• andrewthe95th@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I feel like you guys are addicted to letting perfect be the enemy of good. Yes, Bluesky being corporate run will probably be an issue down the line, but if it becomes mainstream then people will be used to seeing .APP.INSTANCE and feel more comfortable with the fediverse interface, which I know at least for me was a big hurdle. Like seriously, the fact that the next big thing is federated, even if in name only, is a big step forward.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bluesky is such a huge improvement over twitter and so many people are just ignoring that. Yes, the app is centralized, but you can still host your own data if you choose. Plus, the customizable feeds, algorithms, and moderation lists are all great.

    • xavier_berthiaume@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah I’m a huge believer in federated systems but I believe that a lot of ‘normies’ going to bluesky is a huge step in the right direction. Even though most don’t know anything about the tech behind it and migrate because twitter has become a bot infested right wing hell scape, they still are one step closer to being fully integrated to the fediverse.

    • Cheems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Expecting perfection is a huge problem in all aspects of life. People just want instant perfection and aren’t willing to work towards it. Then there’s just apathy and that leads to stagnation or worse regression.

      • Nommer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’ve had less toxic experiences on reddit. Here I’ve had people use my post history to insult me and I even had some jackass respond to me 3 months later after some change Firefox did to “prove” he was right. Even though he was still wrong. Not to mention the tankies and other troll instances. I deleted my account on reddit years ago due to the toxicity there and I still find it less toxic now than Lemmy whenever I lurk there. Lemmy is dying because of the toxicity here. My subscribed feed used to have at least an hour or two of content to look at but it’s slowly been less and less, and mostly just automated bot posts now. I spend less than 10 minutes a day here now because there’s just nothing here. And I know someone is going to be a dick when replying to this and I’ll just have to block 2 or 3 people again.

        • ProtecyaTec@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          lol you called dude a “Fucking retard” for posting a link on a 3 month old comment thread that you could have just ignored.

          I generally look at someone’s comment history before replying to them to see if it’s even worth a reply. The internet has been and always will be (without heavy authoritarian moderation) full of trolls, Bad Faith Actors, and idiots. Block everyone, cry victim, whatever makes you feel better. Maybe if you keep running into assholes and trolls you should reflect on your comment history and how you interact with people online. The kind of comments you feel the need to comment back to (because you don’t need to comment on anything, like ever) you don’t need to.

          It’s wild that you don’t have the self-reflection to realize that your comments calling people “retards” and “morons” perpetuate the same toxicity that you’re complaining about.

          Welcome to the Internet though.

          • Nommer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            30 days ago

            You’re the problem and exactly the type of person to block so thanks for proving my point.

            I also want to point out how you could’ve just not responded instead of trying to pick a fight. Also even more irony how you claim I don’t have self reflection but then you come in and do the exact aggressive behavior that I explained in my post but none of you ever stop to think that just maybe I don’t care anymore about being nice on this app due to you people. Get over yourself.

            • ProtecyaTec@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              30 days ago

              I’m not the one complaining “people are mean”. You’re either a troll or incapable of self-reflection, which is why your “block list” is just going to keep growing and growing, and you’ll never learn or change.

              Good luck on your journey though.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          When Reddit happens to pop up on Google search results for something, I sometimes check my old account inbox. There have been two separate accounts replying to a years old anti-pseudoscience post of mine saying that if I don’t believe the moon is plasma, then I won’t be right with Jesus. Yes, really. Only one of them knows how to properly capitalize sentences, so it’s definitely two separate people.

          At least on Lemmy, blocking two instances cuts out most of the tankie crap and the experience becomes immediately better.

      • TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I did. The userbase in most of the subs there is warmer, not hostile, and much, MUCH less gatekeepy.

        If lemmy ever wants to grow and actually succeed, I don’t see it happening with people acting like they are acting now.

        • ComradeMiao@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’ve had the exact opposite experience except people are anti blsky and reddit. That isn’t hostile.

          • TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’ve had terrible experience with mainly tankies, which infest this site to its core. That was what mainly made it so hostile. Aversion to bluesky and reddit made it very gatekeepy

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Reddit’s core business model from day one was to fake engagement. This isn’t calling your nan’s IMs a cyber attack. We’re talking about a community that’s been outted repeatedly for hosting artificial content.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My Mastodon experience is far more pleasant than that of Lemmy.

      My sense is Mastodon is far less left leaning (but still left of center) but it may just be a product of who I’m following and the tags I’m following.

      • Carl@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would love to have an unbiased Lemmy. But this is filled with mostly extreme far left people I talked to. I also get down voted any time I mention most people don’t use Imperial/Fahrenheit, except 5% of the world. Lemmy feels kind of hostile for open discussion.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, I think I saw that post.

          Lots of “it’s OK when we do it” sentiment.

          I’ve noticed the majority (or at least the vocal ones) don’t really stand on principles such as free speech. And I don’t mean as in a “free speech” Lemmy instance. I mean in terms of inalienable rights.

          To many here, things like that are only for the “good” people, as determined by them.

        • Kaity@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Have you considered that US standard unit users know that and it’s just annoying when someone points it out unnecessarily for the hundredth time?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        My sense is Mastodon is far less left leaning (but still left of center)

        Begging the question of what you think constitutes the political “center”, given how fash everything has become.

  • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Twitter’s already served its purpose. People slagging it off because it’s losing money really don’t understand that it won a country.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seriously, seizing the means of mass communication means you own democracy, you own the governement, you own everything. Twitter, while it remains how the cultural elites communicate, is worth basically 30 trillions.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had originally not expected it to last a year of Peon Muck’s ownership, but hopefully it’ll finish dying (or fall into complete irrelevance) by the end of 2025.

  • Sabata@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Twitter user base must be burned by, then kill 2 platforms before they can truly understand and ascend.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ll be more excited about that when they start allowing larger federated instances.

      I haven’t read a ton about it, I have to admit, but last I read, federated instances are limited in number of accounts.

      More generally, the idea that taking crypto bro money will allow them to stay as open as Mastodon sounds unlikely to me.

  • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Heres the thing with federation

    It will always be more complicated, and lead to smaller segregated communities. This mitigstes the network effect social media services rely on

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The consumer lockin then monetization lockdown cycle always sheds users. I think eventually most federated systems will gain users, albeit slowly.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The proof is that mastodon user base is steadily going up. There hasn’t been a giant spike in a while but the barrier to monetization is too high for it to shed users from that. Its more like how wikipedia has outlived google as a resource despite wikipedia not being particularly better now than soon after it started.

  • Ascend910@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t really under the hate towards BlueSky, did they do something really unacceptable that I am missing out on?

    • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The idea is that these social media sites always become monopolies. That occurs because no one can communicate with each other across platforms, which eventually leads to a majority of users migrating to a single platform over time. Once that happens, the social media group no longer has to try and the media site enshittifies slowly over time. On top of this, the insane amount of users also cripples the centralized system’s ability to self-moderate properly, leading to user-based enshittification as well.

      With federated social media, that barrier doesn’t exist, and, in theory, the subsequent conglomeration of users doesn’t happen. Additionally, federated instances can be self-hosted and sport much smaller userbases which can make self-moderation much simpler.

      The joke in the video is that rather than switching to federated social media like mastodon and lemmy, twitter users chose to go to yet another centralized social media site (which while having a federation protocol, is unlikely to have users utilizing that defederation). Essentially, Billy is abandoning twitter to go to another site which will potentially have the same downward trend as twitter did before.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    bluesky has made better choices - the starter packs and user lists are great for new users. They managed to add quote tweets but let the quoted person opt out of dog piles. It looks like they added options for custom algorithms too.

    Bluesky will be enshittified but mastodon should be taking notes if they want to pick up people next wave.

    The bluesky system is just way better. The local/fed feeds on masto are just wasted.

    • BMTea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What if we’re wrong and BlueSky just gets better? I mean, with some of the corporate trappings of old Twitter, but still user-friendly, big userbases, vibrant subcultures and banning troublemakers?

      • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        the concept of more than one website is so challenging for plebs.

        use both and please don’t bridge bsky to the fedi.

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean even if it repeats “the Twitter mistake” that’d still be another 13-14 years to go. Who knows where short-form social media will be conceptually in that time and whether any competition in the space is even still relevant.

      • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It will, but it still has that countdown timer over its head.

        The future is the fediverse, some yet-to-be-invented non-corporate equivalent, or offline.

    • skrlet13@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bluesky has useful tools. But (almost) all lists were made by the community of Bluesky users. Curation was made by users.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Curation was made by users.

        Right, users not corporations make social networks, so the community not for profit corporations should own those social networks.

        Can we not all see this as the same old pattern of predatory rent seeking behavior applied to online communities just seasoned with even more jargon and condescending handwaved half explanations?

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The block lists for various types of assholes are also a marvellous invention. It’s so nice to block all of MAGA at a click

  • 8000gnat@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    why the fuck does no one change the trashass looking shadowed white impact font default text treatment on the meme generator

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If the internet has a future, it’s on the Fediverse. We work around capitalism to avoid enshittification, or we let it defer our future further.

    In the meantime, the Fediverse needs to get shiny and intuitive. The sign that something is cumbersome and hard to use is people saying “it’s not that bad”.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      People may disagree with how BlueSky is organized and architected, but I get why they decided to do what they did. User experience.

      Their architectural decisions mean that people don’t have to worry about instances confusing people, and the org structure means is easy to staff a proper dedicated experience team that can be working, planning, and testing before big expensive decisions are committed to code.

      • Sl00k@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Bluesky is apart of the Fediverse and the quicker ActivityPub sites accommodate that fact the quicker we’ll have an open internet.

        This pissing fight between ActivityPub sites and Bluesky is dumb and doesn’t further an open internet.

        Not directed at you but to a lot, go put time into making Mastodon compatible with atProto instead of bitching.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Didn’t BlueSky come up with their own federation system because… Fuck you?

          I mean, what was wrong with using the ActivityPub standard?

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            30 days ago

            I can’t find the source but if I recall bluesky relies on running feeds through central servers and it has patents on its methods so I would say bsky federation has some asterisks. They have done a great job insulating users from the structural elements which reduces confusion.

        • Jesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Filing as a B corp wouldn’t be my first choice if I was trying to prioritize getting rich.

          • wabafee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            That is how it usually starts. It start innocent but the moment you see potential money or the funding runs out you either become like OpenAI, Google or go obscure worst bankruptcy. It does not help that their protocol is basically how search engine works today. They control the flow of information and funded by venture capital.

            • saigot@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              30 days ago

              Yeah probably. If you told me in 2013 that reddit would go to shit in 2023 I would not really do anything different. Knowing bluesky will go to shit wouldn’t really change anything (if I was a fan of the Twitter format) either.