• uis@lemm.eeEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      By claiming that everyone who do not trust is communist trumpist

    • John Richard@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      Simply, you can’t. I’m personally all for an open source alternative for electronic voting. I can bank online, but not vote online. I’d trust an open source online voting platform more than I’d trust poll workers to not skew some votes. I’d also like to be able to track my vote and ensure it was cast for the person I voted for.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        2 months ago

        you can’t have secret ballot and have a secure, auditible online vote. One of the problems of social media is it has created enemy lists for authoritarian states.

        • milicent_bystandr@lemm.eeEnglish
          0·
          2 months ago

          You kind of can. Depends how fully auditable you want, but you can have cryptographically anonymized entries, that (I believe?) could even allow the original voter to track their vote, without enabling anyone else to track the vote back to the voter.

          It’s a different project, but GNU Taler have some interesting work on anonymized but not forgeable money transactions.

      • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
        0·
        2 months ago

        Banking is completely different from voting from a security point of view. None of the parties in a bank transaction are anonymous, and there are numerous ways to retry or roll back a transaction. Computerized voting is more like crypto currency. 😝

      • uis@lemm.eeEnglish
        0·
        2 months ago

        Biggest vulnreability for online voting stands behind voter

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      2 months ago

      I think we’re well past the open/closed discussion when hackers have repeatedly shown how easy it is to compromise the voting machines.

      We know they’re trash, it’s not theory.