• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Have fun generating your crap code that me or someone like me will come along later and delete and replace with more efficient code that’s a tenth of the line count and actually works because the company needs the bugs fixed.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There it is. It’s always about believing you are superior to the millions of devs whose code these tools are trained on. You’re obviously far superior to the rest of us. I was wrong, this isn’t about ego, it’s about objective fact!

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Lol, it couldn’t determine the right amount of letters in the word strawberry using its training before. I’m not criticizing the training data. I’m criticizing a tool and its output.

        It’s amusing to me that at first it’s “don’t blame the tool when it’s misused” and now it’s “the tool is smarter than any individual dev”. So which is it? Is it impossible to misuse this tool because it’s standing atop the shoulders of giants? Or is it something that has to be used with care and discretion and whose bad outputs can be blamed upon the individual coders who use it poorly?

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s it. Don’t respond to the points and the obvious contradictions in your bad arguments only explicable by your personal hard on for the tool, just keep shit posting through it instead.