Mark Rober just set up one of the most interesting self-driving tests of 2025, and he did it by imitating Looney Tunes. The former NASA engineer and current YouTube mad scientist recreated the classic gag where Wile E. Coyote paints a tunnel onto a wall to fool the Road Runner.

Only this time, the test subject wasn’t a cartoon bird… it was a self-driving Tesla Model Y.

The result? A full-speed, 40 MPH impact straight into the wall. Watch the video and tell us what you think!

  • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Who here thinks that humans are going to notice this wall and stop? What a worthless engagement bait post. And y’all just eat it up.

    “most interesting” 🤦‍♂️

  • kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is why it’s fucking stupid Tesla removed Lidar sensors and relies on cameras only.

    But also who would want a tesla, fuck em

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They never had lidarr. They used to have radar and uss but they decided “vision” was good enough. This conveniently occurred when they had supply chain issues during covid.

    • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They also removed radar, which is what allowed them to make all of those “it saw something three vehicles ahead and braked to avoid a pileup that hadn’t even started yet” videos. Removing radar was the single most impactful change Tesla made in regards to FSD, and it’s all because Musk basically decided “people drive fine with just their eyes, so cars should too.”

    • AreaKode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was horrified when I learned that the autopilot relies entirely on cameras. Nope, nope, nope.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Leon said other sensors were unnecessary because human driving is all done through the sense of sight…proving that he has no idea how humans work either (despite purportedly being a human).

  • EaterOfLentils@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Apparently they keep getting tickets in China because they didn’t bother to adjust the settings to accommodate Chinese roads and traffic laws. Result is Tesla is getting utterly crushed by BYD in their one major market that doesn’t care about Elon’s antics.

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Huh, now I’m mildly interested in the differences in traffic laws in China vs US vs Europe that lead to Teslas getting more tickets in China than elsewhere.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I found this article. My takeaways were:

        1. No driving in bus lanes during certain times of day.
        2. No using the shoulder as a turn lane.
        3. No using a bike lane as a turn lane.
            • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I think their regs, while seemingly very basic rules of the road, are based because I live in the US and we have bike lanes here that just whole ass turn into turn lanes with almost no warning. I wish we could get basic decency for everyone on the road, too.

  • Magnus@lemmy.brandyapple.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I remember Elon foolishly saying his cars don’t need radar or lidar. Even software-disabling radar in cars that already had the hardware.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not even just his cars, he thinks the MILITARY, doesn’t need radar and can just use cameras to spot and track stealth fighters.

      He’s a fucking lunatic.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        As an augmentation, the ability to spot and track objects visually would be amazing.
        But then planes just have to fly above 10k ft, and pretty much guaranteed cloud cover.

  • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is this video being suppressed by the YouTube algorithm? I wonder if it’s because of Tesla or Disney. Or maybe it’s because of simulated child harm?

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It was removed because it was giving false positives. They should have upgraded it with lidar but decided to just remove it.

          • zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Bahaha, what kind of a bizarre statement is that?

            Was he trying to imply the government only uses spreadsheets and nosql DBs?

            Or did he think it was necessary to point out that your average government employee isn’t writing their own SQL to grab data they need?

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Someone said something he didn’t like so he blurted out the first ignorant thing that he thought of, as usual.

            • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Even then, that’s not really correct. People grab data through sql queries all the time. Mostly because all the front ends are trash.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          He’s had humans don’t use LiDAR so his cars shouldn’t have to. Of course humans have a brain, and he’s cars don’t, but you can’t tell him anything.

            • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I think it’s also reasonable to say a human dying because of their own actions is different than a human dying because a big corp cut costs on safety features in an entirely autonomous car where the human has no ability to stop what’s happening. (You can control them in current teslas, but they’re working on cars without human controls as well)

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Weymo have them beat then. They already have cars that essentially act like taxis and the only control the passenger has is an emergency stop button. But they don’t control the speed they don’t control the steering or anything.

                But those systems absolutely do have lidar because in order for them to be widely accepted they don’t need to be a bit safer than humans they need to be a lot safer than humans.

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Human drivers also make automobiles one of the most dangerous ways to travel.

              Same goes for Teslas. Just that the human that’s making them a dangerous way to travel is Elon Musk.

      • nialv7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Tesla had camera+radar+sonar, and that wasn’t their own tech - they used mobileye EyeQ back then. When they switched to in house tech they gradually ditched the radar and sonar which made no sense to me. But at the time I saw their lead say in an interview that this is superior and I believed. not anymore.

        they said doing so cut costs but obviously lidar/radar/sonar only gets cheaper over time, let alone the extra r&d costs because a vision only system is much more difficult to develop.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They are so expensive too! /s

      Who would have known electronics gets cheaper all the time?? /j

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Show someone footage of 9/11 and they‘ll think of 2001. Show someone footage of a burning or crashing Tesla 20 years from now and they‘ll think of 2025.

    • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Actually elon demanded that lidar be depricated because of phantom breaking years ago, they only use visible spectrum cameras now