• GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I swear this is getting stupid. One day someone is going to shove a battery pack up the butt with USB port sticking out “omg tech dude, I can charge with my butt”

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s pretty bold of you to to assume that this hasn’t been done already; I’m sure there are more than a few with a flared base for safety.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You should probably ensure you have patent rights on that before you go spouting off about it in public spaces.

  • GooberEar@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    When I was last shopping for furniture, one of the immediate disqualifications was anything that required a power cord. I don’t need or want anything motorized, built-in chargers, bluetooth speakers, and I especially don’t want LED lighting in my chairs. All that crap is designed to fail / break. Not to mention that standards change quicker than furniture gets updated in my household. Most of those USB ports were old 5V USB-A crap that can’t keep up or crappy old bluetooth standards & antennas with poor quality speakers that I would never use anyway because my receiver is far, far better. And fuck LED lights in everything. Fuck that to Hell along with the people that make/invent that bullshit.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Imaging explaining that to someone in 2025 would work too. Didn’t know that either of these existed.

  • .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Even in the early 00s it was already hard to grasp for some folks. I had friends who called me a liar for claiming that I could charge my mp3 music player by slotting it in the USB port of my tower as opposed to swapping out AAA batteries

      • .Donuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m not sure about the timeline on portable mp3 player development and popularity, but this was 2002 or 2003 and I was the only one in my friend group who had one with a li-ion battery as opposed to AAA-batteries.

        “USB doesn’t deliver power, it’s for file transfer!” I was told. Some of my friends were also really stupid, though. That could have contributed to this wonder of technology.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The folks in this thread are misinterpreting the comment. It’s not that someone from 1970 wouldn’t understand the concept; it’s that they would rightfully think that it’s stupid and judge you for putting up with it.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Can confirm, have boomer parents who wonder wtf is wrong with everyone just freely giving up all their personal data to the people they spent 15 years being drilled not to give their information to.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        On the other hand;

        “I don’t care because I have nothing to hide.” - My mother, born 1961, when told she should stop using Chrome.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Neither do I. But why give up something I don’t have to? If it’s valuable to someone else, I should at least get some compensation for it.

      • restingOface@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Did anyone ever actually eat this sort of thing, or was it just the recipe book equivalent of a fashion show? Or perhaps it’s just regional. I sure as hell never ate that in the 70s.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Apparently my grandparents did in the 70s and thought themselves very futuristic for it. That being said my grandma is well known is the worst cook in the family and my grandpa was known for mixing all is food together “because it’s all going to the same place anyway”…

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I feel like you’re grandfather would use one of those meal replacements that were developed for special forces but were abandoned for everyone but U2 pilots or something because they had the texture of wet sawdust.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        That was just hold over food from the 50s. They were obsessed with gelatin back then, and plenty of them were still traumatizing us at family gatherings through the 80s.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Batteries got good enough and electronics efficient enough that for a doorbell it makes more sense to use a battery than to run a dedicated 12v wire.

    My dumb doorbell has a little coin battery.

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    A couch that has an outlet integrated into it ain’t as mind-blowing as you seem to think. In particular considering it is a low power outlet.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Also they had the ability to do this back then, too. It’s just that there weren’t as many devices that needed constant recharging.

      • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Rechargeable batteries weren’t really a thing in the 70’s. For consumer electrical devices, batteries were one use, and anything that plugged in needed to stay plugged in while in operation.

        Big advances in battery chemistry made things like cordless phones feasible by the 80’s, and all sorts of rechargeable devices in the 90’s.

  • aviationeast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    1970s is easy: the doorbell has a real small battery like in your car that can be recharged. It then has a built in radio to transmit a TV signal to a handle held computer/mainframe.

    Couches have built in power for convenience.

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’d probably be confused as to why it needs charging. “I don’t charge my doorbell, so why the manual process? Is running copper wire prohibitively expensive in the future?”

  • pound_heap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well, I realize that 1970s sounds like an age of dinosaurs to some people… But, people back then weren’t cavemen. They had electricity, batteries, video cameras, telephones.

    The concept of an electric outlet in a couch is easy - not sure, but they might even had such things back then. Like to feed a lamp or something. USB is just low voltage and different connector, from the power transmission perspective.

    The concept of a speakerphone with video signal is also easy. The only thing to grasp is that the devices and batteries became that miniature and efficient. Oh, and wireless.

    Explaining that all video and voice recordings from all these neat devices are actually stored by a gigantic corporation, processed with voice and face recognition algorithms, and used to enrich personal profiles collected on all parties of the conversation to boost profits of said corporations, and many people even pay for this - THAT I would find complicated to explain.