• BonerMan@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not really, look at anno for example. Its just the big titles that are regarded as not good.

        • BonerMan@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          OK, I personally think 1404 with the interesting and challenging campaign including the Venice dlc was the top, afterwards I think 1800 is the next best. My most controversial opinion is that both 2070 and 2205 where good and well made games, with some flaws of course but that doesn’t mean its bad. Shure some disliked the setting and I was septic as well.

          • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Never played the futuristic ones. What appealed to me with the anno games was the atmosphere of sails and settlers.

          • .Donuts@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I agree on 2070 and 2205. I really enjoyed them and I chalked it up to me liking sci-fi enough to be able to bear it.

        • BonerMan@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          OK, but who gives a shit about a monopoly game? Either play it like a normal person, when drinking with friends or don’t.

          • icecreamtaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’ve watched huge vtubers play it multiple times and every single time the game ends early from a crash. Or the game accidentally bankrupts a player. It’s bad publicity

            • BonerMan@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              HM… Yeah thats Bad publicity.

              But that never happened to me, and I played both games for over 200 hours each. I even played them on Linux through emulation and it didn’t happen.

      • olicvb@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yea, I mean Watchdogs 2, The Division, Steep, I know some friends loved For Honor and R6: Siege is amazing (idk how the game looks today tho with all the updates they made).

        Seems people tend to see ubisoft as AC and FarCry only.

        • Harvey656@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          All of those games you just picked are quite old, watchdogs 2 came out in 2016, these games no longer are the ubishit standard, they are far above it. Plus Ubispft doesn’t make sequels to those games anymore, for whatever reason.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I still applaud Watch Dogs 2 for integrating offline and online play much better than Dark Souls did. You can still pause the game, for instance.

        • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I personally loved Avatar and Outlaws.

          They’re not groundbreaking games, but they’re both very immersive and for fans of both franchises it’s a lot more fun to explore in these games.