Now that we have final numbers. It appears that Harris had all the white & black support she needed for an EC victory. But Trump outright flipping Latino men and making huge gains with Latino women seems to have made all the difference.

What do you think?

First image is 2024, second is 2020.

  • enbyecho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    42 minutes ago

    I know! Let’s blame EVERYBODY. That way nobody is left out and we can just admit we ALL fucked up so next time we can constructively work together to NOT fuck up instead of slinging mud at each other for the next four years.

  • Revonult@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 hour ago

    White people voting for the right is the problem. Like how can we go on here and blame Latinos for shifting when such a high percentage of white people voted for him? Especially when you factor in the population size and not just % left or right.

    I am ashamed of my peers.

  • Bear@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Whole thread full of people blaming an entire race and sex whether that’s Latinos, Latino men, Whites, or White men. You ask a stupid question and you get stupid answers.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If that lasr column is population, latino men are 1/7 compared to white men. So the larger difference is much smaller than it appears. And how did there get to be so many more latino women than men.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Please be careful whenever you ask these questions. It’s so easy to blame one single minority group for a widespread failure. Of course analysis of individual voting groups is legitimate, as long as you properly frame what you’re doing.

    This is a serious issue both because of the connection with racism (i.e., it’s the Latinos’ fault) and abdication of responsibility (i.e., we bear no responsibility).

    • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      What about all the white women who voted for Trump? Benefitting from structural racism is a helluva drug

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    A functional, coherent working class policy would’ve ticked some of those numbers in the campaign’s favor across the board without even having to divide by race or gender.

  • sygnius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    As a data analyst, the way the two graphs are setup terribly. There’s really not enough information to come up with any conclusions from the charts.

    Also, first, there’s not enough information from the graphs to determine the situation since it’s only by percentages and not population. Second, our system is based on the winners of each state and used by the electoral votes. So overall popular vote isn’t going to determine who got elected, even if the chart showed all blue for all demographics.

  • Krono@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Your narrative is that Latinos “shifted right” but I think this is a false framing- it was the Biden/Harris administration that shifted hard right on its proposed immigration policies and it left many Latino voters feeling politically abandoned.

    Look at the Democrats’ 2024 immigration bill- it is deportations, immigration quotas, and building the wall - while including nothing “left of center” such as amnesty. It is literally a Trump 2016 wishlist.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I think you’re trying to force a narrative on to this that doesn’t exist. You’re assuming that many of these Latino voters are against harder immigration policy. Polls are telling us the opposite. Poles are telling us that a lot of these Latinos that voted for Trump want this. They didn’t think Biden was too strong on immigration they thought he was too weak.

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This literally makes no sense. That immigration bill was bipartisan. And if Latinos felt Dems shifted to far right (which is laughable if you actually look at the policies), why would they vote even further right? THAT MAKES NO SENSE!

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      wow, you answer one question about abortion by saying immigrants are rapists and suddenly people feel abandoned. tsk tsk.

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m not proposing a “solution” here, but the logic is obvious: as the Democratic Party moves to the right, their traditional base becomes more alienated and less incentivized to vote.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        A lot of Latinos are fairly conservative people, a lot of them are strongly Catholic with all of the baggage that comes with it, etc.

        Basically the only major policy reason they ever leaned towards the democrats is immigration, so with the Dems going further right on immigration it makes a lot of sense for some of them to be jumping ship

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Populist messaging is popular because it acknowledges that people are suffering and offers easy “solutions” to it.

        Most folks don’t actually want to hear the details, they’re both busy and don’t fucking understand it without the benefits of a educational system that has been systemically destroyed for decades.

        Trump said he’ll fix the economy and blamed Biden, Harris wanted to pretend that the lines went up so things were good because she was effectively burdened as an incumbent candidate.

        Harris decentivized her base of support by chasing Lucy’s football of Republicans that aren’t fucking fascists, going after the Cheney votes of all fucking things, Trump siphoned votes from people that don’t quite know how to fix the problem but know there is a problem.

        You can point to Harris’s specific policies all you want, the people you need to get to the polls and vote for you don’t know about them because they’re boring.

      • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        15 million of them. That is a staggering number.

        It’s also not an accurate number. The official count for Biden in 2020 was about 81.3 million (found many places online, but the official one is a good choice) and the unofficial count for Harris by AP so far is about 74.3 million. That’s about 7 million, which is less than half of what you claimed.

        People have got to stop just posting straight up false information. If you don’t know, don’t post.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 hours ago

            No, if you said it a week ago it would be outdated. The fact that you’re still saying it is what makes it false. As you point it out new information is available. You’re just using old information still.

            By comparison if I wrote a book in the 1600s about the medical necessity of leaching, that would be outdated today. If I wrote a book about the medical necessity of leaching in 2024 that would just be false.

            • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I didn’t write a book or claim to be an authority on the subject. I stated what I remember on a subject I had read an article about 2 weeks ago.

          • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 hours ago

            We both know the reasonable way to interpret your post, and the way nearly everybody would interpret it, is that that’s the current or final count. It’s also outdated to say 74 million fewer people voted for Harris, but at one point, that was in fact the count. But it’s more than outdated - it’s misleading to the point of being factually inaccurate to any observer.

            I can’t believe instead of being like “oh shit, I made a mistake, my bad, I better think for a second about this in the future” you’re going to try to justify it. Whatever, that’s social media at this point I guess. Surely I’m not the problem, says everybody feeding misinformation in a giant circle. I thought Lemmy might be better, but it’s just not. Thank you for convincing me to finally give all social media up.

            • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I didn’t know it was outdated at the time. I don’t constantly check and double things I read in passing to see if it has been updated. I am not a professional in the field.

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    After Donald Trump called every stripe of Latino, rapists and murderers, publicly, often and loudly, More Latinos voted for Donald Trump in this past election than have ever voted for any Republican candidate in any American election ever. Spin it any way you like.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I used to joke that America is a terrible place, full of narcisists, liars, and assholes.

      Trump isn’t the cause of this. He’s just exposed how much those jokes are based on reality, and are no longer jokes.

      He’s brought to the forefront our worst qualities, and confirmed the fact that no matter how much progress America has made, we’re all still just a bunch of racists and assholes. And this time it’s not a joke. It’s confirmed.

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It appears that’s what won him the election. Yes turnout was down, but the demo percentages from 2020 to 2024 are not that much different outside of Latino voters.

      And I must ask? How did Trump pull this off? And would Kamala have won without the Latino rightward shift?

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It appears that’s what won him the election

        There’s hundreds of “what if” imagined scenario’s that would end up with a different result.

      • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Donald Trump doubled (+100%) the black vote he received in 2020. Across the board minorities saw change in putting Trump back in the big seat, as apposed to the disaster he will bring to them, and their families. People went through the pandemic, only to be hit with what’s felt like the largest peacetime inflation, which was not handled by the Biden administration. Normal people don’t care about economic numbers when their paying 30-50% more for milk, eggs, bread, and rent. When faced with more of the same with no real enumerated plan to get better, and back patting, they voted for different, come what may. You know which minority group didn’t break right, Jews (+5% 3.5% being the margin of error).

        • socsa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Biden handled Trump’s inflation expertly though. Everyone in 2021 said we would go through a recession, and we got a soft landing instead. And groceries are not 30% more expensive. They are around 15% above 2019 prices, not even that far out from historical inflation rates.

          Trump won because of economic gaslighting and you and half the people on the internet still repeat these lies.

        • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Trump gained 2% of black men, and lost 2% of black women. He made virtually no gains with black voters.

          He gained literally 1% of them. I don’t know where this narrative of trump making massive gains with black people is coming from. All the data suggest at best, a very small gain from 2020 compared to the enormous gains he received with Latinos.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I don’t think this is what you intended OP but we should be careful not to blame voters here. Trump and his enablers are to blame for what he does, not voters.

    That said, this is interesting. The shift to Trump among most communities was tiny, which could explain why most people were so surprised by this outcome. But why did Latinos shift to the right so much? That’s what I’d like to know.

    The shift in the other category was also huge. Are those mostly Asian voters?

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m not blaming anyone, I’m just pointing out the actual data and asking how & why? For example,

      White turnout increased this election, but trump lost some white men & women support again like he did in 2020. And it appears Harris did bettter with white women than Obama, Hillary or Biden. The white vote didn’t change that much.

      Black turnout was slightly down, and Trump was able to make a small 2% gain from black men, which isn’t much considering they made up 5% of the electorate this election.

      As for the “other” demo. It’s every other ethnicity, but none of them are really big enough to have really big impact unless a specific state has a very large percentage of them and they all go overwhelmingly one way.

      So I’m just saying, the only big outlier I see is the Latino vote. Which shifted HUGE for trump, and it appears that’s what won him the election. And I’m asking is that true? And if so, why? Compared to other demos.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I don’t think anyone shifted right. They just didn’t want whatever it was that Harris was selling.

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Ummm, yes they did. Latino male turnout went up 1%. More of them voted this election than 2020. Which means they shifted right.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The percentage of all Latino voters going up between 2020 and 2024 doesn’t necessarily mean there was more turn out from Latinos; if the voter demographics have shifted between 2020 and 2024 so that Latinos make up 1% more of the population, then they are still turning out at the exact same per capita rate as before, as a group.

        Which sounds like a short time, but that’s a small shift and plenty of people turn 18 every day.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Non sequitur, there are many analyses of the party change and they don’t all boil down to left vs right.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Shifted right means their policy preferences moved right. That is not the entirety of why someone votes a given way. Some probably did shift right. Others may have thought Trump had better hair. It’s an analog world and you have to dive into the weeds to understand things. You can’t look at one number and think it explains everything.