• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    And how kind of you to share that with us here. On Lemmy. That skews older.

    (sad) lmao

          • grillgamesh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            were it not so sad… that’d be impressive…

            nrmally tinnitus is a constant sine wave right? I’m lucky that mine is only audible at a noise floor of “super quiet” (my dB meter crapped out on me a while back and I’ve not had the money to replace it sadly)

            • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              Good news is that if dial-up tinnitus is real, my other comment was only plausible by lucky coincidence. Got a little of the standard variety like what you’re talking about (just enough to make me care about good PPE moving forward) and thought it’d be an interesting consequence of tech exposure for old geeks.

            • brachypelmasmithi@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              can confirm that it’s a constant sine wave, at least for me.

              i blew myself up by accident a month ago, and while my left ear has fully recovered my right one wasn’t so lucky. lost all hearing above like 10kHz (which isnt really noticeable, especially with my left ear still being good on frequencies), and i also now have some very minor tinnitus there. ironically if i had to guesstimate the frequency of my tinnitus it would be around 12 kHz, which is past my hearing range, though it can change briefly because of external stimuli.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I finally was able to readjust my brain into believing 1995 was longer than 10 years ago. I’m now convinced it was 20 years ago.

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Funny how time works.

        • 1995 was ten years ago.
        • 1997 was three years ago.
        • Every year of the 80s was 20 years ago.
        • 2010 was 10 years ago.
        • 2016 was two years ago.
        • 2018 was two years ago.
        • 2019 was one year ago.
        • 2020 lasted for six years, but ended three months into the year.
        • 2021-2022 didn’t happen.
        • 2023 ended just a few weeks ago.
        • 2024 still hasn’t ended. We also invented time travel. Consequently:
        • 2025 apparently started in the 1960s, and rapidly progressing towards the 1940s.
  • GluWu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Everything before 9/11 is fake news.

    Computers, never invented.

    AIDs and the cure for it, never happened.

    Bill Clinton, I mean cmon, doesn’t fucking exist.

    I’m old enough to remember when they were making all this stuff up. Like 2 whole world wars, yeah, right.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      9/11/2001 is the date the simulation was turned on. Everything prior to that is just programmed memories and fabricated history.

          • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            That’s the joke. And the proof.

            I personally remember it being spelt that way, but every book I’ve seen recently is spelt stain… something fucky happened with timelines.

            • D_C@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              I know, I was playing along.

              I’ve also seen pictures of it being spelt in both different ways, and they both looked genuine. No idea if they were or clever fakes though

  • FreeBeard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I always wondered what would happen if you cite an original source of something we consider common sense now. What would nature say if you use conservation of momentum and cite Isaac Newton and the Principia Mathematica.

    What if you quote something in latin. For most of science history this was completely normal.

  • BreadOven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Oof size: big.

    I had to translate German papers to English. Not necessarily because I’m that old, but they were the only ones that had the information I needed. Although most of my research was based on stuff in the 90’s…

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      “1900s” makes me think they’re referring to the decade of 1900-1909 😅

        • Carrot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          They aren’t? “Late 1900s” would be the latter 3rd of the century. 1994 would be in that latter third, so they are using it correctly.

            • Carrot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I get what you’re saying, but both work in this case, yours is just more precise. We’ve just lived in the late 1900s so it feels weird to lump the years we’ve experienced in with 900+ that we haven’t. But if someone says “late 1800s” for something like 1894, it wouldn’t feel weird at all.

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          That’s stings, but not quite as much as century as with that my brain now has to go through the process of determining which century when it never had to before.

          • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Century has that human element because “last century” is where old people are from. You wouldn’t meet people from the last millennium, but you know people from the last century. It’s 100 years, that’s a lifetime. Implying that you’re from the “last” one means you’re not from “this” one. Aka, ancient.

  • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Today in Warframe a new character dropped he is a rockstar. One guy from my clan asked me “Do you know who David Bowie is? He is kind of an old rock legend…” Bruh I’m 40 WTF?