The plot foldens…

Loneskum

Not any guy, our very own Didier Raoult. Unethical, gross, money hoarding, conspirationist and overall public danger Didier Raoult.

Oh my dear Baruch, what did they do to you…

Ah yes, I often shit while I shit.

I’m 40 and I think with the strongest faith people who say this kind of things are an absolute toxin.

As a guy whose name is, in his native language, literally something like “Ghristmas”, I thank you in the name of all December 24th until the end of times.

As a cis male, I find this post to be so true. And you’re never done trying to unfold this socialization.

Indeed, that makes sense

Ah, yes, that’s also true. Thanks!

Yeah but… isn’t it weird that they share their tools then?

I’m not into conspiracy stuff. It’s just that when I downloaded Ghidra for the first time, when I saw it was being published by the NSA, I had a “wow, didn’t expect that” reaction and it somehow became a shower thought.

It may be important to say that I’m not from the US. Where I live, I’m not sure things like that would happen or have happened. Well, or it did and I didn’t really pay attention.

Failed copy/paste

Cuddles maybe. Some homeless people care about their cats more than their own life. The nerve some people have to rob them of their cats… I’ve seen it happen recently. I knew the guy, called him. He recognized his cat. The young couple said the cat would be better off with them than with a hobo. Needless to say, we “retrieved” the cat.

So no Miku, don’t do that.

It’s absolutely not legal Miku. Please all of you don’t do that.

You could have stopped at (universal) servitude. But yeah, they say it all becomes clear p.72!

By pushing the idea that the humain brain is capable of “free” decision making to adapt to its environment without being forced by external factors it seemed to me that it implied an exception, or, otherwise, you’d be forced to extend that hypothesis to all living beings, and causality would surely take offense ?

I’m answering, but I see what you mean, and I generally agree with it. I just tend to think the idea of free orientation/action is both dangerous and the reason of a lot of human suffering. I’m also a compatabilist, but I another way I suppose.

One cauld rightfully argue “determination” and “predetermination” are wildly different concepts. The comic is wrong on this. But let’s go page 72 anyway

I propose to sincerely rebute this conception which I always found lacking. And if we’re to rely on facts and facts only, I’ll say its internal decision are themselves absolutely determined by several factors, most if not all of them being determined causally.

In that sense, it is imo both the more scientific and logical, but also eliminates vague and speculative concepts like “free(dom)” and “free will”, which would somehow escape universal determinism, hence creating a special case in the laws of causality for humanity only.

Thanks for sharing, I like this one!

That’s very true, yes. And non-inherent hardly means “weak” or “inefficient”.