I only use work hardware for work. I only use work networks for work. I have a cell phone off wifi for everything else
I only use work hardware for work. I only use work networks for work. I have a cell phone off wifi for everything else
Op why don’t you suggest what an acceptable reply looks like? You’re pretty restricted on what type of advice you’re seeking. Maybe then folks can ad libs in the thing that will help.
And ultimately if you are trying to macgyver together anti drone tech you are beyond fucked and should have spent that energy pursuing other means of privacy.
What about baseball and track?
Loser talk. Do you see the masturbatory way you are reveling in these negative responses? Will you acknowledge you are dwelling in hyper negativity, seemingly for the lulz?
The lack of understanding that indeed, you may struggle to control it, BUT YOU’RE STILL RESPONSIBLE FOR IT
Captain Titus! Secure the burger town!
deleted by creator
They literally just fucking sit there, I’ve seen Jumanji I know what they could do, they just choose not to
Relevant
Wouldn’t fungus be more immediately interested in being among us?
Ok, consider it done.
19/f/Cali always
You think a person’s worth is tied to their genes. Pretty yuck. I disagreed and explained how.
For the record I was calling YOU out for linking a person to their genes, just not directly, trying to be courteous to the conversation.
Keep replying now, and you’re just slapfighting. Not worth it. I said in the last comment our positions are well known and the conversation is functionally concluded.
It’s a bad gene. It’s literally the contextually appropriate description of a factor involved in a situation.
Sorry it hurts your feelings
We’ve both made our points and opinions known here.
Why would there be communal ownership of personal goods? The stuff is alexi 's
I mean if it’s a damaged or failed it’s a bad gene. It caused ms!
It’s not shitting on a person, it’s discussing a condition.
I can understand that discussion can lead to eugenics style thoughts.
“Oh that person has tons of bad genes, they therefore are bad”. That’s wrong though, a person can have a super fucked up body but it doesn’t change their value or goodness.
When discussing a condition, the genes that improve or cause that condition can be described as good or bad.
Context matters.
Weird almost duplicate replies
Yes but those in the coops have their own possessions. Certainly if you try to take away something as basic as the food they intend to eat themselves they are going to have limits.
A co op for managing the profits and work of a business makes great sense. But even hard core communists want their own pants and shoes and would be reluctant to give away thier own needs.
Obviously a deal communes drive towards is provide based on your ability, be provided to based on your needs.
I think the meme pushes on the perception of the individual of their “needs” (real or hypothetical)
Lereddit hoomor