Actual poster from 1917 that made me laugh. A lot.

Also, those motherfuckers are measuring the weight of those balls in kilograms, aren’t they?

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t think anyone believes the current system to be better, rather too much of a pain to replace. Americans really dislike learning and being inconvenienced.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I don’t think anyone believes the current system to be better,

      Check our ShitAmericansSay (on Reddit, ew) and you’ll find plenty who argue that metric is worse.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Metric is undoubtedly an improvement, and if there were political will, I’d be all for a renewed push to make it the sole standard. Cultural inertia within a single large and wealthy country is pretty much the only “advantage” the older “system” has over metric.

        I do get a little bit protective when people suggest that Imperial/Customary/whatever is nonsensical or useless, though. It’s more that it’s disjoint and obsolete. Units arise out of circumstances, and shit like using 12 inches to a foot makes a lot of division into fractions really easy. Same with 8 ounces to a cup, 16 to a pint, and so on. Dividing shit in half or thirds is a pretty easy paradigm to do math in your head if you’re not really getting a lot of formal education. Most of the base units ultimately trace back to something perfectly sensible for a pre-industrial society.

        So there’s method to the madness, it’s just that it was a thousand different methods, arising from various trades and merchants trying to standardize (yet also retain) their traditional measurements for their own needs. There’s not the grand unified system that only really became workable with standardized manufacturing and improved communication in the 19th century.

        The other funny thing is that while units can and do still cause confusion, many US Customary units are literally defined in terms of SI and have been for well over a hundred years. An inch, for example, is exactly 2.54 cm, because even in the 1890s Americans knew it was stupid to try match a metal stick in London to one in Washington to one in Paris with any greater precision than that, and only the SI had a set process to refine unit definitions in relationship to natural phenomena.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Although, to be fair, British people say that too, especially when Britain joined the EU. “You mean I have to stop measuring the produce I sell in pounds and ounces?!”

        And, of course, they still use MPH. I imagine there would be a massive uproar if that got changed.

        British have gone much further with metrification than the U.S. but there’s still way too much resistance. And some of it is very silly indeed- weighing yourself in stone, which is a rather arbitrary 14 pounds.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      All I can say is that the metric system was predominantly taught in my American school experience, with US units mainly limited to math class. The only thing that sucked about using metric in science class is the short unit we had where we needed to convert measurements between metric and US, which I think was arguably the point.

      It’s corporations, really, that seem to insist on having their products and tools still defaulting to US customary units, and I can’t fathom why. Even when you go abroad and try to buy a TV, they’re all still labeled in inches, which boggles my mind.

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I doubt the corporations care in any deep way, same as with anything else. It’s just sort of a chicken and egg thing. They’ll resist change as long as resisting is cost-effective, but that very resistance slows adoption. Still, they will likely shrug and adapt if it becomes obvious that people prefer metric, or even simply stop caring.

        • hime0321@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Probably depends on state. I went to high school in Washington state, just about a decade ago, and we were taught SI units in most science classes. Unit conversion was almost always one of the first lessons we had. Chemistry specifically made us learn sig figs, which is much easier to use with SI units, and made me wish we used them everywhere.

          • folekaule@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s probably what it is. I didn’t go to school in the US but my kids went to school in Ohio and my impression was that metric was not the primary system of units used in education, though it was taught.

            The argument I hear most often from people defending the US customary units is that the units are more intuitive. For example, an inch is about the size of a thumb, or 0 degrees is fucking cold and 100 is fucking hot.

            On the whole, people seem receptive to metric, but don’t want the hassle or cost to convert. They seem content to use metric where it’s important (science, military) and keep the old ways elsewhere.

            I currently with in healthcare research and almost everything not patient facing is done in metric, but there are still conversions going on everywhere, leading to data problems that are hard to correct later. People used to thinking in ounces putting those where grams were supposed to go, and so on.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s corporations, really, that seem to insist on having their products and tools still defaulting to US customary units…

        I am no corporate fan, but this one is not on them. They already sell the same products in metric everywhere else. If the US switched to metric, most corporations would be able to switch overnight.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Not likey, the production lines used to service other countries are probably not the same used to supply the US.

          New equipment would have to be obtained, new processes developed based on differences with regional suppliers, different regulatory standards on the production process would have to be adhered to, and they’d lose out on the generations of compatibility with older standards that they are intent keeping as cost saving measures.

          Overnight is a stretch, but could they switch given enough time? Almost certainly. But it’s a major unnecessary expense that doesn’t immediately benefit shareholders.

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Americans really dislike learning and being inconvenienced.

      it’s worse than that-- we have gallons of milk, but liters of soda. we drive in mph, but run in 5K. science and medicine weights are grams, but recipes call for ounces. want to fix an american car–hope you have both metric and “standard” wrenches

      more like we’d rather stay with the stupidness and inconvenience we know rather than change anything, no matter how much better it would be

      • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        We are used to 2 liter bottles, so we still use them. We run 5ks because its been a standard distance to run for a long time. Other countries also do similar things, old habits die hard.

        We use metric for science and medicine because the benefits of metric are much more pronounced for those use cases.

        Honestly, using both really isnt that hard. Its only really an inconvenience if you aren’t already used to it. We aren’t changing it because we’re getting along just fine the way things are, and there are much bigger problems to be solved.

        • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          for one thing, there will always be “bigger problems to solve,” just like with getting rid of DST, which also needs to fucking die a horrible death already

          for another thing, thank you for providing a perfect example of my last sentence

          • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            American are willing to change things, we just pick what to change, and we aren’t being inconvenienced by this nearly enough to change it.

            • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              thank you, again, for illustrating my point. again. care to say the same thing a third time? for the people who just aren’t getting it?

              • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                By continuing to act like this you are preventing any actual conversation from taking place. You might as well just say “you’re wrong, no I will not elaborate”. If you’re not interested in having a conversation then don’t respond, no one is forcing you to do this.

                If you would like to have a less sarcastic and rude discussion, I’ll be here.

                • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  i made a point:

                  more like we’d rather stay with the stupidness and inconvenience we know rather than change anything, no matter how much better it would be

                  and you’re agreeing with it. repeatedly. though i don’t know what you think the “debate” here is. are you trying to get me to agree with “no, we shouldn’t change to metric”? because that’s not going to happen. but you can keep trying if that makes you feel better

                  • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    I don’t care that you think we should switch to metric, you said that Americans aren’t switching purely because they hate change, and they don’t care about the potential benefits just because they hate change so damn much. This is what I’ve been arguing against. I honestly have no idea how you could have read all of that and come to the conclusion I’m arguing against the metric system. Every word of it is about why Americans don’t think the switch is worth it.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        want to fix an american car–hope you have both metric and “standard” wrenches

        I will point out that with the singular and shining exception of lugnuts, at least this one has not been the case since at least the 1970’s. All fasteners on current(ish) American cars are metric nowadays and have been for quite some time. I’ve never seen a single one that isn’t on any car that’s not old enough to qualify for historic plates.

        This used to piss off the oldheads to no end back when I managed a hardware store because they would absolutely insist, sometimes literally screaming in my face about it, that their dang old good old boy red blooded American Ford that they just bought didn’t have no Jap pinko metric bolts in it anywhere not nohow, and 100% of the time they were wrong. (This annoyed me only slightly less than the people who showed up needing a bolt, didn’t know what it was, didn’t bring the old one with them, and the only information they had was “I took it off with a 9/16 wrench.” Hombre, the head size tells me absolutely nothing about the diameter, thread pitch, or length. Then they would claim that it’s just a “standard” bolt, as if there’s any such thing. Also, a 9/16" wrench will usually fairly easily remove a bolt with a 14mm head, so that really tells me nothing. Or 5/8" on 16mm. Etc.)

        Harleys, however, take it as some kind of point of pride that they actually do use fractional inch fasteners everywhere.

        • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          didn’t know what it was, didn’t bring the old one with them, and the only information they had was

          LOL the library equivalent is “i’m looking for a book but don’t remember the title or author, but it was about a woman who fell in love, and it had a red cover!” which describes a not-insignificant percentage of all books in existence

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The differential bolts on my ford 8.8" are 1/2". Also the lower intake manifold bolts on a gm 3.8l were 3/8" even though everything else was metric. I’m sure there’s also oil drain plugs that are not metric.

    • hime0321@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Except that it has been replaced, or is not the preferred unit for trade and commerce. The SI has been the “preferred system of weights and measures for United States trade and commerce” since 1975 according to United States law. Too bad most other Americans are too scared of change to use it everywhere else.

    • randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Inconvenienced might be right. The tagline from the poster treats metric implementation as a punishment. “What has he done to deserve this?” Has the same victimized tone like, “Look what they done to my boy” which completely disregards the merits of either system in favor of nationalism. It almost seems like a cold-war era ideal.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Start with adding a few metric characteristics in imperial. A yard and a meter are pretty close, so call it a kilo yard and centi yard. Same for quart and liter. It’s not switching to metric, but it’s more logical.

    • slickgoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Australia joined the metric system on the 14th February 1966. It took about two weeks before it was running trouble free. Everything changed, including currency, on a single day. The system is pretty easy.

      • dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        True! We used to use pounds, shillings, pence as our currency and I’m very glad I never needed to deal with that shit.

    • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It has nothing to do with disliking learning. Trying to learn and use a system of measurement without being immersed in it is really hard. For years, I’ve set all my temperature measurements on my phone and thermometers to Celsius, but because I’m surrounded by people and systems that don’t use metric, I have to convert back and forth between the two. It’s a lot of mental effort for basically no gain.

      Every day, customary speed and distance units and my intuitive understanding of them are reinforced when driving and seeing street signs. I know how long a kilometer is, but if you say “My brother lives 45 kilometers away”, I’d have a difficult time truly understanding that. I wouldn’t be able to estimate how long it would take to drive there, for example.

      Another issue is cost. In my job, it would take weeks or months to update all of the documentation and code to metric. Then customers would have to approve of all those changes. A whole bunch of machinery still uses customary units too, so they would have to be replaced or updated.

      I say all of this as a metric lover and evangelist. It’s not trivial to convert an entire massive country to metric. Countries that have converted already should be hugely proud of themselves for accomplishing a difficult task.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Doesn’t need to be instant.

        You can have a year or two where both metrics are given side to side on products, weather,…

        Even road signs can just slowly update by hanging the new signs next to the old ones for a while, until the old ones are removed.

        It is about disliking learning and the need to be contrary to the rest of the world.

          • observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think younger people in Canada only know °F if their thermostat is set to it and they can’t or don’t bother to change. My stupid fridge is in Fahrenheit and that can’t be changed (even though the handbook shows the display in Celsius! A variation of the model is probably sold abroad).

            I think Canada properly adopted Celsius, kilometres, litres and millilitres (at least here in Toronto), but all other metric units are the underdog. Even CBC, that is probably the only media outlet that tries to stick to metric will specify people’s height in feet and inches. Shameful.

            • ebc@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Canadian here. It really depends on if it’s a cultural use or something the government might have an influence on through legislation. They can force industries to label packages in metric, but they can’t force grandma to change her manually-transcribed recipes. The other big influence is obviously our neighbours to the south. A lot of industries haven’t switched over there, and we get their products. Main culprit here would be the construction industry, lumber and hardware is all in US customary units and I hate it.