general, but not using it all is a huge handicap that isn’t worth taking on.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      … Do you think reading a sensor and then accurately determining when the sensor data meets a threshold is the same as displaying static text? Kind of an exaggeration

      • MrRedstoner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        In all likelihood calling manufacturer’s API to read the value then compare to a compile-time constant? It’s a notification hello-world merged with display-a-list hello world and manufacturer’s reading-sensor-values hello world. Yes I do think it’s borderline trivial

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Yeah what I think is weird is that you make a bunch of assumptions about how the app is built. Experienced developers imo know that things are unexpectedly difficult all the time. Even when they are supposed to be as simple as you’re assuming here.

              • MrRedstoner@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                Absolutely I am making a bunch of assumptions. Following the tried and true Keep It Simple Stupid approach. Because there is no indication given that any more complexity is required, and keeping complexity to a minimum is key to efficient development. If there was anything actually technically impressive (or at least technically impressive sounding) about what they did, I trust they would have mentioned it.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  I’m pretty sure this guy was just a project manager or similar. So yeah I am not surprised they’re not mentioning technical hurdles.

      • verdigris@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        That’s not what the post is about, it’s entirely about the android TV app. I assume they already built the functionally to generate the alarm signal (since it’s the entire raison d’etre for the company based on the name).

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Vape “detectors” are the latest off-the-shelf scam product sold to well-meaning but technically clueless school administrators. They don’t work at all but they have a solid sales pitch. This tv app isn’t doing anything but forwarding a notification provided by the manufacturer of the “detection “ device.

  • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Look honestly I don’t think this is that dystopian.

    Smoke detectors existed in bathrooms forever. The main use in high school seems to be catching particularly dumb teenagers smoking cigarettes in the bathroom. When I was in high school they were tuned to be super sensitive to the point where water vapor could set one off. I remember one time where the entire school had to stand out in the rain after a fire alarm went off, in what was later determined to be just two teenagers smoking in the bathroom.

    Teachers also have been trying to catch students smoking for like 50 years. Back in the 20th, there were assistant principals that basically roamed the halls looking for whiffs of cigarette smoke. Part of the reason memes about hanging out under the bleachers started is because it was the best place to smoke on account of being outside, out of the way, and old school gym teachers just not giving a fuck.

    This dudes app just seems like a modern update on very old concepts. Instead of teenagers smoking cigarettes, they are vaping. Instead of a smoke detector, you have something designed specifically for vapes. Instead of some super anal assistant principal on patrol, you have some super anal assistant principal sprinting across the school. Who knows, maybe this is the thing that forces teenagers to touch grass because I’m willing to there aren’t vape detectors under the bleachers and gym teachers still don’t give a fuck.

  • krolden@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I dont remember them trying this hard to get me to stop smoking cigarettes in the bathroom.