• Antithetical@lemmy.deedium.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    It’s a sad state of affairs. I would pay for youtube in a heartbeat if it wasn’t connected to the biggest spyware company in the world. But now, even while paying you still get ads and they still track you. The people working at Alphabet are bad and should feel bad.

  • no banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I feel like youtube is losing sight of why users are paying for the service then.

    To me, personally, youtube is useful enough that I will keep paying to remove ads entirely (in combination with ublock). That being said, there will come a time when the value proposition is no longer balanced. Then I will stop paying, and probably stop using it as well.

    But as always with Google, I question whether their motive is to kill another service. They’re very competent at that specific thing.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      They just want users who are paying full freight as they know the ad business is in step decline.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Is it in decline? I mean, I want to believe it, but I haven’t seen any hard data on that.

        • seralth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          It very much is and is talked about basically nonstop everytime the topic comes up from any content creator that’s been in the game for longer then a decade.

          The ad based system the internet is built on is unraveling.

          • taladar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            The internet isn’t built on it. The commercial websites who do not have other products (as in all the websites related to RL goods, stores,…) are.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              Exactly. If every ad-dependent website went offline tomorrow and all we were left with was Wikipedia, PeerTube, government/academia sites and a bunch of Geocities-esque “labor of love” hobbyist pages, nothing of value would be lost.

              • taladar@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                19 days ago

                True, but my point was that even a lot of the commercial websites that do have other products do not depend on ads, e.g. Amazon and all the other stores would still be there, every company offering a paid service would still be there, every company providing a service related to their RL goods (e.g. specs, drivers, product descriptions, lists of stores where you can buy them,…) would still be there.

                Advertising does not finance a very large percentage of the useful parts of the internet. And among those advertising financed websites that are useful a lot are essentially duplicates to get a chunk of the ad revenue without doing a lot of work (e.g. almost all news websites that just republish AP, Reuters,… content).

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    YT is only usable with ad blockers nowadays. And then it does not make a difference if you have a subscription or not.

    I would subscribe YT if they had a reasonably priced ad free tier, but if it does not make a difference, I’ll watch it for free.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      That way of thinking is a trap. They did have a more reasonably priced ad free tier but people using it only made it worse over time because it got so popular that Youtube could confidently raise prices and slash benefits. And the line has to go up. That‘s the only thing that matters to them.

      • mbirth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Can you, though? Because I remember when DVB started in Europe, they’ve sent a signal during commercials that makes your device block the fast forward feature.

        I don’t know whether that’s still a thing. But you needed a hacked firmware on your TV / set top box to allow to FFWD through commercials back then.

        • fakeplastic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          I’ve never heard of that being the case in America, but I can’t speak to how it works in Europe. That would be lame if it worked that way.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Youtube is telling me daily that they’ll soon disable my youtube because I have an ad blocker. Still waiting for it to actually happen.

    • sykaster@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I’ve been using Ublock origin for years and I’ve never seen a message like that

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        I’ve been using Ublock origin for years

        Same here. I started seeing them this week.

      • nichtsowichtig@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        correct me if I’m wrong, but I think ublock origin updates quickly enough to remove these notifications before most users see them

        • AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          It often does, yeah. Not always though. I got one of the adblock warnings last night, and it refused to play the video. I fixed it by heading into ublock settings and manually updating. It always makes me laugh how rapidly the ad-blocker arms war progresses

    • mbirth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Same here. And I’m waiting for them to finally do it because it’ll free up so much of my time. I might start reading books again.

      Also, it’s the last Google-service I’m using. So, banning me from it will allow me to finally delete my Google account.

    • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      For your web browser, don’t use Chrome. Use Firefox with uBlock, NoScript, Sponsorblock, and a VPN like Mullvad.

      For Smart TV usage, block your TV’s built in “smart functionality” and its access to the internet via MAC address blacklist on your router. Also use SmartTubeNext on a Shield Pro with FLauncher instead of Google’s.

      For mobile, use 3rd party YouTube clients on your device like Vanced on Android, and Unwatched on iOS.

  • Surenho@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I’d love to see a transition to other platforms like Nebula. As users it would be nice to start choosing by principles too.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    It feels insane to me that you’re paying and you still get ads. I fucking refuse to do that