At least half of men don’t wash their hands before leaving a public restroom. Literally everything is covered in dick stuff. Source: 30+ years of using public restrooms as a male.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    The article below this is

    Donald Trump says that if wins the White House, he’ll fire special counsel Jack Smith “within two seconds” of taking office.

    Imagine a criminal openly admitting he’ll use his power to evade justice, and somehow half the country is still voting for him

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s the “people are still voting for him” part that terrifies me. Because we can defeat Trump, but you can’t do a whole lot with a rotten electorate.

  • eightpix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Heres two:

    The ratio between cells of your body that belong to you vs. cells on or in your body that are microorganisms is about 1:1 — slightly favouring the bacteria.

    If the Sun were destroyed, we would not know about it until more than 8 minutes after it happened.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    The McKelvey–Schofield chaos theorem proves that, if an electorate is presented with a series of proposed policy changes and everyone votes according to their honest preference, the proposals can be fashioned and ordered in such a way that any policy can be made to win—even one that no voter prefers to the starting point.

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McKelvey–Schofield_chaos_theorem

        There will in most cases be no Condorcet winner and any policy can be enacted through a sequence of votes, regardless of the original policy. This means that adding more policies and changing the order of votes (“agenda manipulation”) can be used to arbitrarily pick the winner.

        The article doesn’t explicitly say that this includes policies not preferred by any single voter, but it’s implied by “any” and “arbitrary” (and can be verified by the original theorems).

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          I’m not too familiar in the field, but doesn’t a policy have to appeal more to a specific base than its appeal to another base to cause a Cordocet tie?

          • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            Yeah, the Condorcet criterion is a lot more restrictive in the space of policies (where you can make incremental changes in any direction) than in elections for a discrete set of candidates. (Which is why they say that in most cases there won’t be one.)

            • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              Yeah, so in my understanding of that, doesn’t that mean the winning policy has to appeal more to a voter base than one that appeals to another voter base?

              • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                That’s true for any pairwise vote, but not for the entire sequence.

                As in the Condorcet paradox, voter preferences are intransitive: voters preferring A to B and B to C doesn’t imply that voters will prefer A to C. But where the Condorcet paradox shows how this can lead to a cyclical subset of candidates where no candidate can beat all other members of the subset, the chaos theorem shows how this can lead to a series of votes that ends absolutely anywhere.

                • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  But if it is a paradox, then every proposal that still stands has to have beaten another proposal at least once. Thus I don’t see how it could be one nobody has preferred at the start.

  • bizarroland@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I don’t think I’m ever going to forget, I went on a road trip and when I was in Arizona stopped at a rest stop and took a leak and washed my hands afterwards.

    This native guy walked in, and I only call him out for being native because I’m native also so it’s kind of cool to see another one in the wild, and he immediately said, “Get some poop on your hands? I only wash my hands when I get poop on them.”

    So yeah, I never touch anything in a bathroom without like at least a paper towel between me if I can avoid it

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Hi Aaron, how quickly did you get sick of people deliberately mispronouncing your name?

      Also, I think your name is very fun to write in cursive.

  • Tyoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Meanwhile here I am washing before and after, just because I saw it on House.

    (Despite the fact that he makes a big deal about it in the first episode and in the numerous times we see him go to the bathroom following that he never once does it again. (Yes. I checked.))

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      First episodes almost always don’t count as far as lore goes, even if some things do carry over.

      Uh-oh Spagetti-O’s

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    There are about 20 supervolcanoes on earth which each have the capacity to kill billions should they erupt.

  • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    If a nuclear missile is launched at the United States the President has just 6 minutes to come to terms with that and decide to launch a counter attack.

    If that counter attack is headed to North Korea, any land based missiles will head over the arctic circle, over Russian airspace where similar shoot/no shoot decisions will have to be made in the same amount of time.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      That is why subs with nukes are hidding someplace. If the president is wrong and now the us doesn’t exist the captan will finish ending the world

      russia has the same

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Most nuclear enabled countries have nuclear subs. I believe here in the UK our entire nuclear deterrent is based on trident missiles fired from submarines.

    • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      There’s an anecdote about a U2 naming a song “One Minute Warning” if I recall correctly: many years ago, when a UK prime minister learned the US got 6 minutes, they asked how long the UK would have. The response: “I suppose we’d have about a minute.”

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Basically why it’s called MAD (mutually assured destruction). You’ll either get the first shot for free, or everyone kills everyone.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      If a nuclear missile is launched at the United States the President has just 6 minutes to come to terms with that and decide to launch a counter attack or not.

      US nuclear deterrence in 2024 doesn’t rely on launch-on-warning, but on the expectation that no hostile power has the ability to locate and destroy the US ballistic missile fleet prior to them performing their counterlaunches.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_strike

      In nuclear strategy, a retaliatory strike or second-strike capability is a country’s assured ability to respond to a nuclear attack with powerful nuclear retaliation against the attacker. To have such an ability (and to convince an opponent of its viability) is considered vital in nuclear deterrence, as otherwise the other side might attempt to try to win a nuclear war in one massive first strike against its opponent’s own nuclear forces.

      Submarine-launched ballistic missiles are the traditional, but very expensive, method of providing a second strike capability, though they need to be supported by a reliable method of identifying who the attacker is.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Launch_on_warning

      Launch on warning (LOW), or fire on warning, is a strategy of nuclear weapon retaliation where a retaliatory strike is launched upon warning of enemy nuclear attack and while its missiles are still in the air, before detonation occurs.

      In 1997, a US official stated that the US had the technical capability for launch on warning but did not intend to use a launch on warning posture and that the position had not changed in the 1997 presidential decision directive on nuclear weapon doctrine.

      This is also true of the French and British nuclear deterrents, FWIW – the British don’t even maintain a nuclear arsenal other than on subs, so they haven’t even bothered with maintaining the option to do so, and the French only use tactical ALCMs in addition to the strategic sub-launched weapons.

      • poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        "Put yourself under the command of the United States, if it is still there"

        JFC nuclear weapons are horrifying

        • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Here’s a tad bit of reassurance: We don’t have enough nukes to kill every human. Just most of them. We can’t eliminate all of us even if we wanted to :)

          • spookex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Also, I’d say that odds also favour places that nobody really gives a shit about, like sure, US, UK, China, Russia, large parts of Europe, and North Korea are probably guaranteed to be nuclear craters, but I doubt that any of the missiles are pointed at Africa or most of South America

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Here’s a fun one

    You know how you go to the public pool and you smell the chlorine keeping the water clean? That’s not chlorine you’re smelling.

    Chlorine is a great sanitizer but when dissolved in water it has almost no smell. However, chlorine binds to organic substances like dead skin cells and especially strongly to urea (aka pee), forming chloramine. Chloramine has significantly less sanitizing capability than chlorine, but it has a very strong chloriney smell.

    You can get rid of chloramine by ‘shocking’ the pool- adding an oxidizer or increasing the chlorine level very high to what’s called breakpoint chlorination. Shock powder is expensive though so it’s not always used as often as it should be.

    So when you go to the public pool and you get that strong chlorine smell, all that means is either the pool water is dirty and hasn’t been shocked in a while, or someone peed in the pool recently.

    Enjoy your swim!

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      You didn’t mention the important part - sweat does that too. So it might not be pee, just sweaty people getting washed off. Which is better, to be fair.

      • Zahtu@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Your Tap water being dirty is Not an Option? When they chlorine it, there’s certainly a need to get it Clean from e.g. the Pipes or other contaminants

      • BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Chloramines are disinfectants used to treat drinking water. Chloramines are most commonly formed when ammonia is added to chlorine to treat drinking water.

        source

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        The chlorine does its job, and whatever shit it kills becomes chloramine. Chlorine does have a smaller smell of its own so maybe they just put a shit ton of it in also.

    • FeeshyFish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      My wife was so mad at me when I explained this to her. She said the chlorine smell would give her nostalgia and I ruined it.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      If you pay attention at the beach you will totally notice people wading in to take a piss and then wading back out of the water. I know the ocean is big and all but there’s something… uncivilized about it.

  • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    At least half of men don’t wash their hands before leaving a public restroom.

    How does this work in the US? I’m assuming with the amount of gigantic pickup trucks and guns, a lot of guys require tweezers and magnifying glasses to find their dicks

    Do they wash the tweezers?

    • aaron@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Really well done. Creative and informed. Yes, we have tweezer-washing stations and very few men use them. Good question.

      • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        and very few men use them.

        Brave of them to behave like they have modern healthcare rights lol

    • just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      So you know how you have dna? Well dna converts into amino acids and long chains of amino acids are called proteins. Proteins are the real workers in our body.

      But you might think, if you knew the dna sequence, you know it all, correct? Not really. You see, dna is only 1 dimensional data. A lot of the information about the functions of a protein comes from its structure.

      So really, if you have a correct dna converted into amino acid chain (a protein), it still needs to be in the correct shape or folding in order for it to function.

      Prions are incorrect foldings of amino acid which obviously do not work. But whats more is that, when these folded structures come in contact with other functioning proteins, they can turn them into incorrect folding as well.

      Since these proteins are still your own (ie they still came from your dna) the immune system doesn’t quite work on them like it would on a foreign substance like bacteria or virus.

      • Krusty@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I actually read it as “priSons” and I read all the answer wondering how it would get to prisons lol

      • eightpix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’m glad someone put the prions in here. As a biology student, there was only one thing more terrifying than retroviruses — prions.

      • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        To add to how scary prions are, you can’t really cure them, and when the prions get on a surface, it’s extremely difficult to sanitize that surface in a way that will destroy the prions. A lot of techniques that kill bacteria or even viruses like alcohol won’t work on them. Heat works but you have to make it extremely hot, much hotter than what’s needed to kill something like a bacteria.

        • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          Alternatively, UV light and a some heat should do it pretty quick!! Radical reactions are dope like that

  • Bruhh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Your tongue knows how something feels even if you’ve never licked it. Most people have never licked a tire but you know exactly how it’d feel if you did.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    I wash my hands before I piss because my dick is the cleanest surface in that bathroom. Touch nothing afterward without a paper towel barrier

    • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      ‘Was there anything else on the dinner menu?’

      ‘Vole-au-vents and Cream of Rat,’ said Gimlet. ‘All hygienically prepared.’

      ‘How do you mean, “hygienically prepared”?’ said Carrot.

      ‘The chef is under strict orders to wash his hands afterwards.’

      The assembled dwarfs nodded. This was certainly pretty hygienic. You didn’t want people going around with ratty hands.

      • Feet of Clay by Terry Pratchett
    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I have bad news, most (?) paper towels, toilet paper, and even the toilet seat covers are microscopically transparent, meaning there are plenty of gaps for microbes to get through.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Paper towels folded over on themselves absolutely create a barrier between my hand and the door handle. I’m not talking about flushable paper or toilet seat covers

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Paper towels are able to absorb water because of cellulose’s natural gaps and spaces:

          Most bacteria are about 1 micron, and these gaps range from around 1-10 microns.

          Especially if damp, it can be argued that they don’t stop the transfer of bacteria. It’s possible that your bacteria transfers through it and vice versa. This is all before the fact that paper towels can already harbor bacteria on their own.

          That being said, paper towels do block some. You just shouldn’t think of them as sterile or a magic blocker for bacteria.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            I’d be interested to culture petri dishes off my hand after I use a new paper towel to turn off the faucet vs grabbing the wet handle with my entire hand and shutting it off and then drying off my hand…