It is better than the conditions 50% of the planet’s populace live in, even if at least 10% of that was caused by the USA. If you have a collapse, you’ll get at least partially what’s shown in Civil War (2024).
Unless you propose that nearly every nation in the world collapse, the global south would be further exploited to fill the vacuum created by the hole in exports of electrical machinery, which all developing and above nations need.
It’d be nice if we didn’t kill the world when we do, but we will. And if the empires that are eager to snap up the corpse weren’t demonstrably worse.
So I suppose you oppose the United States of America then, since its very existence is destroying the world
So once again, my post
It is better than the conditions 50% of the planet’s populace live in, even if at least 10% of that was caused by the USA. If you have a collapse, you’ll get at least partially what’s shown in Civil War (2024).
Better because it relies on the suffering and exploitation of those in the global south, so again: See post
The world will be better off without the USA
Edit: That’s a bullshit movie BTW. It’s like a redditor’s ignorant idea of what would happen.
Unless you propose that nearly every nation in the world collapse, the global south would be further exploited to fill the vacuum created by the hole in exports of electrical machinery, which all developing and above nations need.
Why not collapse Russia first?