cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/30934764

The “privacy-first” company surprised its user base when CEO Andy Yen lauded Trump on social media.

  • vastard@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I’m in a pickle. Got proton and my own domain for email so I would be able to make an easy switch… but now I have masked emails for dozens if not hundreds of account logins.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    The fact that a privacy company based in a non five eyes country is even praising a government - especially one like the US - is a red flag.

    Nevermind the fact that they claim Republicans are anti big tech while being surrounded by tech CEOs…

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Cancelled my Proton subscription citing this as the reason. Hope others do the same. This administration is not normal and relations should never be normalized with them.

    • karpintero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yep, did the same. Started using Tuta for email, solid privacy and UI, app available on F-Droid, and the bonus for me was them being powered by renewables.

      The language in the tweet was telling, i.e party of the “little guys” and tagging the president for visibility. You can’t turn a blind eye to all the other destabilizing things this admin is doing just because they made 1 semi-competent cabinet pick (which should be the baseline expectation).

    • m105@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Planning to do the same, but first I have to find an alternative for my mail, probably I will try a self hosted mail server for a while

      • Quokka@mastodon.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        @m105 @Fizz there’s quite a few Swiss mail providers that may be of interest. Self-hosting mail can be a pain as those IPs tend to have a lower threshold for getting blocked/blacklisted. And make sure all your SPF, DKIM etc is fully configured.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Official company announcement, not only personal one.

      Proton has position itself as a service for those who want to avoid big tech spying on them and unfair government prosecution. It is then very charring that they officially support a party that is trying to go out of their way to reduce women/lgbtq rights and invited the whole cabal of big tech as guests of honor to the innaguration.

      If their mission and their messages do not align, it’s normal that customers are concerned.

      I would be concerned of they officially supported any other party, but this case is specially outrageous.

      Be a bit practical here people, Imagine the right-wingers saying “Oh no, he donated to left wingers, reeeeeeeee”

      This might be sarcasm right? They went full reeee with Nike, Gillette, Budweiser, Costco…

      • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        They did now, didn’t they, I’m simply gonna wait until Trump in his magnificent stupidity tries sanctioning Proton

        Let’s see Andy come out of that

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah… Much better to take the pitchforks out for every little shit one reads in the internet and pretend to be a good guy to accumulate fake internet points.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Really, the stupidity of some netizens on these daily “scandals” is astounding. It’s like they’re always looking for something/someone to be upset about. People, nobody cares which service/browser/whatever you use, so no need to announce everywhere that you’re leaving. Just leave.

          For instance: https://lemm.ee/post/53975606

          LOL, jusk ask for alternative, man. No need to put a story behind that.

  • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is what a kleptocratic oligarchy looks like folks. Suck up to the big man and he’ll let you fleece the joint.

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Until corporate Dems are thrown out, the reality is that Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses.”

    I don’t believe that they haven’t heard of Lina Khan.

    • sudneo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They did, they even worked together in the past.

      See https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1i2nz9v/on_politics_and_proton_a_message_from_andy/m7psmzx/

      Quote for those who don’t want to reddit.

      Yes, big fan of Lina Khan, I worked with her in 2020 on the House report on antitrust (the House was controlled by Democrats back then). I’ve discussed this elsewhere, but certain events in 2022 made it very clear that further progress on antitrust was unlikely under Democratic leadership. You can read more about the backstory here: https://time.com/6243256/schumer-kills-antitrust-big-tech-bills/

      Edit: I see someone else already posted it. I will leave it here even if it’s a duplicate for future self-shame.

    • lksaar@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, big fan of Lina Khan, I worked with her in 2020 on the House report on antitrust (the House was controlled by Democrats back then). I’ve discussed this elsewhere, but certain events in 2022 made it very clear that further progress on antitrust was unlikely under Democratic leadership. You can read more about the backstory here: https://time.com/6243256/schumer-kills-antitrust-big-tech-bills/

      his reddit account is pretry active if you want to read bad takes

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Problem is, she was lobbying Sony so hard that her corruption was clearly seen by everyone, she fought tooth and nail so Microsoft wouldn’t buy call of duty, and was saying that microsoft gaming department will become a monopoly, and… You see a monopoly out there? Microsoft gaming department is a giant flop even with call of duty, of what monopoly she was telling then?

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Microsoft gaming department is a giant flop even with call of duty, of what monopoly she was telling then?

        Cloud gaming? Duopoly and oligopoly (see healthcare) being also anticompetitive? Look, of course Sony also opposed to merger because it was a competitor. Every antitrust lawsuit is bound to attract some of them. I dunno what you’re going off on here.

        • bruhduh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Geforce now exist tho, and my point is, Microsoft is a huge slop, they were half dead even then, lisa khan and sony destroyed competition in name of antimonopoly when sony was already dominating even before that and now we have 800$ ps5 pro and everything, my beef is, if she was a antimonopoly representative, then she should prevent monopoly from happening, and sony IS a monopoly in AAA console space thanks to her, i mean, even duopoly is better than complete dominance of one of the players on market, look up amd nvidia duopoly and how it became when nvidia became monopoly, 5090 for 3000$ oh holy fuck, give us at least SOME competition, I don’t even dare to ask about PROPER competition because market came to monopolies already

          • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Sorry, I meant online services integrating with gaming in general.

            destroyed competition in name of antimonopoly when sony was already dominating even before that

            hell naw. look at xbox live. i think you have a very skewed view of MS’s market position. think about the logistics required to pull MS Flight Simulator (2020) off.

            800$ ps5

            it’s $700, and relatively nobody is buying that thing. plus how is buying activision blizzard gonna help console competition?

            sony IS a monopoly in AAA console space

            compare the sales or just ask the gaming sub

            give us at least SOME competition, I don’t even dare to ask about PROPER competition because market came to monopolies already

            does radeon not exist? you don’t happen to train AI models do you?

            • bruhduh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              I agree with most of your points except, i didn’t even heard of training ai without cuda, i know it’s possible, but it’s far from popular as i see, second, Microsoft is a dead horse and it’s understandable, but it could do some competition, not proper one but some, most of the community including ftc wished Microsoft gaming department too step down, and i would be all in if alternative in AAA gaming was opensource as Linux, but alternative is corporate monopoly, same with AMD GPUs this time, they flopped hard due to 5070, and my main point still stands, i don’t want a complete monopoly even if competition is on life support it should still exist

              • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                my point was you were making unsubstantiated assertions on markets that are just wrong. you addressed none of that

                Microsoft is a dead horse

                prove it

                same with AMD GPUs this time

                prove it

    • lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      MXroute doesn’t cater to users who require end-to-end encryption, advanced privacy features, or those who need built-in security measures beyond standard email protocols, as it’s primarily focused on reliable email delivery and hosting rather than security-first communication.

      Tuta would be a viable alternative to Proton.

      • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        security measures beyond standard email protocols

        Doesn’t exist. The only security you can have is if you use OpenPGP. Everything else is marketing and lies.

      • smitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        No they don’t, but I never switched to proton for that. I switched to proton to get away from iCloud. I also never loved the idea of them keeping my gpg key in the cloud, I can just as easily do e2e with mxroute in a more secure way

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    “We’re not liberal or conservative, we’re a secret third thing!(conservative)”

    • They’re swiss.

      We have more parties in our equivalent of the presidential office than you have parties in total.

      I have huge problems with this notion that you have to be either democrat or conservative. They don’t even cover 50% of the opinions I, a green-liberal (actual liberal, not US-definition), hold.

      You’re absolutely able and allowed to have your own opinion different from what any party official says.

      • __nobodynowhere@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        They were commenting on American politics though. Swiss parties are irrelevant. Supporting Trump is a crazy position no matter what your national is or what parties exist in that country.

      • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Saying someone is swiss isnt the defense you want it to be considering that the swiss helped harbor nazi wealth.

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        When commenting on US politics, they should be aware of US political realities though. When taking position relative to US politics, they should be aware of that. At the very least, they should comment that they’re progressive or something along the lines of “Our political orientation isn’t represented in US politics” to acknowledge that, like you did.

        But when your CEO endorses Republicans, pretending you’re neutral isn’t a good look.

        • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Don’t forget, Swiss Neutrality is the special kind of neutrality that lets them store gold bullion made from Jewish tooth fillings.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yes but swiss people can still be absolutely piece of shit human beings. They proved that in WWII by helping fund the Nazis directly. Swiss people also aren’t immune from rampant US party propaganda. You aren’t magical, psychologically different humans than the rest of the world.

        Publicly supporting an openly fascist dictator, whatever “political party” they are on, someone who directly opposes the stated mission and values of the company, means that they are piece of shit humans who cannot be trusted with our data because they will just lie with what they do with it just like how they lied to us about their company values.

      • TheCreamKnight@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have a huge problem with parties period. Parties inhibit critical thinking. And I’m an American. And I don’t want this. Eat the rich!

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Check my comment history…

    I said this before:

    fucking stop putting all your eggs in one basket, folks

    Mix and match ftw…

    This is not a deal breaker for me but if they keep this up, I will stop using them. And it just one service, so I can easily do it, assholes.

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        the CEO of a company I use for emails expressed a questionable opinion on antitrust issue

        it’s not deal breaker for me

        absolutely disgusting

        If this is absolutely disgusting for you, I guess you have really, really, really high standards, that probably nobody can meet.

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not being ok with a rapist insurrectionist grifter felon being in charge of the country is too high a standard?

          🖕

          • sudneo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Expressing support for a specific person picked, in a specific and narrow context = being OK with etc…? Also, it’s not his country either (like is not mine). As an external observer does it mean that if Trump will do anything (anything at all) that I agree with, even for the broken clock theory, I need to lobotomize myself and not say it, otherwise I am OK with a rapist insurrectionist grifter felon etc. etc.?

              • sudneo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                No, I can read sentences in context, and I learned that the world has 3 dismensions quite early. Maybe it was because I lived in a country with a public school system that works (more or less).

                Anyway, a cult is a cult, and I feel I have nothing to gain from this interaction. Cya.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean company backs pro-company party isn’t exactly surprising. You want to not shop at every company that supports Republicans? You’re going to have a hard time finding anywhere to shop in most of the US. Gotta stick to smaller companies, and if you get small enough you’ll get to mom and pop locations where personal votes are the comparison and they’ve voted Republican their entire lives.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          there’s an entire continuum of political support, and you can choose to draw a line anywhere on it. I think it’s perfectly reasonable to draw that line at outright public endorsement, particularly now with Trump in office.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          People are reactionaries by nature, they don’t think shit through until they get fucked enough to learn or they die, which ever comes first.