IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 12 days agoDer krieg ist verlorenlemmy.worldimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageDer krieg ist verlorenlemmy.worldIndustryStandard@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 12 days agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareIndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·12 days agoDoing a little less genocide is bad Not doing genocide is good. How is this so difficult to understand?
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·12 days agoBecause not doing genocide is not on the menu. You have a little less genocide or a lot more genocide. That’s your lot If you refuse to choose because you don’t like either, you end up with the one you like the least.
minus-squareIndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·12 days ago Because not doing genocide is not on the menu. Indeed. My argument is Chef Harris should have put that on the menu. Imagine the stakes. Not genocide vs genocide! The moral imperative on the ballot!
Doing a little less genocide is bad
Not doing genocide is good.
How is this so difficult to understand?
Because not doing genocide is not on the menu. You have a little less genocide or a lot more genocide. That’s your lot
If you refuse to choose because you don’t like either, you end up with the one you like the least.
Indeed. My argument is Chef Harris should have put that on the menu.
Imagine the stakes. Not genocide vs genocide! The moral imperative on the ballot!