Gsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoJustice Department considering push for historic break up of Google after landmark antitrust ruling: reportnypost.comexternal-linkmessage-square233fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkJustice Department considering push for historic break up of Google after landmark antitrust ruling: reportnypost.comGsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square233fedilink
minus-squareMigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoWhat about Microsoft and Facebook?
minus-squareandroogee (they/she)@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoHow do the people who make this comment every single time something like this happens, expect change when no one’s allowed to be first?
minus-squareAJ1@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoMicrosoft already lost an anti-trust suit in 2001. It’s in the article if you care to read it.
minus-squareSpaceinv8er@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoNo one reads the articles man. I won’t lie, I’m guilty of it, but it’s mainly cuz Im lazy and go to the comments hoping someone will give a synopsis.
minus-squaretrafficnab@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoWe already had first Microsoft anti-trust suit, but what about second Microsoft anti-trust suit?
minus-squareSnapz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months ago“They said smugly without an ounce of depth in their argument.”
What about Microsoft and Facebook?
How do the people who make this comment every single time something like this happens, expect change when no one’s allowed to be first?
Microsoft already lost an anti-trust suit in 2001. It’s in the article if you care to read it.
No one reads the articles man. I won’t lie, I’m guilty of it, but it’s mainly cuz Im lazy and go to the comments hoping someone will give a synopsis.
Thanks
We already had first Microsoft anti-trust suit, but what about second Microsoft anti-trust suit?
“They said smugly without an ounce of depth in their argument.”