• 1 Post
  • 34 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle
  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uktoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldHelp me harden my home server
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago
    1. Sure but there’s no reason to openly advertise that yours has open services behind it.
    2. Absolutely. There are countries that I’m never going to travel there so why would I need to allow access to my stuff from there? If you think it’s nonsense then don’t use it, but you do you and I’ll do me.
    3. See point 3.

    We all need to decide for ourselves what we’re comfortable with and what we’re not and then implement appropriate measures to suit. I’m not sure why you’re arguing with me over how I setup my own services for my own use.


  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uktoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldHelp me harden my home server
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yes and no? It’s not quite as black and white as that though. Yes, they can technically decrypt anything that’s been encrypted with a cert that they’ve issued. But they can’t see through any additional encryption layers applied to that traffic (eg. encrypted password vault blobs) or see any traffic on your LAN that’s not specifically passing through the tunnel to or from the outside.

    Cloudflare is a massive CDN provider, trusted to do exactly this sort of thing with the private data of equally massive companies, and they’re compliant with GDPR and other such regulations. Ultimately, the likelihood that they give the slightest jot about what passes through your tunnel as an individual user is minute, but whether you’re comfortable with them handling your data is something only you can decide.

    There’s a decent question and answer about the same thing here: https://community.cloudflare.com/t/what-data-does-cloudflare-actually-see/28660


  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uktoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldHelp me harden my home server
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Admittedly I’m paranoid, but I’d be looking to:

    1. Isolate your personal data from any web facing servers as much as possible. I break my own rule here with Immich, but I also…
    2. Use a Cloudflare tunnel instead of opening ports on your router directly. This gets your IP address out of public record.
    3. Use Cloudflare’s WAF features to limit ingress to trusted countries at a minimum.
    4. If you can get your head around it, lock things down more with features like Cloudflare device authentication.
    5. Especially if you don’t do step 4: Integrate Crowdsec into your Nginx setup to block probes, known bot IPs, and common attack vectors.

    All of the above is free, but past step 2 can be difficult to setup. The peace of mind once it is, however, is worth it to me.









  • Synology has Container Manager, which is their GUI frontend for Docker, so if it’ll run in Docker it’ll run on a Syno NAS. I’m running Pihole on mine just fine.

    As for the M.2 drives, you can use non-Synology ones as storage. Don’t quote me on it but I’ve a feeling it “just works” in the EU where they’re not allowed to force you to use specific brands, but if it doesn’t then there’s a script that removes the restriction: https://github.com/007revad/Synology_enable_M2_volume

    You should check their repo as they have other useful scripts. I’m using the one that enables dedupe on non-SSD volumes myself.





  • I’m using plenty of containers, accelerated and otherwise, but I also want a full-blown desktop that I can access from wherever. Even on a wired LAN, streaming that desktop is slow and laggy when it’s hosted on my NAS, which I think is due to the lack of hardware acceleration on that system. I want to move the VM to a host that has that feature (currently running Ubuntu Server) but I need a hypervisor that doesn’t require its own desktop system to be installed in order to manage it.

    Plenty of good replies here to help me though.





  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uktoMemes@lemmy.mlI hate these icons
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    you’re absolutely making things up

    I could tell you what I see but you wouldn’t believe me anyway.

    I was trying to show that not everyone perceives the world around them in the same way, and most people find it fascinating when they take a step back to really think about it. But you’ve already decided that simply not being able to see colors in the same way as you makes me inherently wrong, so I’m not going to engage any further.


  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uktoMemes@lemmy.mlI hate these icons
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yes I understand the meme and I’m not trying to get into an argument. I’m just trying to educate as to why relying on color as the primary differentiator is not a solution to the problem as proposed.

    at a glance, color is a much faster tool we use to identify these icons

    Think about what you’re saying here, and consider how ridiculous it would sound if you said that to someone who was completely blind.

    Sure, to a “color normal” person, something’s color is a great differentiator, but even when using a colorblind friendly pallette it’s just far easier for us to distinguish different shapes than colors. We’ve spent our whole lives adapting to a lack of color information so asking us to be able to work purely on color alone is like asking a blind person to see.

    Again, and this part is really important and oft overlooked - this applies even when a designer has gone out of their way to choose a colorblind friendly pallette. It’s just not that easy for us. I honestly couldn’t even tell you what Google’s corporate pallette is without looking and I’m sure that information is second nature to normies.


  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uktoMemes@lemmy.mlI hate these icons
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nope. The icons are honestly good enough as they are, but the original post was being disingenuous in suggesting they’re no more distinguishable than squares.

    Running with that logic, having each square a different color does not solve the problem for those of us who can’t easily distinguish those colors.