Note that there still have been no studies on its efficacy. At worst, it is a great font to avoid ambiguity between characters.

  • ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is probably a stupid question. If it is free for personal and all commercial use… which case isn’t covered by that? Could just say it is free to use.

    • NONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      OP just tries to be as clear and transparent as possible, because there are times when someone says something is “free to use” but then in the “fine print” they hide limitations.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As someone that has pretty decent vision, I enjoyed reading this font very much. Imma have to download it just because it’s pleasant to read.

  • 667@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I just added this to my eReader. I’ve been reading g a lot lately and while I haven’t had any difficulty, I’m eager to see if it enhances comprehension.

    Good post OP.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m glad you found it useful.

      If you’re experimenting with fonts to see how they change comprehension, you could try Open Dyslexic too! It looks quite ugly, but it makes reading easier to me and another commenter on this thread. I suppose it’s a matter of testing what works best for you.

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think this actually has a negative effect for me. It’s like every character is now screaming for my attention, and my brain can’t read whole words and phrases. I have to process the letters first. Though it’s possible this could be more to do with the website’s rendering on mobile and default font size.

    • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It doesn’t work for me either. Just reading the text on the page linked here was uncomfortable. It’s not like you describe though - for me it’s like there’s too much white space and there’s this mass of words almost floating around the page and it’s hard to keep track of where I’m up to. I am a bad/slow reader and all reading is like that for me - that font just seems to make it worse.

      • CandleTiger@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think this font is meant for people with bad eyesight. The website doesn’t make any claims about trouble reading for other reasons.

        I’ve always read very fast with no problems but now I’m old and can’t see small print as easily. This font actually was much more comfortable for me to read without my glasses, which I guess is nice for me but no use at all for you.

        How do you feel about comic sans and the open dyslexia font some other comments on this page are talking about with positive and negative comments? Do those make any difference at all to you?

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          For me comic sands is 100% easy to read. Only has negative connotation from personal experience and the meme of it.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s interesting. I’d love to know if you have the same experience on a desktop and with different font sizes.

      • Flagstaff@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s fine for me on mobile, and I’m glad that the “I” has horizontal lines. So many scammers adopt fake usernames by using an “I” (capital “i”) instead of an “l” (lowercase “L”) and vice versa.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I actually changed my Anki to OpenDyslexic a couple of months ago! I changed it again when Atkinson Hyperlegible Next came out, but I agree that OpenDyslexic makes reading a breeze.

      My only grievance with OpenDyslexic is that I don’t think I could send reports with this font without pushback. On the other hand, I have sent multiple reports using Atkinson Hyperlegible and nobody has ever said a thing.

    • Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I wonder how it works. Maybe it has to do with the intentional varying of the sizes of holes in letters, and the lopsided lines so one can’t be confused as another.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        While dyslexia is actually a cluster of related issues, a common one seems to be with dimensionality. Basically, the reader’s brain assumes the objects are 3 dimensional. When the eyes make micro adjustments, the letters don’t rotate, since they are 2D. The brain misinterprets this as them rotating, or moving. This is perceived as them flickering or moving, in the corner of your eye.

        There are several ways to break this effect. I suspect the shape is intended to mess with and slightly overload the depth sense. Strong colours can also disrupt it. E.g. via a coloured filter or glasses.

    • lol_idk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I find this harder to read than almost any other “normal” font. I wonder if I have some other reading impairment I’ve never been aware of - having recently discovered I’m also not neurotypical

      • Master@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        As a dyslexic its very hard to read. But dyslexia isn’t one thing. Its a broad catch all category diagnosis. So im sure it does help some. But damn its also ugly…

      • Don Antonio Magino@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        To be honest, studies around whether this font is actually easier to read for people with dyslexia haven’t shown that to be the case. At least, that’s what I remember from reading about it in a Dutch skeptic magazine (Skepter) some time ago. So if you have dyslexia and find this font harder to read, that doesn’t have to say anything about you.

    • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I find it ironic that their website has extremely low contrasting colors making it very hard to read.

      (Look at the top left for the worst example)

    • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wish there was an open font that tries to do the same thing, but with an aesthetic that wasn’t reminiscent of comic sans.

        • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I like how that font disambiguates glyphs that often get confused, but I found it to be pretty hard to look at, honestly. I think the main issue might be that the line thickness appears to be uniform at all parts in all letters.

          • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well yes but beauty standards for typography run counter to accommodating for dyslexia, especially for sans serifs. Similarity in shapes, curves, weights, and stroke width are seen as beautiful, but they’re exactly what must be given up for more accessible typography.

            Someone else in the comments here did mention Bionic Reading though, and there’s a free alternative in Fast Font, which has a gradient of weights for each word from black for the first letter to thin for the last one. Might be something to consider

  • fievel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The original Atkinson Hyperlegible (without Next) is available by default on some Kobo e-readers. I use it for a few months now and I find that indeed it helps reading at night (or without my glasses because it’s nice to remove them from time to time).

  • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have good vision but I actually really like this font since i have a smaller phone screen! Anyone know how to install it on an Android phone?

    • Steven McTowelie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s been a long time since I tried, but I tried to install Atkinson Hyperlegible on my android and it wasn’t possible without rooting the phone. Your manufacturer may have a way to add fonts, but for Samsung I was limited to downloading them through their Galaxy store, which had no fonts I wanted

  • letraset@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I use this font for any document I type up, if it’s to be consumed by anyone else but myself.