sircac

…at the moment

The wrong migration to IMHO…

Well, when the loop takes place there is a travel in time taking place… but not as in the standard time travel films.

I think is important to point out that in the Groundhog time loops the travel is only of the memories or the information, there is no energy-mass traveling (though information is a kind of energy, let me skip physics here), and the traveler at the beginning of the loop has not carried anything from the future but the memories of the previous loop, did not age or suffered physical modifications (there may be exceptions, sure).

So I think that is a kind of time travel, but a sub-genre where the travel is less material than in the typical time travels.

Ma cuanto mi manca Italia…

I cannot avoid to be pedantic on this, it is recharged during half the trip… it just does not require plug-like recharging

I don’t care, I just want a nice place to wander, nothing is forever, but the longer, the better, regardless of popularity

“To shoehorn something” is a literal common expression in Spanish, lately often used to indicate a deliberated misdirection of a debate into a different argument at the minimum occasion (usually via any fallacy)… and there are even shoehorns literally with long sticks for the elders…

Without tracking: https://youtube.com/shorts/ZYDC097mPPw

https://youtu.be/Ma8ShBFyE3g

I just needed to share this summary of her best moments…

Current reddit is not like “reddit” anymore for a while… nothing is forever

The importance of basic research…

…and looping on the same phrase 3 times and still not being able to realise of what you just read

For USA (and most of western countries) I have the prejudice that are effective plutocracies (where wealth is not only liquid money in the bank) disguised of democracies, the more is only dual the polarisation the higher the control of the wealthy

They predict, not reason…

A 2 party system is half away from fascism where one only party exists…

Gaaaarikuuuu Toooosutoooo

.

Miiiiiikurooooo-waaaaaafuuuuuu

.

Ooooooofueeen de kimashitaaaaaa

.

.

Gariku tosuto

Mikurowafu

Gariku Toooosutoooo ofuen

.

Ofuen wa

Moeru to

Atsui kaaaaazeeee fuuukuuuu

.

Kogeta wa

Gariku wo

Moeru gaaaariiiiiikuuuu yooooo

…

[Alternative beginning of “O Fortuna” from “Carmina Burana” for apocalyptic burning garlic toast contemplation]

:.|:;

:.|:; HOLY SHIT

Not from that field, and I think it depends a lot of the field, country, etc, but research is not an idilic world at all and deal with huge flaws from the real world, institutions, society and economics, not aside of human being’s flaws, so it can be deeply disappointing in some aspects. I believe is a natural in any guild (there is shit everywhere, e.g. police require internal affairs for a good reason, but not only, they suffer from funding restrictions, metrics for promotion, etc, and the same can be said for medicine, politics, etc) so in the end it may be your ability to deal with real world shit… and luck.

I think that in average is lack of empathy or just lack of interest in the listener, i.e. the speaker just wants to speak out a speech, not to effectively communicate something: if I want to share something with someone I cannot avoid to rely on the listener’s feedback to guide my speech, regardless of the specialisation level of the topic.