• Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I understand your perspective but I want to ask a question, not to you, but for you to think about it. What motivation causes the imports?

    If corn syrup is a replacement for whatever they are doing, why are they importing raw sugar? If raw sugar is cheaper than you would expect them to already use sugar for everything and not corn syrup, and switching to corn syrup would be an increase in cost . If raw sugar costs the same, import is additional paperwork, why import? Raw sugar is more expensive, why would they pay more?

    Raw sugar can’t be replaced easily in their use case? Now that makes sense.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Fact is, HFCS is cheaper. I haven’t checked the entirety of it’s supply chain to figure out why, but it is cheaper.

      If sugar was the same cost, they wouldn’t have switched to HFCS in the first place (why mess with your successful product for no gain?). Fact of the matter is that HFCS is saving them money. It might be pennies per bottle, but when you’re moving 10M bottles of soda, those pennies turn into dividends, literally.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Sugar tastes better than HFCS. Ask anyone who drinks Mexican Coke. “Tastes better” doesn’t matter when there’s no other option.