It’s just one of 6,000 apps that New Zealand thinks might be best tamed with ERP

  • silverhand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Only those with no experience in corporate finance will find this surprising.

    Excel is a powerful tool. The only ones who ridicule it are idiots who don’t understand anything.

    • endofline@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s not… Try to write a formula range which covers only lower half of the column which is typical setup in summing numbers( avoiding headers ), limits in columns and records, ever changing formats across versions… You asking for a disaster to happen which happens very often

      • silverhand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Try to write a formula range which covers only lower half of the column which is typical setup in summing numbers( avoiding headers )

        You can literally label ranges to use them as variables in Excel formulae, not to mention Excel Tables has more operations and features than you’ll ever need.

        limits in columns and records

        Unless you are working with an unfiltered, un-aggregated ledger dump straight out of your database (in which case you shouldn’t be let anywhere near an office computer), it’s rather hard to cross 1M+ rows and 16.4k columns in corporate finance.

        ever changing formats across versions

        The .xlsx format was introduced in 2007 (18 years ago) and hasn’t changed since. Not to mention you can still use all kinds of plaintext formats whenever you want.

        • endofline@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Anybody who used ANY library to process xslx knows MS keeps changing it :-) About ranges… can you give me the range for whole columns minus 6 first records and 9 last records?

          • nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 minutes ago

            Would you like this in excel formula, VBA, or python?

            It can be done in all. You’re only proving the other poster’s point. Excel isn’t necessarily the best option for tech literate people but given the tech illiteracy of many offices, it isn’t surprising they use excel for stuff like this.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      In fairness to the register they also ridicule moving to a dedicatdd ERP in the same article.

      You’re r absolutely right there is nothing wrong with Excel. Its powerful software and ultimately it cones down to human and organisational processes about whether its being used to its best or not. You can also have the most expensive top end dedicated ERP in the world and still be a total mess. Similarly business used to run on pen and paper and could be highly efficient.

      Software is just a tool, and organisation go wrong when they think it alone is the solution to their problems.

      Also I doubt Health NZ overspend has anything whatsoever to do with excel. Instead it’ll be due to rising demand, and inflationary pressures on public finances. We have the exact problems here in the UK with the NHS just scaled up to a £182bn.

  • 0x01@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Honestly, that’s fine. This may be a wild take, but they grew and their usage of excel obviously didn’t hold them back, what’s the issue?

  • Amputret@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s just one of 6,000 apps that New Zealand thinks might be best tamed with ERP

    How does erotic role play help tame Excel?

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For a non-joke answer. ERP in this context means Enterprise Resource Planning. It basically allows you to do everything an enterprise requires with one software system instead of using several different ones.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s because you’re supposed to customize them, not use as-is. We’ve had a lot of happy customers. Some send us gifts! But for the first year or maybe even couple of years, you probably pay more to your partner for implementation, customizations and advice than to the ERP developer for licensing.

          ERPs aren’t for every company, different ERPs work best for different companies and different partners themselves have their own specializations. The one I work through (used to work for, but now I have my own company and just contract for them), does small to medium sized production companies. Think 5-200 employees usually. The ERP we work with is meant to cover every imaginable use case - which is why it doesn’t have enough depth. We add a bunch of stuff that isn’t there OOTB, sometimes remove things in default modules, etc.

          But first you NEED an ERP partner to make the most of it. At ours the CEO is also the biggest salesman. He’s not afraid to tell you if he doesn’t think it’s a good fit. A bad partner will still try to sell you and that’s going to end up in disappointment for everyone.

          • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Setting up an ERP can also be completely botched if the company’s representatives don’t fully grasp all the functions needed. What I’ve been going through as a customer of an ERP suite is that the “stars” of the software don’t actually understand the other 50% of functions outside their department. That remaining 50% is distributed among 4 other departments, so representation wasn’t exactly prioritized. Add in high turnover circa 2021 and the whole thing is logistical nightmare that finally at least has a goal in sight.

            The other underlying issue is the existing forms usually lack what we need and have too much fluff. Once our ERP partner modifies it, the ERP developer drops all support for that form. We get zero help when it gets mystery glitches.

            So yeah, I can get why some places say fuck it and stick with excel. Half the workforce knows excel well enough to write what they need. Take 10% of them to format and lock down spreadsheets so the other 50% of the workforce can just fill in boxes and pick drop downs. It just works.

            All that to say, I both expect more form a Healthcare company but also am not surprised.

    • NeatoBuilds@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It let’s your accounts blow off steam so they use excel better instead of filling the account ting sheets with dirty messages

  • Lemmist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That depends on spending articles, not on sum amount. Maybe their accounting is as simple as: 10bn income, 2bn to steal, 3 for salaries, 1 for medicaments and machinery, rest for advertisements.

    You don’t need super-pooper software for that.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Even if their spending is that simple in terms of categories, it’s almost certain their breakdown within each category is definitely quite a bit more complex. Hell, my wife runs her own therapy practice with just herself and she talks about how obnoxious dealing with insurance is for billing all the time.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, it depends entirely on how many things you’re tracking and how many people need to access it. It’s probably not the right tool here, but sometimes it just is.

    • LordPassionFruit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You could run empires on the back of a spreadsheet.

      You absolutely shouldn’t, it’s nearly the worst option you have available, but you could.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s not the worst option available, it might not be the cleanest solution, but it does offer a level of flexibility if you have an in-depth understanding of key operational (or financial) business processes.

        • LordPassionFruit@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 hours ago

          This is why I specified “nearly” the worst. It can absolutely get the job done and has basically every tool you’d need to do the job, but it’s pretty much the worst amongst the “this will do everything you need” options.

          My thought process was abacus < pen & paper < text file < spreadsheet < database solutions

          • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Not if there is a BACKUP folder with daily copies of all your spreadsheets.

            Sifting through the backups is so much fun when you’re trying to find when a particular issue started.

            • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Excel is indeed super powerful. I’ve seen firsthand what they power in multiple Fortune 500 companies, and usually for a lot of critical tasks. It doesn’t surprise me in the least that this company was using it for finances.