• kurcatovium@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If I were to buy used laptop, I’d want 8th gen or newer because that’s where intel finally made more than dual core for mobile.

          • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ah, so there won’t be overflow of big bussiness 8th gen laptops… Nevermind, I’d still avoid 7th gen myself.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I literally daily drive a laptop with a 4c/8t processor (6700-HQ) so I’m not sure what you’re talking about other than perhaps the lower end i5s

          Edit to add, my other laptop with a third gen i5 is getting pretty long in the tooth though, so I wouldn’t go out of my way for something that old though

          • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean mainstream processors of that age. Even regular i7s of 7th gen were just dual cores with HT.

            • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I was very confused by your comment so I took a poke around Intel ark. I see what you mean now, most mobile processors for 4th and 6th gen (probably the most common generations for used PCs that are incompatible with 11) have 2c/4t on the U series processors, but looks like any HQ processor gets a full 4 cores and if it’s an i7 it gets hyper threading, putting them closer to parity with their desktop counterparts

              • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yep, I meant U series, which (at least where I live) were covering vast majority of the market. There was occasional HQ here and there, but not that often. AMDs offerings at the time were mediocre and nobody really used them so for me, that era basically overlaps with Intel U series hegemony when speaking about laptop cpus.