• auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    https://www.sir.advancedleadership.harvard.edu/articles/who-was-responsible-for-january-6th

    Yep, how about from Harvard law school. It was incitement, and lots of people were injured. YES, he’s dangerous.

    He doesn’t need to hold a knife to be dangerous. Many dictators and mob bosses work using threats and lackies to do their work.

    And I’ve been threatened at least 3x in my life.

    • Twice was "don’t you ever XXXX ever again, or else… " << Yes, thats a threat…
    • The third time was a angry boyfriend (meth head) telling my long term ex (who I hadn’t seen in ages anyway), that he knew where I lived. I once found a fence post nailed to the tree outside my house, and I suspect it was him

    I also intervened when a junkie held up a pipe threatening to hit someone in a road rage incident.

    In all 4 of these cases, people like yourself will claim that they weren’t dangerous simply because they don’t directly say they’re going to harm the other person. But they were obviously intended to have life-threatening undertones which any reasonable person would back down from. No, it’s threats and intimidation.

    Trump regularly highlights judges families and such, and it has the same intention

    Again, he has absolutely been upfront that next election he’s trying to change things to extend his term and become a dictator, and he will only extend power to people who follow him.

    Mob bosses will always be careful what they say. Even if you watch him speak, it feels like he’s an actor in the untouchables