• SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The rich are trying to pivot the Trump vicory into world domination before we can organize and dethrone the oligarchy.

      Google/Meta helping to spread misinformation is a big part of that.

      I wish I was kidding.

      Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

        • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Honestly, the most humane and least distasteful solution is to dispossess the billionaires of their billions. Not a drop of their blood need to be shed, should this be done.

          • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Too bad the billionaires just bought the government of the United States

            Let me know when you figure out how to peacefully redistribute the wealth of people who want to rule the world

      • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The evidence so far is that the primary response of the heinously rich when they fear for their lives is to spend more or much more on their security and their politicians rather than to change their evil greedy behavior at all. Those looking for any real solution to oligarchs need to consider this fact when evaluating what should be done.

  • cyd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Google has behind it an incoming US government that puts US economic interests first, and relishes bullying its allies. The EU is weak, divided, and geostrategically boxed in. It will bend the knee.

    • Tobberone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah… In fourth grade I was taught that there is nothing like an outer foe to create inner peace. I never imagined it to be the US to accomplish that, but here we are.

    • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The EU is doing great. It can pay for loads of stuff with the endless fines American tech companies rack up

      • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I gotta say that seemed pretty performative considering apple was obviously already moving that way with usb-c on all their devices.

          • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            :) I’m glad the EU did it. Having usb c for all of my devices is awesome.

            But they waited so long to do it. I think everything except the iPhone was already usb c (iirc) and given the supply chain lead times, the timing of the reg vs the release of the new usb c phone, I really think they had the usb-c phones in flight for a couple years.

            Maybe the looming threat of the reg made it happen. Maybe it made it happen faster. But it seemed like the direction they were headed.

            At the end of the day, I’m glad they regulate vs what the US does. Even if their regs aren’t perfect / late, they do something for their constituents.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The only reason the regulation happened is because Apple ignored the “industry, agree on a standard or we’ll set one for you” memo: By the time the EU passed the act all other manufacturers had already shaped up.

              That is: For other companies, the looming threat sufficed. Apple needed to be forced.

  • timestatic@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fine the heck out of them then. If they don’t pay the fine ban em. Plenty of alternatives out there. More competition in the search engine market would be better anyways.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Start criminal proceedings to imprison the leadership responsible for non-compliance. Seize their assets to pay for any fine.

      Why do we accept that all solutions to corporate crimes should be fines and kiddie gloves?

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This is definitely to avoid the ire of fuhrer trump. It’s also coincidence that meta is abandoning fact checking right before the new administration

    He will sic the dogs of regulation on them if they don’t dance to his tune

  • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I like this. I don’t think I need a large company fact-checking anything tbh. They already got too much influence and power, I don’t need them to control the narrative even more.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    And not a single bit of this would matter at all if YOU PEOPLE* would just know a damned thing!

    *present company excepted, of course.

  • anticunt4444@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Just sanction the US then. Kick them out of rammstein and rota and all the place they’re currently occupying.

  • HaiZhung@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I get the sentiment, who doesn’t want to dunk on Google?

    But the headline is needlessly inflammatory. There is no law yet; and google essentially is saying please please don’t implement it, it totally doesn’t make sense.

    Don’t get me wrong, the EU should still implement it. And once it is law; Google will also comply.

  • DukeHawthorne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I want to live in a world where the EU bans Google, but we all know the EU will just roll over and accept this.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If the links in the article are accurate, this doesn’t seem to be a “law”, but this thing: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/code-practice-disinformation

    Anyone know more about it than I could quickly find? Is this in any way legally enforceable?

    Obviously, I believe that governments have no legitimate business whatsoever telling us on the Internet what we can talk about, say to each other, etc.; but I would still like to know more about this particular attempt by the EU to do so anyway, so would appreciate more information.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The DSA contains provisions for combatting disinformation and as a very large online platform google is required to implement suitable practices. The DSA is a regulation, that is, immediately applicable law in all of the EU. As is usual for laws it’s written pretty generically and abstract, though, so the commission is also publishing more detailed documents that companies can use as check-lists.

      In essence, the difference between the tax code and the finance ministry publishing a paper on accounting best practices. You’re free to ignore the latter but that will likely make your life harder that in needs to be.

    • tree_frog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s set to become mandatory, i.e. law. According to the article.

      And this isn’t a free speech issue. It’s about disinformation. Folks can say what they want, but a political ad needs to clearly be a political ad. And disinformation can’t be profit motivated.

      It’s all in the article you just linked. You can say what ever you want, but if it’s bullshit, Google will need to flag it or face fines.

      • Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It isn’t law yet though, and it is the current iteration that Google won’t follow. We have yet to see how they will react if it actually becomes law. My guess is that they will, begrudgingly, bend the knee.

        • tree_frog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I said it isn’t law yet. And the article states that the law is forthcoming, and that Google does not intend to follow the forthcoming law.

  • MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Damn.

    Wish the rest of us could just ignore all laws & not face any consequences.

    What a fucking joke this entire system is.

    • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They don’t have a problem giving someone 100 years for a quarter bag of weed though. For a first time offense.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh that was long ago. it’s for not having a baby if you’re female now. Megacorps run usa and now the worst (which is best for some reason) ceo in the history of man will again be president and continue the clear path to government dismantling