And they’re already kissing Trump’s ass

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Of course they’re kissing Trump’s ass. How else is anyone gonna get anything done in the next 4 years? American democracy is broken, and under unitary executive theory endorsed by all branches of government the President is basically a king with term limits and no shiny hat. It’s no way to run a country, but it’s where we’re at so why would we expect TikTok to do anything else?

  • CorpuscularCrumpet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Good. Tiktok is fucking cancer.

    You people that are embracing cancer and not treating it are absolutely retarded.

  • RazTheCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m starting to think of Trump as one of those old school firefighters that would set fires and then swoop in to put the fire out lol.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, but the ban passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, randomly jammed inside of the global military spending package including funding the Ukrainian war effort and the genocide in Gaza (which is a must-support bill for Democrats and Republicans alike I guess).

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Except it doesn’t have the capability to put out fires, so it just starts them, then declares having put them out and leaves them burning

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      He was one of the first people saying to ban it in 2020. To me it’s more like he is easily swayed with lobbying so it ends up looking like he is a pioneer on pushing new policy when in actuality he is the first person people go to when they need to bribe a politician.

    • CorpuscularCrumpet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      He absolutely is. All presidents are.

      Those type of firefighters exists in droves still because that is not an old-school thing.

    • Zeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah, fuck the CCP for spying on Americans. The US Government would never do such a thing!

      • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I always wanted to ask but haven’t been able to until now…

        When you’re building the strawman, do you do it while the straw is still wet and then wait for it to dry or do you wait for the straw to cure first and then build it?

        I’d imagine fungus would be a key reason in the choice but I’m still unsure about the process and figured I’d ask an expert…

        Thanks in advance!

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Fun fact about straw, you have to keep the bales dry, because if they get wet they start to decompose, which generates heat, and since straw traps air, it’s insulating, meaning it can get hot enough to catch fire!

        • M1nds3nd@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          After looking up a few tutorials for making a scarecrow, it looks like using dried filling is best.

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          While there is a logical fallacy here I don’t think it’s a straw man.

          It’s some form of two wrongs make a right.

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Nobody made the argument they were responding to, they made it themselves and then posted a picture “owning” it

            That’s strawmanning

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            Some call it a what-aboutism, although theres debate on whether its usually fallacious or not. There have been cases illustrated where using what-aboutisms is a proper logical counter, but most the time people just like to shout fallacy at each other so they dont have to think about the point they are making.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              Whataboutism is a fallacy when it is used to justify a behavior instead of pointing out hypocrisy itself.

              “It’s okay because you do it too” vs “You can’t claim moral superiority in this case because”

      • CorpuscularCrumpet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Comparing the spying that both of these countries do on innocent citizens, as if they are anything alike, is demented.

        It’s not apples to apples. It’s comparing an orange to the sun.

        • Loss@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re right, the us govt captures all internet traffic, all calls, all texts, and has complete subpoena power for all companies that interact with anything in the us; while deploying drones, planes, and satellites that watch us citizens; while encouraging citizens to sell each other out to the government.

          It’s not comparable.

          • CorpuscularCrumpet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 hours ago

            As with all of the people agreeing with the government that created the is graphic, you clearly missed the point of my comment.

            Show me a government that has the capability to do that but doesn’t do it. And I’ll show you some other way in which it is significantly deficient.

            You all suffer from some significant brainwashing.

  • venaticorum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    This whole thing just comes across as craven and politically motivated by the US government. If they were really concerned with apps (whether or not they’re owned by the Chinese government) collecting and selling user data, they would pass adequate and enforceable privacy laws. Banning one specific app is addressing a symptom rather than a root cause, and any solution to an issue like this ought to apply to the entire field more broadly. I don’t necessarily think that banning TikTok is a bad thing, but to do so in such an obviously politically motivated way belies a lack of concern about the underlying issue (i.e. the mass harvesting of user data) in my opinion.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not to doubt that it’s politically motivated, but the ban law as written could be applied to any app with a country of origin on the US “Foreign Adversary” list AND declared to be a national security issue

    • Loss@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It was? How do you figure when no evidence of that was presented to Congress according to congressional members and senators?

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Sidestep providing the evidence and go straight for the personal attack. Nice.

        • Loss@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I create new accounts when I get bored or when an instance admin turns out to be a little [redacted] and decides to remove my account for being against US propaganda.

  • drthunder@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wish people knew that TikTok being banned was more about it not suppressing posts about Palestine than national security or whatever else they say. Antony Blinken and Mitt Romney outright said last year it was about stopping people from seeing the truth about Israel committing genocide. If the government actually cared about foreign influence operations they’d regulate data privacy and social media algorithms in some way (idk how, but I’m sure you could) but they obviously won’t because US companies manipulating people and stealing their data is totally fine.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      If that were true then they wouldn’t have given ByteDance the option to sell 80% to citizens and continue operating.

      The law also bans every company from doing the same thing, sending personal data to any of the listed adversarial nations or being more than 20% owned by them. Why ban every company if they only cared about the Palestine message?

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If that were true then they wouldn’t have given ByteDance the option to sell 80% to citizens and continue operating.

        Except the entire point of that is the U.S. ownership would succumb to that pressure.

      • drthunder@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Making ByteDance sell 80% to US companies is a win for the powers that be because then that too can be manipulated by right-wing oligarchs.

        I don’t trust Chinese companies all that much either, but Mitt Romney outright said this was about Palestine, you can see another reply of mine below with a link.

      • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        So how are a ton of people going to red note? Shouldn’t that have been banned a long time ago if they ban every company?

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Probably difficult to enforce if RedNote doesn’t have American servers or offices, we will see if anything happens.

    • firadin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      How did you go from “foreign influence operations” to “US companies manipulating people”

      • drthunder@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Facebook and YouTube have for years boosted conservative people and posts/videos: this is fine according to the powers that be.

        Russia and no doubt countless others run influence operations through all US social media companies: this is also fine according to the powers that be.

        China probably runs influence operations through a Chinese social media company: this is a national security problem that needs to be dealt with!!

        The reasons TikTok is maybe being banned are because it’s the only major social media that isn’t suppressing pro-Palestine speech and because it’s not owned by a right-wing US oligarch. Musk is the shadow president, Zuckerberg is blatantly sucking up to Trump, etc etc.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Blinken and Romney. name a more trustworthily duo!

      ironic you talk about manipulating people in a comment that’s goal is to…manipulate people.

      • drthunder@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I don’t trust either of them, but why would they lie about wanting to suppress support for Palestine? And if you don’t believe me, the State Department has them on record saying as much: https://www.state.gov/secretary-antony-j-blinken-at-mccain-institutes-2024-sedona-forum-keynote-conversation-with-senator-mitt-romney/

        SENATOR ROMNEY: A small parenthetical point, which is some wonder why there was such overwhelming support for us to shut down potentially TikTok or other entities of that nature. If you look at the postings on TikTok and the number of mentions of Palestinians relative to other social media sites, it’s overwhelmingly so among TikTok broadcasts. So I’d note that’s of real interest, and the President will get the chance to make action in that regard.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 hours ago

          if you’re only evidence is two liars that are on the record lying about anything, anything in the record from them can never be considered the truth.

          liars lie, regardless of if they tell the truth or not.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tik Tok removed platform access from their US userbase voluntarily.

    This was their choice.

    The law is literally not even being enforced.

    • fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Noteworthy thing I haven’t seen mentioned here: They apparently only removed app access. The website still works just fine.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Large businesses literally operate in conflict with the law until the law directly forces consequences, usually in monetary form. So, until they get caught and are forced not to do the thing. Explain to me why this is any different.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hey, look over here at the TikTok performative theatrics while we set up an oligarchy and rob you of your labor, your health, and your livelihood.

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Tiktoks removel is not a distraction from oligarchy, it is oligarchy in action. This is meta collecting on what they paid congress for.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        You see me complaining? I’ve never used TikTok, but the entire controversy around it is just wag-the-dog type distraction.

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    So I am assuming most Lemmy people don’t use Tiktok or Meta stuff. Here is some things you may or may not already know.

    • Shou (CEO) made a parting video praising Trump on the last day
    • Shou will be on the stage with all the other tech billionaires during inauguration
    • People have noticed the last couple days that FB and Instagram have had a “link your Tiktok account” so you don’t lose anything on the platform

    I think it’s pretty obvious now that Tiktok is going to become a part of Meta one way or another.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      People have noticed the last couple days that FB and Instagram have had a “link your Tiktok account”

      WTF, how is this not news everywhere?

      • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        170 million people

        Where’s that number coming from. Maybe you mean the 165 billion installs , but that’s not active users and double counts people installing on multiple devices. Tik tok has 50 million dau Of those maybe 10% is actually “speaking” and creating content that the other 90% consume so around 5 million people.

        And those 5 million people aren’t silenced, they can still go on to one of multiple apps that provide the same service and allows them to get there message out. He’ll they could come on to the fediverse and post blatant ccp propaganda and no one will do anything.

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        You think silencing half the entire population of the country is boomer lib shit?

        Ok, boomer.

    • brendansimms@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same! It is definitively unconstitutional and the us gov just pushed it through anyway (with even supreme court backing it up?!) Shit is crazy, and yet I see a lot of ‘no big loss’ type comments on it.

        • Traister101@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          The law boiled down says any applications from Rushia or China are inherently a security risk and therefore can be banned no questions asked (currently they have to go app by app) which to put it simply is extremely concerning. Straight up US great firewall type shit

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Not all apps, review/travel sites get a pass, and the decision is left to the president, which is a dumb way to do it.


            DIVISION H-- PROTECTING AMERICANS FROM FOREIGN ADVERSARY CONTROLLED APPLICATIONS ACT

            Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act

            (Sec. 2) This division prohibits distributing, maintaining, updating, or providing internet hosting services for a foreign adversary controlled application (e.g., TikTok). However, the prohibition does not apply to a covered application that executes a qualified divestiture as determined by the President.

            Under the division, a foreign adversary controlled application is an application directly or indirectly operated by (1) ByteDance, Ltd., TikTok, their subsidiaries, successors, related entities they control, or entities controlled by a foreign adversary country; or (2) a social media company that is controlled by a foreign adversary country and determined by the President to present a significant threat to national security. (Here, a social media company excludes any website or application primarily used to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews.)

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        The SCOTUS decision was wild too, because it was a fucking 9-0 vote. The decision was unanimous. That’s a word that’s virtually never used to describe the SCOTUS or any kind of government vote. That unanimous decision made it perfectly clear that the government knows something we don’t, and that TikTok had them fucking terrified. My bet is on the genocide being much worse than even TikTok was showing, but TikTok was the only place you could see anything about it that didn’t have a massive “Israel is just helping them root out terrorists” spin.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Tell that to the millions of American small businesses that thrived on the app. Billions of tax revenue just vanished.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I see this sentiment a lot but I don’t understand, which small business are doing all of their business exclusive on TikTok?

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          It’s less about only doing business on TikTok (there are many, however), but of all the other social media platforms, they get more engagement and sales from TikTok than any other platform. (Ask yourself how many people are successfully selling their products and services on Lemmy, for example)

          It allows people to make chained response videos that also shows their work, as well as illuminating the personality and goals of the people who run the business.

          Connectivity between videos, with video responses to comments, is a powerful tool that TikTok does better, and it’s created a boon for many who are self employed.

          When 170 million Americans are using the platform, your level of exposure skyrockets.

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            Ask yourself how many people are successfully selling their products and services on Lemmy, for example

            I’m still stuck on asking how many people are successfully selling their products and services on TikTok.

            Like, what businesses are these and what are they selling? I wouldn’t imagine any of these social media platforms would be good for selling anything on. What’s an example of something I could go on TikTok and buy? I couldn’t imagine buying anything on any social media platform. I’ve never even seen anyone selling anything on any social media platform. How would I even do that if I wanted to?

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          And Quality Patch, Mr Seems, various actual artists who showcase and sell their work, candle makers, authors, wood artisans, leather and metal workers, and everyone else who was doing well and making good products.

          Your flippance shows you know noting.

          • Whateley@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Yeah, that was quite inhumane of me. How can I hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth from werewolf gangbang authors and used underwear merchants and not despair?

      • cocomutative_diagram@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If TikTok has the power to “turn” youth into pro Palestine, they can also turn the youth pro China when China invades Taiwan.

        TikTok is in its expansion phase so it need to show its good will, but as soon as it is large enough, it will seek to do whatever make them the most money, like everyone else.

        Time and time again, big-tech controlled social media have intervened and will continue to intervene with public opinion, Meta, Xitter, TikTok, all in their own ways.

        If government decide to ban meta tomorrow, will you object as hard as banning tiktok?

        • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 hours ago

          If TikTok has the power to “turn” youth into pro Palestine, they can also turn the youth pro China when China invades Taiwan

          You’re not making the argument you think you’re making here. Tiktok showed young people the uncensored truth about the genocide. If showing the uncensored truth about Taiwan makes young people want an invasion by China, then it means China is right?

          • cocomutative_diagram@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            You would honestly believe a giant media conglomerate and one of the most influential tech monopolies in this hyper-capitalistic world shows people completely unbiased news, just out of the goodness of their heart? For their unconditional love towards the vulnerable underaged population that they intentionally attracted?

            • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              So let’s instead confine ourselves to social media from western countries which reflects exclusively western bias, whether through censorship as is the case of Meta/X, or through contributions by overwhelmingly white western men as is the case of Lemmy. Just look at politics.world and see what country most linked articles are from.

              Maybe, just maybe, having more diverse options, including social media from other countries not subjected to western bias, could be good? That way maybe you can see some realities hidden by the Chinese government heavily publicised in western social media, and viceversa

              • cocomutative_diagram@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 hours ago

                In principle yes, but it is in general dangerous to think that social media can be a learning moment and people should use whatever pushed to them to guide their behavior.

                The content is eventually controlled by several monopolies and will serve their own good. As social media are natural monopolies, it is also really hard to build ethical platforms that competes with the ones backed by capital.

                Westerners are priviliaged to have a diverse and free news/media landscape, non-profits pushing for truthful and accessible knowledge, and world-class educational institutions. I, as a Chinese, have never experienced such when growing up.

                Yet, I see people insist a giant Chinese tech monopoly is their best learning experience, instead of resorting to more time-proven, unbiased, and trust-worthy ways to learn. Doesn’t this sound dangerous to you?

                • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Westerners are priviliaged to have a diverse and free news/media landscape, non-profits pushing for truthful and accessible knowledge, and world-class educational institutions

                  Bullshit. Westerners fall for western propaganda as much as anyone. Most on Lemmy were certain that the submarine cables were destroyed by the Russians on purpose, turns out the consensus isn’t the case. Most on Lemmy were certain that Nordstream was blown up by Russian, turned out not to be the case. Most on Lemmy believe there’s an ongoing genocide against Uyghur people, turns out it’s not the case. Most on Lemmy believe there was a massacre in Tiananmen square (good luck asking them to spell it) because the CPC sent the PLA to murder protestors, instead of a clash between protestors and military which happened after weeks of pro-capitalist protests and started after protestors murdered some military personnel in negotiation attempts. Most on Lemmy are willing to forgive the support for Genocide in Gaza to the US and its constant imperialism and aren’t willing to do the same for other countries.

                  You’re just being extremely chauvinist and ignorant about the quality of information in the west, and unaware of the manufacture of consent and the fabrication of false information and narratives.

                  resorting to more time-proven, unbiased, and trust-worthy ways to learn

                  Which are these unbiased ways to learn you talk about? Can you provide me any examples?