• Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Right? Like it has its moments of good and bad. I mean it’s not an Oscar winner, but it wasn’t so bad that I lost interest.

        Tbh I thought JLo did a pretty good job.

        • CptEnder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Damn JLo was my main reason not to watch, historically she’s just not that great. But if she pulled it off or made it kinda self-aware I’ll check it out.

          65 is also really good.

          • Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Well it’s still JLo. If you aren’t much a fan you won’t be too impressed. Imo she can be fairly one directional in her movies.

            That said, when I watch a movie that has heavy CGI I try and take a step back throughout the movie from all the special effects and evaluate an actors performance.

            Ya ok sounds pretentious, but I try to imagine the environment they are in when acting. It’s basically nothing but a green box, with someone off to the side reading lines.

            If they can give a fairly believable performance I’m impressed, because we see all the special effects, editing, direction and production. The actor has to imagine it, and hope they don’t look like a dumbass in post.

            65 was alright. Wanted more dinosaurs though lol