And what would happen if we did?

  • squid_slime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    No. If someone’s rich they can lobby if they can lobby they will act within theyre best interest.

  • elephantium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I doubt it, at least in the US. The rich have a lot of influence over how laws are made, and I don’t really see any appetite to pay a greater share.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    they would threaten to move all operations to somewhere like the Cayman Islands which makes no fucking sense

    • meowgenau@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      They can threaten all they want, it’s simply not possible. If it actually was possible, they’d have done that a long time ago.

      • gerbler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Like it or not they have assets here. If they move their operations overseas and evade taxes they can enjoy having their assets seized and their IP confiscated.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    1. Yes.

    2. They would fight back, buy all our media sources, and buy our governments to make sure 1 didn’t happen.

  • JohnyRocket@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Every country would have to do it. A party here in Switzerland wanted to drastically increase inheritance tax for certain large inheritances, and the rich people threatened so hard to leave the country that everyone believed them and now nobody supports it anymore. (They said their children would not be able to pay the tax because most of their wealth is supposedly in company shares, so if they died their children would have to sell off the companies to Cineese companies which nobody in Switzerland liked to hear)

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Of course that’s not true. We have data from around the world showing it’s not true. It’s not even true within the United States if you look at state taxes.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Certainly. Most of the 20th century, the top tier tax rate was set at a level that can only be described as “punitive”. It was higher than 90% to kill off the robber barons.

      While I am not morally opposed to beheading rich people, we really need to go back to the tax rates we had in the 50’s. And add a securities tax, payable in shares of that security, that the IRS can liquidate slowly over time.

  • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    In Finland fines are based on percentage of yearly income.

    We’re still waiting for Bezos to come here and get a massive speeding ticket to fix our budget for the next decade

    • petersr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The newly elected government is actually quite cost efficient in this regard. Since they already are all crooked business men, they don’t need to pay anyone to get those tax laws passed.

  • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s probably not possible at this point. If there was some kind of revolution, poor people could have access to healthcare, education, shelter, and food. You know, basic dignity and hope for a better future. But the problem is that hopeless wage slaves are better for capitalism.