A U.S. Navy chief who wanted the internet so she and other enlisted officers could scroll social media, check sports scores and watch movies while deployed had an unauthorized Starlink satellite dish installed on a warship and lied to her commanding officer to keep it secret, according to investigators.

Internet access is restricted while a ship is underway to maintain bandwidth for military operations and to protect against cybersecurity threats.

The Navy quietly relieved Grisel Marrero, a command senior chief of the littoral combat ship USS Manchester, in August or September 2023, and released information on parts of the investigation this week.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ship officers heard the scuttlebutt about STINKY, of course, and they began asking questions and doing inspections, but they never found the concealed device. On August 18, though, a civilian worker from the Naval Information Warfare Center was installing an authorized SpaceX “Starshield” device and came across the unauthorized SpaceX device hidden on the weatherdeck.

    Heh.

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why the F were they broadcasting the SSID on a “secret” wifi network? That’s just asking to get caught. If they had hidden the SSID most people would never have known about it.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Extra fun is that the head chief never gave anyone else the password. She logged into each of the other chiefs devices.

        She could have 100% also typed in the ssid at the time. It would have taken almost no extra effort.

        • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can view WiFi passwords for saved networks on pretty much every OS. There’s no reason to be secretive about entering WiFi passwords, at least to the people whose devices you’re entering the password on.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Indeed, I can share it from my phone via QR or just see the password plain.

            • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              You think someone stupid enough to make all the above mistakes would be savvy enough to build PKI and a RADIUS server? You’re giving her too much credit.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can still see a WiFi network (and tell that it is unique from others) even when it’s not broadcasting SSID. It’s just one less piece of information available when someone is trying to access it.

        Security through obscurity isn’t security, but it’ll keep neighborhood kids from trying to guess the password from across the street. On a warship? They’d have still seen it.

        • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes but not as blatant as STINKY

          Everyone with a smartphone would see STINKY and immediately get suspicious, while only techs would have noticed the hidden network and investigated on that

        • kalleboo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          On a warship? They’d have still seen it.

          It took 6 months to discover, and even then it was by techs who went to physically install different hardware saw the dish hardware mounted to the ship. That’s the real WTF here, how do these ships not have some kind of passive RF scanning/rogue AP detection??

          It was seen by regular enlisted people who saw the network on their phones and left comment sheets asking WTF it was, but the person in question snatched up the papers before they got to the officers. If they had hidden the SSID, nobody would have seen it because nobody scans for hidden SSIDs on their phones.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re expecting intelligence and competence from these people? The ones who thought it would be a good idea to violate a half dozen regulations to even install it in the first place?

        • Subverb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Supposedly she was an information and IT specialist… Setting the thing up to not broadcast its SSID should have been one of the first things they thought of. But probably she didn’t know it could be done, which again speaks to her overall incompetence.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, they all have drinking fountains. Absolutely no one at all calls them scuttlebutts though.

        • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Scuttlebutt in this case refers to gossip, which is also why the water fountains are called scuttlebutt - people would gossip around them

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The commentator asked if ships had “a scuttlebutt” anymore. Im well aware it’s the term for gossip, but since gossip isn’t an object, I assumed they asking about the drinking fountains.

            Ships do still have them.

            • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh I’m not trying to correct you I just have less than 0 social awareness and saw a word with a funny history so I shared my knowledge on it lol

              • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                No problem mate. Text can be a bit opaque at times, but it’s still a joy to be able to talk to so many people about so many things.

          • teft@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Other way round. Scuttlebutt was the name for the casks of freshwater and then for the fountain. Sometime between those two eras it came to be the word for gossip because of the association with gossip being told around the scuttlebutt.