axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 13 days agoSatire is indistinguishable from stupiditylemmy.cafeimagemessage-square240linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageSatire is indistinguishable from stupiditylemmy.cafeaxEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 13 days agomessage-square240linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-212 days agosounds overcomplicated, why not just rebrand the so called “land contract” into renting? edit: wouldn’t land contracts required idiotic amounts of identification as opposed to renting which requires none?
minus-squareRivalarrival@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·12 days agoBecause landlords dont want land contracts. They make more on rent. All we have to do is set up an owner-occupant exemption to a massive property tax hike. Landlords won’t be eligible for that exemption. Landlords will use land contracts to get around that hike. They’ll be pushing for tenants to become owners in order to avoid the tax man.
sounds overcomplicated, why not just rebrand the so called “land contract” into renting?
edit: wouldn’t land contracts required idiotic amounts of identification as opposed to renting which requires none?
Because landlords dont want land contracts. They make more on rent.
All we have to do is set up an owner-occupant exemption to a massive property tax hike. Landlords won’t be eligible for that exemption.
Landlords will use land contracts to get around that hike. They’ll be pushing for tenants to become owners in order to avoid the tax man.