Follow me on Pixelfed to see more: https://pixelfed.social/Monstrosity

  • 13 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 27th, 2024

help-circle




  • Well said.

    I’d like to add that the biggest problem, imo, is the closed source nature of the models. Corporations who used our collective knowledge, without permission, to create AI to sell back to us is unethical at best. All AI models should be open source for public access, sort of like libraries. Corpos are thrilled we’re fighting about copyright pennies instead, I’m sure.


  • Monstrosity@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneRule of owning
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    No it’s not. It’s well established law that we are allowed to resell our physical media. You’re just wrong. Like I said, if it were up to corporate media lawyers, you would be correct, which is why it’s frustrating to see people like OP & yourself falling into line when no one’s even asking you to. Stop that.


  • Monstrosity@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneRule of owning
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    According to media lawyers, maybe. But when I have a CD of music, or a game cartridge, I can sell it to someone else. For money. Because it’s my copy I’m selling. So, what the fuck are you talking about except ceding the point to corporate lawyers for no good reason?







  • Monstrosity@lemm.eetoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldGrind or something
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You’re blaming the wrong people. Being sensitive of triggers is a good thing, advertisers are the problem.

    If you look into the history of radio & television, you’ll see the same pattern. Like the interne, at first, they were an awesome medium anyone could use and all kinds of badass stuff happened. Over time, everything became consolidated & advertisers insisted on censoring for maximum efficiency.