It’s not special rights, it’s project materials approved by leadership, and noted on a published and approved feature roadmap

Edit assuming requisitioning a scaled db replica is “special” is kinda aligned with the meme lol

Even with more info these articles just devolve into

Mario man bad but we all still love Mario? New Zelda in the spring be sure to line up now.

Lol it’s not a ban, it’s a comment that suggests these articles are of poor quality

Meh it’s usually for shitty companies that expect their devs to write real software, ssh into things, access databases, but put the same hurdles in front of them as joeblow from sales who can’t use an ipad to buy a sandwich without clicking a phishing link. So every new project is slowed down cause it takes weeks of emails and teams conversations to get a damn db sandbox and it’s annoying.

On the other hand IT doesn’t know you and has millions of issues to attend to

Yep. Who did Dasani bottle all that water for? Paying humans with mouths

Where communist

Hell yeah brother

Holy shit

Apologizing after the fact can’t erase y response, unless you’d prefer I go back and edit.

My dude I don’t know shit other than consent is king. Does that admission appease you? The performers are uncomfortable and I care nothing about any real world limitations of the panel tour circuit. If they can’t do it right don’t do it at all. Volunteers or negative guest interactions are meaningless

Enjoy your win, you’re clearly so learned on the topic, leave me alone

As I said, you started with DK. How are you surprised I didn’t read further, and am unfriendly?

My point centered on consent, and someone sent me a dismissive opening on a long message. What’s to be done? Discard it.

Edit ZERO concerns are worth discussing if the consent of participants can’t be achieved.

Let’s be clear, opening with a dunning Kruger callout is rude. No one is an expert here, everyone is anonymous. It’s 100% unidan/jackdaw energy.

Further, I didn’t read your wall of text because nothing other than consent matters. If the performers are uncomfortable, I don’t care if they need the fuckin national guard to facilitate ID checks. I care nothing about the hurdles involved.

The whole schtick here is le redditor and I’ll stick with the simple “consent established, or leave”.

Lol what the fuck this is the most “well actually” I’ve ever seen.

Consent trumps all. If the performers are uncomfortable, it doesn’t matter how challenging the customer dynamic is.

If you hold an event, get the proper staff to keep your entertainers supported. Or don’t do it.

Concerts ID people all the time. The staff are available. Don’t act like this is some yet unheard-of Herculean task.

Agree in general. Ez fix: strings attached that it’s anonymous and unattached. A third party manages the exchange, and everyone is under oath. A step in the right direction at least

Seriously. It’s all shit posting and vidya until legal council from a multinational corporation is knocking at your door.

I love all the comments implying this dude is a coward. Total armchair shit

If the panel members are uncomfortable, it’s their choice.

They aren’t consenting to conducting adult discussion with kids around.

You can card everyone. You’re already carding their ticket.

Just state at purchase you must be X to enter.

And at the door.

Then when people enter: “ID and ticket please!”

You’re just learning.

You should always be paying attention, and vigilant. But over time you don’t actively think about keeping the car between the lines, you just do it. You don’t think about accelerating a bit to maintain speed when a hill starts, you just do it. Etc etc. Same with driving a manual transmission. At first it’s all so much. Pat your head and rub your belly. But eventually it becomes a learned skill you don’t actively focus on.

The act of drawing this is a brain sexualizing itself