Let them focus on the streaming sites that are a dime a dozen than go for the main sites

They can state all they want, if their clients don’t pay for it they’d sell their firstborn son to get the numbers back up

But not the options in them. Look at the first screenshot, the options available and their position on screen are identical to a T, “add to favourites”, “download”, more options next to the album art, followed by a play and shuffle button, followed by the playlist, followed by 3 tabs, a home, search/explore, and my music tab. This isn’t just “card with heading and options next to it” close

Idk the layout and available options in the first few screens are way too close, this isn’t just stylistic similarity

Then pay for a streaming service or buy Blu-rays. You’re paying either way, the methods above are just paying with your time

Sadly as many times as needed, complacency is how these companies get “loyal customers” who are willing to put up with bs

Watch Amazon sue them or something lmao

Well who knows, they do offer AI summaries now so they’re at least using the data for something,who says they won’t use it for other things in the future

Because now you’re using discord for more things? You’re giving them more data? What’s not to like

Oh I agree, it’s very much a “forcing a round peg into a square hole” situation, but I doubt discord will make any changes to push back against it

Because a lot of people go to discord servers to access existing information?

I saw this when I was confused how SAMURAI, the fake band from cyberpunk, suddenly got a new album release, and yet it didn’t sound anything like the rest of their songs

Ecosystems and collaboration. If you’re already using Adobe for X and Y in your teams, it’s cheaper to get a CC license; and as for collaboration Adobe files are proprietary (and tbh so are Affinity files) so it’s harder to transition off of them. You can open .psd files in affinity, but wanting to export one will rasterize your text. And you can’t even export a .ai file, sure you can do pdfs and that preserves vector information and layers, but that’s just friction that businesses wouldn’t want to deal with.

They cannot change the terms of a license without reserving themselves the right to do so which would be a red flag, this is in reference to future sales of the license for this software.

Even if the UK is not in the EU the GDPR still applies there, just the version it got while it was in the EU tho, no revisions

Mindset switch to not thinking of that communication as email. At least at my work place it took a while for people to not be overly formal and just go straight to the point, which slows things down. It’s meant to be an instant communication channel after all

I don’t think it’s a system issue, it’s more of a people issue, a lot of people are still using things like teams and slack as if they’re email which bottlenecks everyone, but with the correct training and mindset switch it can be very efficient.

You can get a radio playlist of most songs I believe, it’s a context option, unless you mean a different type of radio playlist, but the feature I mentioned has satisfied that need for me

Well maybe not on paper but they did leverage it a lot when questioned

I’m confused, how can a company that’s gained numerous advantages from being non-profit just switch to a for-profit model? Weren’t a lot of the advantages (like access to data and scraping) given with the stipulation that it’s for a non-profit? This sounds like it should be illegal to my brain