Greed for the future baby
It’s interesting that the media sites that historically steered clear of economics are starting to talk about it (this is not a new revelation)
I was gonna make a sarcastic comment on how surprised I was that a 5$ subscription is not enough for something so heavy that it requires building new nuclear plants.
But holly shit, ChatGPT+ is 23€/months.
good, everyone flood the AI with useless tasks so they go bankrupt
You mean Clippy++ 2.0 auto-complete with jpgs isn’t a business model?
Man I cannot fucking wait until this stupid goddamn bubble pops
Me too. I can then go back to 3D printing quantum blockchains out of room temperature superconductors in my private space station with Katy Perry.
I find that hard to believe right up until the point you mentioned Katy.
If she’s good enough for Justin, she’s good enough for me.
Im so tired of this stupud fucking refrain. Cause we all know how housing got so mich better after 08 and how we dont have any more dot coms and how the internet got so much better since that bubble. You people have no idea what your even asking for.
The problem is that when a bubble pops and exposes the problem, the government leaders should take the opportunity to fix the problem so it doesn’t happen again.
Instead they bail them all out, so there are not only no consequences to their actions, they are literally rewarded with unimaginable wealth. What about this strategy would induce them to change their ways, over doing it all over again, and getting rewarded again?
the bubble pops and then everything comes back, in an “improved” version. Imagine: ChatGPT with ads and sponsored answers.
Just like that one black mirror episode.
And what happens when a bubble bursts? Did the internet die when the dotcom bubble burst, or is that just when it really started to get going?
I share most of your sentiments against AI, but a bubble popping won’t make it go away, and it won’t even rectify it to be more to people’s likings (i doubt it). It takes more than just waiting around to accomplish that.
Basically, the only reason some of these vaguely functional AI tools actually work okay is because they haven’t been ruined with inevitable monetisation yet.
Already the cost is quite high. A prolific year can easily burn 100usd a day in tokens and they have not even started to enshitify.
Some of the cost to run these models will come down a bit if Nvidia gets some actual competition which I’m sure will happen in the medium to long term because the hyper scalers definitely don’t like paying Nvidia’s AI ransom and the Chinese don’t want to be beholden to a company the US can influence.
We will see which happens first.
Yes, this is part of the business model. The goal is to get everyone addicted to their service, then jack the price up to profitable margins. It’s the same model Netflix and Amazon used. Bothe services lost money for over 10 years before becoming profitable.
Venture capitalism is what it’s called, I think
It is not venture capitalism. Though it is fueled by venture capitalism. I am describing the type of car and you are calling it gasoline. They’re most distinctly not the same thing.
However it should be noted there both a part of the same corrosion of our society. Just how automobiles that run on gasoline are a corrosion on our atmosphere.
Venture capitalism is when you give somebody money to start a business in hopes that they make it big, giving you really valuable equity for relatively little money. What you’re thinking of is blitzscaling. Scale up in an unsustainable way in order to gain market dominance, so that you can use that to become profitable.
Caveat: this applies to literally every new technology especially in the VC funded world.
So much of the AI stuff we see today are boards reacting and worrying about being “left behind” in AI. In many cases, the goal is not to deliver value. The goal is to be able to attach a little sticker that says “AI” to their products to excite the shareholders.
Unfortunately in this case, some of the largest companies in the world haven’t been able to figure out how to run AI services at a profit.
This could change any day if some more efficient hardware arrives, but until then, most of the software world is just crossing their fingers it becomes profitable one day while they light dollar bills on fire in their datacenters.
If this isn’t “bubbleish” behavior I don’t know what is.
I was in a local bike store looking at red tail lights yesterday.
One brand Lezyne had several versions. There was an “AI Alert” one. I looked it up and it just has a sensor to detect when you brake and it changes to a different flashing mode at that time.
Thats barely even “smart” let alone “AI”.
The stupid thing is, because of this dumb claim they needed to confirm that it doesn’t collect and transmit any data about your riding habits. Its a light with no connectivity other than a charging port.
The dumbfuckery is astonishing.
This is the thing I don’t understand about businesses like Cursor. They take two other companies products (Claude and VS Code) and smash them together and sell the result at a loss. How is that much of a business when basically what you’ve got is something that could have been a VsCode plugin.
It’s something that literally exists as a first-party plugin for VSCode. The Copilot Chat extension has an Agent mode for vibe coding for half the price of Cursor.
Cursor has cursor agent.
Copilot has Copilot coding agent too (as distinct from Agent mode in Copilot Chat. Yes, they’re different things and yes, I had to look up what the difference was)
Is copilot agent consume based or flat priced?
if valley had fresh ideas for profitable business, they wouldn’t go full into ai in the first place. lol
You disrupt the market and wait until someone buy you out for huge woads of cash
Now I’m suddenly tempted to start using it. or at least coming up with a bot to keep it busy.
Holy crap, has anyone ever attempted to create an “AI fork bomb”? Go to one of these agent bots, and tell it to create accounts with the other agent code bots. These new accounts will all be told to create accounts on all the other code bots services. And do this recursively forever. So the flow would be 1 bot makes lets say 5 bots. Each of those 5 bots make 5 more bots. And each of those 5 bots make 5 more. So the total number of running bots becomes like 1 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5…
Obligatory, this is purely hypothetical, and you should never do this for legal reasons.
Sounds like a great idea, although no, commoners are not given the same privileges as capitalists. So I’m afraid there will be problems indeed.
Good. Costs is the key point to get rid of it.
AI reminds me of how nuclear fusion has been around for decades, and you would read the occasional article about some small advancement and it always seemed to be 10 years away and then suddenly they are building a power plant somewhere when it doesn’t even work yet.
Sure, we’re losing energy with every He atom we fuse, but we make up for it in volume!
first truly positive use for ai
