• jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    sounds overcomplicated, why not just rebrand the so called “land contract” into renting?

    edit: wouldn’t land contracts required idiotic amounts of identification as opposed to renting which requires none?

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Because landlords dont want land contracts. They make more on rent.

      All we have to do is set up an owner-occupant exemption to a massive property tax hike. Landlords won’t be eligible for that exemption.

      Landlords will use land contracts to get around that hike. They’ll be pushing for tenants to become owners in order to avoid the tax man.