I never said people should “agree to disagree”, and people should debate opinions they think are bad. A good debate can show strengths and weaknesses of arguments.
People have tried this for ages. It has not worked. These bigots are not debating in good faith. The only response is the verbal or legal equivalent of bapping them on the nose with a newspaper and going, “NO! BAD!”
Debate does not work if they are not arguing in good faith
In a healthy society people can have different opinions.
The differing opinion being that a group of people shouldn’t exist?
Yeah, totally. That sounds like a healthy society to me!
Go fuck yourself.
In a healthy society people have the critical thinking skills you lack.
I never said people should “agree to disagree”, and people should debate opinions they think are bad. A good debate can show strengths and weaknesses of arguments.
People have tried this for ages. It has not worked. These bigots are not debating in good faith. The only response is the verbal or legal equivalent of bapping them on the nose with a newspaper and going, “NO! BAD!”
Debate does not work if they are not arguing in good faith
When your differing opinion threatens a whole group of people it has no place in a healthy society.
Why aren’t people more tolerant of Nazi beliefs?