Code analysis firm sees no major benefits from AI dev tool when measuring key programming metrics, though others report incremental gains from coding copilots with emphasis on code review.
Have fun generating your crap code that me or someone like me will come along later and delete and replace with more efficient code that’s a tenth of the line count and actually works because the company needs the bugs fixed.
There it is. It’s always about believing you are superior to the millions of devs whose code these tools are trained on. You’re obviously far superior to the rest of us. I was wrong, this isn’t about ego, it’s about objective fact!
Lol, it couldn’t determine the right amount of letters in the word strawberry using its training before. I’m not criticizing the training data. I’m criticizing a tool and its output.
It’s amusing to me that at first it’s “don’t blame the tool when it’s misused” and now it’s “the tool is smarter than any individual dev”. So which is it? Is it impossible to misuse this tool because it’s standing atop the shoulders of giants? Or is it something that has to be used with care and discretion and whose bad outputs can be blamed upon the individual coders who use it poorly?
That’s it. Don’t respond to the points and the obvious contradictions in your bad arguments only explicable by your personal hard on for the tool, just keep shit posting through it instead.
… feel free to remain within the ignorant point of view that if a tool is misusable, then it’s bad.
Have fun generating your crap code that me or someone like me will come along later and delete and replace with more efficient code that’s a tenth of the line count and actually works because the company needs the bugs fixed.
There it is. It’s always about believing you are superior to the millions of devs whose code these tools are trained on. You’re obviously far superior to the rest of us. I was wrong, this isn’t about ego, it’s about objective fact!
Lol, it couldn’t determine the right amount of letters in the word strawberry using its training before. I’m not criticizing the training data. I’m criticizing a tool and its output.
It’s amusing to me that at first it’s “don’t blame the tool when it’s misused” and now it’s “the tool is smarter than any individual dev”. So which is it? Is it impossible to misuse this tool because it’s standing atop the shoulders of giants? Or is it something that has to be used with care and discretion and whose bad outputs can be blamed upon the individual coders who use it poorly?
Gonna go cry myself to sleep now. I feel so inferior
That’s it. Don’t respond to the points and the obvious contradictions in your bad arguments only explicable by your personal hard on for the tool, just keep shit posting through it instead.