• Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yes you should say that person you hired sucked or did not meet your expectations for the job.

    Not all information is cleared away, the information pertinent to the performance of the job remains, which should be the only information that matters when the topic of discussion is someone’s job performance.

    Unless, that is, you’ve met and tested the performance of every white guy available to you. Otherwise you’re painting people with the same brush. X type of people are Y is racist thinking.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      This is where you are making a logical error in your thinking. You are saying “unless he tested the performance or every white guy available to me”. But he was not talking about all indian people. He doesn’t have to go out and do research to talk about his experience of an indian guy he hired, that is a bit silly, no?

      We are allowed to talk about our personal experiences in life. Thats my take on it anyway.

      In fact you can’t talk about anything otherwise. Because your opinion is not a scientific research paper and it was never supposed to be.

      • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        “Gross Incompetence of specifically Indian Immigrants

        He says:

        No offence… but they are just so stupid

        Also

        I also lead a team offshore in India and work with many of them

        It’s not “just this one guy” - he’s painting ALL Indian immigrants (plural) based on his experience with this ONE guy, and the offshore team he has worked with.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          He is talked about his team and his experiences, not all 1 billion Indians on the planet :)

          • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yes, in order to justify the point of view that ALL Indian immigrants are stupid.

            It’s in the title my guy.

            If I were to say I refuse to hire people who like Matt Walsh, because in my point of view they’re all dumbfucks, that’s discrimination. It’s why we have laws in the West against that sort of thing. It works both ways for identities and points of view you subscribe to.

            It’s just a more complex answer than “it’s just an opinion man.” That’s 1950s thinking - and yeah it was a simpler time because white men owned almost everything in the West and everyone else could go fuck themselves.

            • 1984@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              The title obviously applies to the Indians he worked with. You seriously think the man talks about every Indian on the planet?

              Let me ask you a question. If a girl makes a video about how men suck because she is disappointed, do you think she dated every man on the planet?