• kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can tell us what you’d like us to call you. That’s referred to as your “Name”. You can leave the rest of the language alone. You don’t get to change your adverbs, participles, adjectives, predicates, etc.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You don’t get to change your adverbs, participles, adjectives, predicates, etc.

      Says who? You? Are you the arbiter of language?

      I’ll call you Mrs. I’ll call you Mr. But the rest, nuh uh.

      Really? Not even Ms.? Because I imagine a lot of younger women would feel pretty insulted by you calling them Mrs.

          • kitnaht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I simply follow the rules, I don’t attempt to change them and force everyone else to follow mine.

            “Of course” because it should be obvious. You were taught english too.

            I would of course include Dr. as well, as that’s part of someone’s name. But as I’m slightly on the spectrum, when people start trying to change my language based on their whims, it throws me.

            I’m not going to start adding Xe and Xir and all sorts of rules to my ruleset because someone decided a name was too bland for them.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              What rules? Where do these rules come from? Who codified them? Can you please show me where they are laid out?

              • NormalPerson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s against the law! Please turn yourself in to the nearest police precinct.

                Being respectful of everyone’s person would hurt my lil brain tryin to remember all those words.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Culture War aside, that’s not how language works. You have as much understanding to the history of language as you have basic dignity to other human beings.

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Looks like you’re getting a lot of people riled up here.

      I’m curious about why you find it so objectionable for someone to choose their pronouns but are fine with name changes.

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Because the rules of the English language are the same for everybody. You don’t just get to go around telling people they have to use a different ruleset for you or when they are around you. It’s pretentious as fuck to expect people to cater their use of the language like that. That’s exactly what names are for.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because the rules of the English language are the same for everybody. You don’t just get to go around telling people they have to use a different ruleset for you or when they are around you. It’s pretentious as fuck to expect people to cater their use of the language like that. That’s exactly what names are for.

          Certainly, the rules of the English language exist for a reason. For me, that’s to communicate and convey information. If you unilaterally decide to change the language, then your words can fail to communicate what you intend. Although, I don’t think that applies here. Correct me if you think otherwise.

          If anything, it seems like the “new” pronoun rules you see today are people trying to enforce the standard English rules. He/she communicates someone’s gender presentation. If you refer to “him” between someone who looks masculine versus feminine, then you’ll assume that the “him” refers to the one that’s masculine-presenting. That’s how English usually works, and it works this way to allow us more efficient communication. Of course, this doesn’t work 100% of the time because there are many axes and a gradient on each of these axes between what we consider masculine or feminine. What would the English language dictate when you’re near one extreme on some axes and the other extreme on others? I don’t believe we have any well defined and useful rules for this besides the preference of the person it’s referring to. Again, do correct me if I get anything wrong.

    • flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      But… you can change all of those things, adverbs, participles, adjectives, predicates, you can change all of them by changing your behaviour and characteristics… You can’t even get your own stupid arguments to be correct.

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Oh look how smart you are by pointing out that YOU can change those things by acting differently; and the other thing I’m referring to is you forcing OTHERS to act differently. If you’re a he, or a she, I’m absolutely fully in support. I am not calling you Xe, or Xir and changing other parts of my language to accommodate you being so insecure that a NAME isn’t good enough for you.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      nuh uh.

      Newfangled terminology

      Thoughts on prescribing use of the OG word only?

      You don’t get to change your adverbs, participles, adjectives, predicates, etc.

      True, not in repressive societies. And look, I have limits, I’ll be hard pressed to refer to someone as squirrelkinlifragilisticexpialidocious every time. But you’d made a reasonable accommodation in polite company I figure?

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    AceFuzzLord can’t wait for the use of all pronouns to be banned and English papers won’t be legally allowed to use basic words such as “I”, “Me”, “You”, etcetera. That’ll teach the libs!

    /s

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      what, which, who, whom, whose, this, that, these, and those, everybody, either, none, and something,

      Amongothers. It’s ironic conservatives know so little grammar that they can’t even add “personal” to before “pronouns” to make it at least slightly more accurate, but no.

  • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    My native language (Türkish) does not have grammatical gender. Gender in grammar is just silly and useless.